View Full Version : So Vick can't run the West Coast?
Dublin Mike
09-19-2004, 06:20 PM
He looked pretty impressive today. The Foulcons dominated the Rams in every aspect of the game. the 'cons dropped over 400 total yards on em, and the "horrible" D kicked their teeth in, holding the Ram O to 31 yards rushing.
On a side note, the last time the Foul cons went 2-0 was 1996, the year they won the NFC.
Faulk: 12 carries, 20 yards. Ouch. You don't win with a line like that. Fact is, the Rams aren't very good, and the Falcons are better than many thought.
MountaineerDave
09-19-2004, 11:47 PM
Well, let's just go with your first presumption, Marc.
I would like to see Atlanta play like that against a good team. San Fran might be better than anyone expected; they played NO to the final whistle, too.
The Rams, as you note, are NOT VERY GOOD. I feel badly for Marc Bulger, but he would never start for my football team.
Dave
buckeyefan78
09-20-2004, 01:05 AM
No love for the Central Catholic boy huh Dave?
I'd put more blame on Martz than anyone else. Can we dismiss this idiot already, or are people still actually high on him? Offensive guru my ass.
On Vick...let's wait and see everyone. I'm never sold on the running quarterback til he wins the Super Bowl, or plays more than 8 quarters in a season.
MountaineerDave
09-20-2004, 01:09 AM
Oh, I don't care about Bulger's Central Catholic heritage, 78. Matriculated at Morgantown. I root for him, but I think he's a bad excuse for a starting QB, honestly. In much the same way I view AJ Feeley or Tim Rattay.
Dave
buckeyefan78
09-20-2004, 01:37 AM
Oh man Dave, come on. Hey, Bulger ain't Marino, but lumping him in with Feeley or Rattay? Yikes !
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.