Go Back   Sports Central Message Boards > Community Discussion > The Lounge > Politics & Religion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-03-2008, 05:25 PM   #1
philabramoff
Exiled Packerfan in SoCal
 
philabramoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 537
philabramoff is on a distinguished road
Default A definition of "insanity"

I'm not sure which thread I saw it on...but I did see CK comment
to Buck something like "you're the only other 'sane' one on this site."

CK, I assume you were using hyperbole, or making a point, or something
like that, so no direct criticism. After all, I'm pretty sane (or at least
I like to think so).

But consider this...

Most of you have undoubtedly heard the saying that "Insanity is
doing the same thing over and over, but expecting different results."

That said...for those of you who promote the virtues of socialism:
Socialism has been a disaster everywhere it has been tried at a
national level. It basically served to produce widespread poverty,
blight, suffering, and massive loss of personal rights and freedoms
for its citizens. Moreover, most socialist countries have seen attempted
mass exoduses of their citizens trying to escape it, many of whom have
come to the United States. These countries have seen despotism, and
in some cases, mass slaughters of their citizens. Blatant examples of
my point are the Soviet Union, China, Cuba, Poland, Romania, Mongolia,
North Korea, North and South Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Bulgaria, Slovakia,
the Czech Republic, East Germany, many countless nations of Africa, and
now even Canada to a degree.

So...why do you think we ought to try that here?
Wouldn't that be insanity?
philabramoff is offline  
Old 07-03-2008, 10:25 PM   #2
CKFresh
Most Hated Member
 
CKFresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 7,377
CKFresh will become famous soon enough
Default

Actually Phil, socialism works quite well. Take a trip to Sweden. Better yet, take a look at Great Britain.

Furthermore, the examples you site are not examples of socialism. I'm sure you are aware that socialism is an economic system that comes AFTER capitalism. The Soviet Union and China skipped the necessary step of capitalism, and went directly from feudalism to socialism. This obviously can not and will not work.

In addition, socialism is designed to work with a democratic government, not totalitarian like the governments of China and the USSR.

The failed "socialism" experiments of the past were, in actuality, not examples socialism. They failed due to oppressive governments, corruption, and a rushed approach to a more advanced economic structure.

The mass slaughters that you mention have nothing to do with the economic system.

An infant isn't prepared to raise a family. A child (feudalism) must go through adolescence (capitalism) before he is prepared to be a parent raise a family (socialism). The failed attempts of the past were examples of young children (feudalism) trying to rush into parenthood (socialism), while completely skipping the maturation process of adolescence (capitalism).
__________________
Do yourself a favor, become your own savior.

Think Fresh.
CKFresh is offline  
Old 07-06-2008, 05:30 PM   #3
DETMURDS
Detroit Native!
 
DETMURDS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: God's Green Earth
Posts: 1,703
DETMURDS has a little shameless behavior in the past
Default

Again,...avoiding the question.
DETMURDS is offline  
Old 07-07-2008, 07:54 AM   #4
CKFresh
Most Hated Member
 
CKFresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 7,377
CKFresh will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DETMURDS View Post
Again,...avoiding the question.
I answered the question directly. :lol:
__________________
Do yourself a favor, become your own savior.

Think Fresh.
CKFresh is offline  
Old 07-08-2008, 09:19 PM   #5
DETMURDS
Detroit Native!
 
DETMURDS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: God's Green Earth
Posts: 1,703
DETMURDS has a little shameless behavior in the past
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CKFresh View Post
I answered the question directly. :lol:
I was making reference to this:

"I'm not sure which thread I saw it on...but I did see CK comment
to Buck something like "you're the only other 'sane' one on this site."


I know it wasn't a question really, but it was a comment he did make and I thought you would surely have a reply?
DETMURDS is offline  
Old 07-07-2008, 05:48 PM   #6
philabramoff
Exiled Packerfan in SoCal
 
philabramoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 537
philabramoff is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CKFresh View Post
Actually Phil, socialism works quite well. Take a trip to Sweden. Better yet, take a look at Great Britain.
Not sure I'd call Sweden a haven of human life. Their highest tax
bracket is 108%, and they have a 1/6 unemployment rate. Their
cripplingly high taxes are necessary for their nationalized healthcare
system (with its long wait-times, as usual). Also, they do have the
highest suicide rate in the world.

By the way, when I first heard that they had a 108% tax rate bracket,
I didn't believe it either. How was that possible, I thought? Well,
their reasoning is that if you are so wealthy to reach that high of
an income...you must have a lot of other wealth besides that.

As for Great Britain, not sure they're such a great place right now, either.
From my understanding, their economy is quite strained. They've had
to import large numbers of foreign workers to keep their economy going
to compensate for their large numbers of their citizens on the dole.
I wouldn't be surprised to see them go through a collapse.

Fortunately for France, Italy, and China, they've decided to dump
socialism, and pursue free-market capitalism again...much to their
benefit and that of their citizens. Ireland has never adopted
socialism, and currently has one of the most dynamic economies of
any country in the world of its size.

Moreover, and this is really a fundamental difference between the
two of us, CK (although, to be fair, I'd offer you the chance to clarify
your point if you wish)...I'm a real defender of personal property, and
really regard one of the most fundamental freedoms of all is the freedom
to the fruits of one's own labor. IE, high taxes are truly a pernicious
violation of that basic human right...meaning that your labor does not
belong to you, but to the state. To me, that is a horrible violation of
the dignity of the human person.

If there is one main reason that I detest socialism, it's that.
philabramoff is offline  
Old 07-07-2008, 07:07 PM   #7
buckeyefan78
Happy Land
 
buckeyefan78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,861
buckeyefan78 is a jewel in the roughbuckeyefan78 is a jewel in the roughbuckeyefan78 is a jewel in the rough
Default

Soviet Union, China, Cuba, Poland, Romania, Mongolia,
North Korea, North and South Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Bulgaria, Slovakia,
the Czech Republic, East Germany


You managed to rail against socialism using 15 nations that never adopted it.

The problem Phil (as CK already did a great job of explaining) is that socialism is a Marxist tenet in nature and none of those nations actually followed the procedures laid out by Marx to get to socialism/communism.

I remember debating this before Phil...and no offense...but if you aren't willing to read Marx or even read about him...it's impossible for anyone to understand that those examples weren't communism/socialism in nationalist states.

I understand that's what they told us in school but it simply isn't true. Hell, I'm forced to teach it so imagine how much I like doing so.





Sweden is more of a welfare state of corporation based on Marxist/Socialist beliefs. The private sector makes 90% of goods/services and redistributes 50% of the wealth. Exporting is the only thing that is under free market capitalism so it can compete with the rest of the world. Unfortunately, that globalization and forced competition with economic nations that oppress their poor (such as the U.S.) has given rise to some complaints by Swedes when it comes to extra income.
buckeyefan78 is offline  
Old 07-07-2008, 07:47 PM   #8
CKFresh
Most Hated Member
 
CKFresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 7,377
CKFresh will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Not sure I'd call Sweden a haven of human life. Their highest tax
bracket is 108%, and they have a 1/6 unemployment rate. Their
cripplingly high taxes are necessary for their nationalized healthcare
system (with its long wait-times, as usual). Also, they do have the
highest suicide rate in the world.

By the way, when I first heard that they had a 108% tax rate bracket,
I didn't believe it either. How was that possible, I thought? Well,
their reasoning is that if you are so wealthy to reach that high of
an income...you must have a lot of other wealth besides that.
Hmmm, even with those suicide rates they still live long than Americans... Maybe that health care is doing something for them...

As for their "crippling tax rates," I wonder why a higher percentage of Swedes are satisfied with their economy than Americans?

Quote:
As for Great Britain, not sure they're such a great place right now, either.
From my understanding, their economy is quite strained. They've had
to import large numbers of foreign workers to keep their economy going
to compensate for their large numbers of their citizens on the dole.

I wouldn't be surprised to see them go through a collapse.
Import foreign labor? Kind of like thos "illegals" who come into America and keep our economy going?

So Great Britain is having some economic trouble... Does that mean the idea of socialism is a failure? Of course not. Just because the US went through the Great Depression, does that mean capitalism is a failure?

Quote:
Moreover, and this is really a fundamental difference between the
two of us, CK (although, to be fair, I'd offer you the chance to clarify
your point if you wish)...I'm a real defender of personal property, and
really regard one of the most fundamental freedoms of all is the freedom
to the fruits of one's own labor. IE, high taxes are truly a pernicious
violation of that basic human right...meaning that your labor does not
belong to you, but to the state. To me, that is a horrible violation of
the dignity of the human person.
In REAL socialism, the state is the individual. The power, wealth, and means of production belong to the people.

As we stand now in America, we are owned by corporations and government. The "average joe" doesn't own jack **** in this country.

Quote:
(as CK already did a great job of explaining)
Sorry, I just wanted to read that again

-------------

Phil, I think the one key point you (and many others) are missing, is what socialism really is. China and the USSR really are not examples of socialism. Just because they called it socialism doesn't make it so.

Often times "followers" can pervert the message, and use it for their own political advantage.

As Marx once said, "I am not a Marxist."
__________________
Do yourself a favor, become your own savior.

Think Fresh.
CKFresh is offline  
Old 07-07-2008, 07:50 PM   #9
buckeyefan78
Happy Land
 
buckeyefan78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,861
buckeyefan78 is a jewel in the roughbuckeyefan78 is a jewel in the roughbuckeyefan78 is a jewel in the rough
Default

In REAL socialism, the state is the individual

I sometimes wonder why people don't get this point.

It isn't like you can get confused and think that in capitalist democracy like ours the state represents the individual/the people.

I mean...who in the hell would think that?

buckeyefan78 is offline  
Old 07-07-2008, 07:52 PM   #10
CKFresh
Most Hated Member
 
CKFresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 7,377
CKFresh will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by buckeyefan78 View Post

I mean...who in the hell would think that?

Just about every person in this country
__________________
Do yourself a favor, become your own savior.

Think Fresh.
CKFresh is offline  
Old 07-08-2008, 09:55 AM   #11
philabramoff
Exiled Packerfan in SoCal
 
philabramoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 537
philabramoff is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by buckeyefan78 View Post
In REAL socialism, the state is the individual.

I sometimes wonder why people don't get this point.
Okay, CK and Buck...

Excuse me for being a total dumb tird about this, but I really would
like you guys to explain this idea to me. I mean it, I'll listen (meaning
to YOU guys...don't just say "read Marx".)

The way I'm reading this, the assertion that the "state is the individual"
just sounds like playing with words, an attempt to put a rosy face on
huge, far-reaching, overcontrolling government, that says it is
acting on behalf of its citizens.

The way I understand socialism, is that you work...the government basically
confiscates most or all you earn, then redistributes it the way it wants to,
saying that it is doing it "equally", and then saying "see...we do this 'for
the people'."

My suggestion...just let people work, keep what they earn, allow the
gov't to tax in order to provide basic necessary community services, and
then otherwise, stay the hell out of people's lives.

Please tell me where I'm wrong.
philabramoff is offline  
Old 07-08-2008, 10:11 AM   #12
CKFresh
Most Hated Member
 
CKFresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 7,377
CKFresh will become famous soon enough
Default

Phil, I definitely wasn't implying that you are a "dumb tird," and apologize if I made it seem that way.

You know I respect your views and find you to be an intelligent person.

I'll wait to see if buck replies on your questions about socialism. He is definitely more informed on the subject than I am, and probably better at explaining it.

If he doesn't reply here, I will try my best to explain my view of socialism.
__________________
Do yourself a favor, become your own savior.

Think Fresh.
CKFresh is offline  
Old 07-08-2008, 04:58 PM   #13
philabramoff
Exiled Packerfan in SoCal
 
philabramoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 537
philabramoff is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CKFresh View Post
Phil, I definitely wasn't implying that you are a "dumb tird,"
Not intended. I was using hyperbole on my own. I didn't suggest you
were calling me an idiot. I kind of was, you know, kind of when a person
feels like they are asking a "dumb question" and they say "Maybe I'm being
stupid, but....."

Waiting for your replies....

But, in the meantime, I've been thinking about all this. In short, I just
can't buy it. The idea that "the state is the individual", honestly, sounds
like a fundamental contradiction. Either that, or that it means that the
state is the collective, and the individual lives for the collective....ultimately
that nobody lives for themselves, they live for the community only, and in
turn the state breastfeeds us like a baby in a cradle.

As nice as it all may sound, I just don't trust it. I don't trust the state
to take away most or all my personal wealth, perform some magical voodoo
on it, and then return it to me. I prefer to work for myself, take responsibility
for my own needs, pay a moderate tax for necessary government services
and to help those truly in need, and otherwise have the government
stay out of my life. I can do just fine....and don't really want to be forced
to pay for other people who can also "do just fine" if they really want
to.

As for disparity in wealth, that doesn't bother me. Just as long as we
do help those truly in need. In fact, I think disparity in wealth is
a good thing. It means that there are people out there taking
financial risks, creating jobs, and producing many things that people
need.

For example, I want drug companies like Amgen, Glaxo, Merck, and
others to be filthy stinking rich. It means that they have created lots of
life-saving medications that diabetics like me need, and have lots of
resources to create more.
philabramoff is offline  
Old 07-08-2008, 05:01 PM   #14
CKFresh
Most Hated Member
 
CKFresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 7,377
CKFresh will become famous soon enough
Default

Phil, I'm off work, I'll get back to you later tonight.

Later mate.
__________________
Do yourself a favor, become your own savior.

Think Fresh.
CKFresh is offline  
Old 07-08-2008, 05:19 PM   #15
philabramoff
Exiled Packerfan in SoCal
 
philabramoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 537
philabramoff is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CKFresh View Post
Phil, I'm off work, I'll get back to you later tonight.

Later mate.
Aces.

philabramoff is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nice and Naughty list for 2006... BigBuddhaPup The Lounge 48 01-03-2007 04:16 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:03 PM.