« January 2008 | Main | March 2008 »

February 29, 2008

The NFL Coaching Tree 2008 (Pt. 2)

Continued from The NFL Coaching Tree 2008 (Pt. 1)

Forests

Most of the league's head coaches trace their roots to one of four basic places: Ray Perkins and the 1980s Giants (Bill Parcells Tree), Chuck Noll's Steel Curtain Dynasty (Tony Dungy Tree), Marty Schottenheimer (his own tree and the Bill Cowher Tree), or Bill Walsh and the 1980s 49ers (Mike Holmgren and George Seifert Trees). Is there something bigger, something to tie those trees together? Yes.

Pardon me for stretching the "tree" analogy, but today's most prominent coaching trees grew in two coaching forests: those of Paul Brown and Sid Gillman. I hope you'll understand, though, why I think it's important to include a third "forest" — that of Steve Owen.

The Steve Owen Forest

Steve Owen coached the New York Giants from 1930-53, winning two NFL championships and more than 150 games. Owen is credited with inventing the "Umbrella Defense" — a system that became the basis for today's 4-3 defensive set.

The Jim Lee Howell Coaching Tree

After playing for Owen in the 1930s and '40s, Howell succeeded his old coach in 1954. His own head coaching career, although it yielded a championship in 1956 and a pair of losses to the famous Colts teams of Weeb Ewbank and John Unitas, is most remarkable for the assistants he hired. Howell's defensive coordinator was future Cowboys coach Tom Landry. His offensive coordinator, who would go on to win five NFL Championships as head coach of the Packers, was Vince Lombardi.

Vince Lombardi — I've placed him in the Howell Tree, but Lombardi also has ties to Sleepy Jim Crowley and Frank Leahy (as a player at Fordham University), plus Red Blaik (as a coach for Army). Sid Gillman and Lombardi were both assistants for Blaik in the late 1940s.

Forrest Gregg — His playing career, as a Hall of Fame offensive tackle, included 13 seasons with Lombardi and one with Tom Landry. During his head coaching career with the Bengals, Gregg oversaw the development of fellow Hall of Famer Anthony Muñoz and led the team to an appearance in Super Bowl XVI. Current head coaches Tom Coughlin and Dick Jauron both served as assistants on Gregg's staff in Green Bay.

The Tom Landry Coaching Tree

He played defensive back for both Owen and Howell, later coaching for Howell. Landry, a Hall of Fame coach for Dallas, won two Super Bowls in the 1970s and was one of the most important offensive and defensive innovators of the 1950s and '60s.

Mike Ditka — During his career as a tight end, Ditka played for two Hall of Fame coaches: George Halas in Chicago, and Landry in Dallas. He continued to work with both of them after his retirement as a player, spending nine seasons as an assistant to Landry before Halas hired him as head coach of the Bears. Ditka coached Jeff Fisher for three seasons, and his staff in Chicago included future head coaches Steve Mariucci and Dave McGinnis.

Dick Nolan — He played defensive back for both Howell and Landry, then spent another six seasons as an assistant coach for Landry. He later served as head coach of both the 49ers and Saints. His son, Mike Nolan, coaches the Niners today.

Dan Reeves — Played running back for Landry in Dallas and later served as his offensive coordinator. Reeves has connections to Gary Kubiak, Mike Nolan, Wade Phillips, and Mike Shanahan.

Active Head Coaches in the Steve Owen Coaching Forest — Mike Nolan

Second-Hand ConnectionsTom Coughlin, Jeff Fisher, Dick Jauron, Gary Kubiak, Wade Phillips, Mike Shanahan

Steve Owen Tree
[Click to expand]

The Sid Gillman Forest

Sid Gillman coached the Rams for five years in the late 1950s, the Chargers for their first nine seasons, and the Oilers for two years in the 1970s. Gillman revolutionized coaching tactics and forever changed NFL offenses, emphasizing vertical passing in a way the league had never seen before. Among those who picked up his offense were Don Coryell (future coach of the Cardinals and Chargers), Al Davis (long-time owner of the Raiders), and Chuck Noll (who coached the Steelers to four Super Bowl victories).

His own mentor was Francis "Close the Gates of Mercy" Schmidt, for whom he played at Ohio State.

Bum Phillips — He was a defensive assistant to Gillman in the 1960s and '70s, with both the Chargers and Oilers. Unsurprisingly, this puts his son Wade Phillips in Gillman's forest.

Dick Vermeil — This is a bit weird. Gillman was an assistant to Vermeil, rather than the other way around. Clearly, though, it was Gillman's offensive philosophy that Vermeil adopted, consistently hiring those who ran Gillman's offense, such as Mike Martz and Al Saunders. Sealing the deal, Vermeil didn't spend much time working for anyone else. He spent one season as an assistant to George Allen, another with Chuck Knox, and worked for Tommy Prothro for two years. Gillman's influence is clear, even if their working relationship was a bit unusual.

The George Allen Coaching Tree

It's misleading to put him here. Allen's primary influence was undoubtedly George Halas, the legendary coach and owner of the Bears, for whom he worked from 1958-65, including several years as Chicago's defensive coordinator. But Gillman gave Allen his first NFL coaching job — with the Rams in 1957 — and I don't have a Halas Tree (yes, I feel bad about this), so Allen is here.

Marv Levy — Allen emphasized special teams more than any other coach the game has seen, to the point that he hired the first special teams coach in NFL history (Dick Vermeil). Levy was the second, working for Allen in both Los Angeles and Washington. Among Levy's own legacies is that Wade Phillips was his defensive coordinator in Buffalo, and former Chargers coach Bobby Ross was on his staff in Kansas City. Bill Walsh was an assistant to Levy at Cal in the early 1960s.

Ted Marchibroda — A long-time assistant to Allen, he was also Levy's offensive coordinator in Buffalo. Active head coaches with ties to Marchibroda include Marvin Lewis, Eric Mangini, and Ken Whisenhunt.

Jack Pardee — After playing for Allen in both Los Angeles and Washington, he spent more than a decade as an NFL head coach with the Bears, Washington, and finally the Houston Oilers, where his defensive coordinator was current Titans HC Jeff Fisher.

The Don Coryell Coaching Tree

Don Coryell coached both the Cardinals and the Chargers, and it is telling that despite a 42-27-1 record in St. Louis (.607 winning percentage), he is more famous for his work in San Diego. Coaching future Hall of Famers like Dan Fouts, Charlie Joiner, and Kellen Winslow, Coryell coordinated an offense that no one could seem to stop. The Chargers led the NFL in total yards four seasons in a row and in passing offense five seasons in a row; those accomplishments are unequaled in the Modern Era.

Joe Gibbs — He played and coached for Coryell at San Diego State, then served as Coryell's assistant with both the Cardinals and Chargers. Gibbs himself mentored former head coach Joe Bugel.

Al Saunders — His three-year head-coaching career was not productive, but Saunders has been one of the most influential offensive coaches of the last 30 years. He was an assistant to Coryell at San Diego State and with the Chargers, then went on to serve as either offensive coordinator or assistant head coach to Marty Schottenheimer, Mike Martz, Dick Vermeil, and Joe Gibbs. He is also the new offensive coordinator in St. Louis.

Ernie Zampese — The only person listed here who has never been an NFL head coach, Zampese is too important to ignore. He was an assistant to Coryell (1967-75, 1979-86) and John Robinson (1987-91), a mentor to Norv Turner, and an offensive consultant to Joe Gibbs and Mike Martz.

The Al Davis Coaching Tree

Al Davis is a unique figure in the history of professional football. During his career in football, Davis has been a personnel assistant, scout, assistant coach, head coach, general manager, league commissioner, and principal owner and chief executive officer of a team. Davis won AFL Coach of the Year in 1963, was one of the driving forces behind the AFL-NFL merger that created the modern league, and has owned and run the Raiders for more than 30 years. He was an offensive assistant to Gillman with the Chargers, and he has consistently shaped the Raiders as a down-the-field passing offense, like Gillman's.

John Madden — Another coach with multiple ties to Gillman, Madden learned from Norm Van Brocklin — Gillman's old quarterback with the Rams — before joining Coryell at San Diego State. Three years later, Al Davis offered him a job with the Raiders.

Tom Flores — A Davis man through and through, Flores was the Raiders' quarterback during Davis' three years as the team's head coach, then an assistant to John Madden, and finally was hired by Davis to be the Raiders' head coach following Madden's retirement. He coached the team to victories in Super Bowls XV and XVIII. Former Washington and Cleveland coach Terry Robiskie is a Davis/Flores protege.

Art Shell — The Hall of Fame tackle played in the Raider organization for 15 seasons, including all 10 seasons of Madden's head coaching career and another four under Flores. Shell himself coached the Raiders from 1989-94 and again in 2006.

THE BILL WALSH BRANCH

Bill Walsh — Conventional wisdom places Walsh in the legendary Paul Brown Coaching Tree, since Walsh was an assistant to Brown for eight seasons. But everything else, including Walsh's offensive philosophies and personal statements — he hated Brown and has publicly credited Davis as his biggest influence — indicates that this is where he belongs.

Dennis Green — He was an assistant for Walsh both at Stanford and with the 49ers. Green's contribution to this branch of the coaching tree includes former head coaches Brian Billick, Jim Fassel, and Mike Tice, plus current Rams HC Scott Linehan, who is part of the Mike Tice Coaching Twig. Green also has secondary connections to Tony Dungy (his defensive coordinator in Minnesota) and, through Billick, to everyone associated with Marvin Lewis.

Mike Holmgren — Holmgren's coaching tree has considerably diminished in stature recently, but this is still an important addition to the Bill Walsh branch of Gillman's coaching forest.

George Seifert — Walsh's defensive coordinator and successor in San Francisco, he led the 49ers to wins in Super Bowls XXIV and XXIX. Seifert's assistants included Jeff Fisher, Holmgren, Gary Kubiak, Ray Rhodes, and Mike Shanahan.

Bill Walsh Tree
[Click to expand]

The John Robinson Coaching Tree

I'll be honest, I'm not sure where to put Robinson. He was an assistant to Madden in 1975. Robinson hired Norv Turner and Zampese as offensive assistants while he was coach of the Rams. His single biggest influence may have been Len Casanova, but Robinson has so many connections to the Sid Gillman Forest that he needs to be here.

Mike Martz — I haven't gone through exact numbers, but including his college coaching career, Mike Martz may have worked for more head coaches than anyone else in history. He's a student of the true West Coast Offense run by Gillman and Coryell, and his most immediate influence is Norv Turner.

Norv Turner — Some fans are puzzled that Turner keeps getting good coaching jobs, and I suspect many readers will be equally puzzled at the frequency with which Turner's name has appeared in this study (12 times before we even got to this entry). To understand this, you must realize that Turner is now the only major practitioner of the Gillman/Coryell offense remaining in the NFL. This was the most dynamic offense in football for most of the 1960s and '70s, into the early '80s, and although it seems to be dying out now — replaced by Walsh's short-passing offense — you can see the legendary names attached to it (Coryell, Davis, Gibbs, Madden) and understand why some people still have faith in this style of offense. It's also a lot more exciting than a bunch of five-yard passes, and if you've ever been bored out of your mind watching a Walsh-style West Coast Offense, Martz and Turner are your guys.

Active Head Coaches in the Sid Gillman Coaching Forest — Brad Childress, Jon Gruden, John Harbaugh, Mike Holmgren, Dick Jauron, Gary Kubiak, Scott Linehan, Mike McCarthy, Wade Phillips, Andy Reid, Mike Shanahan, Norv Turner, Jim Zorn

Second-hand ConnectionsJack Del Río, Tony Dungy, Jeff Fisher, John Fox, Lane Kiffin, Marvin Lewis, Rod Marinelli, Mike Nolan, Sean Payton, Lovie Smith, Mike Tomlin

Sid Gilman Tree
[Click to expand]

The Paul Brown Forest

Paul Brown is the father of modern professional football. He was the first Modern Era coach to racially integrate his squad, the first coach to regularly call plays for his offense, and the first to hold classroom practice sessions. The list goes on (modern pass-blocking techniques and the quarterback "pocket") and on (year-round coaching staffs and positional coaches) and on.

Blanton Collier — Most famous for succeeding two of the greatest coaches in history, Paul "Bear" Bryant at the University of Kentucky and Paul Brown in Cleveland. Collier was an assistant to Brown for eight seasons before his own head coaching career began. Collier probably wasn't a formative influence on any major coaching trees, but he has many important secondary connections, and his assistants included Bill Arnsparger, Howard Schnellenberger, Chuck Knox, and Don Shula.

Bud Grant — The coach who took Minnesota to four Super Bowls (and the Winnipeg Blue Bombers of the CFL to six Grey Cups) played for Brown at Great Lakes Naval Station, and for former Giants coach Allie Sherman in Winnipeg.

Chuck Noll — His seven-year playing career was spent under Brown, and he spent three years as an assistant to Shula. Noll also has significant ties to the Sid Gillman forest, though, based on six seasons as an assistant with the Chargers. Noll was the primary influence on both Tony Dungy and John Fox, as well as current Indianapolis offensive coordinator Tom Moore.

The Weeb Ewbank Coaching Tree

Ewbank was an assistant to Brown at Great Lakes Naval Station, served as his line coach for the Browns, and was a fellow grad of Miami University in Ohio. He coached the Colts to two championships and the Jets to an upset win in Super Bowl III.

Chuck Knox — He worked for Blanton Collier at Kentucky, then got his first professional coaching job from Ewbank. Former head coaches Jim Haslett, Mike Martz, and Mike Tice all have ties to Knox.

Buddy Ryan — Ewbank's defensive line coach in New York, he also worked for Bud Grant in Minnesota and Mike Ditka in Chicago. Ryan's coaching tree includes Titans coach Jeff Fisher and former head coaches Dave McGinnis and Gregg Williams.

The Don Shula Coaching Tree

How many connections to Paul Brown can one man have? Shula played for Brown and Ewbank, and he coached for Collier. Shula's Tree is also the cradle of today's 3-4 defensive coaches.

Bill Arnsparger — Like Shula, he was on Collier's staff at Kentucky before moving to the NFL. Arnsparger was a defensive assistant for Shula in both Baltimore (1964-69) and Miami (1970-73, 76-82). Arnsparger was also defensive coordinator for the Charger team that played in Super Bowl XXIX. Among his most significant contributions to the game — as if coaching on seven teams that played for a championship isn't enough — is that Arnsparger gave Marty Schottenheimer his first NFL coaching job.

Ray Perkins — I don't know how accurate it is to put the Bill Parcells and Marty Schottenheimer Coaching Trees in Paul Brown's forest, but Arnsparger and Perkins belong here. Perkins, who hired Parcells, Bill Belichick, and Romeo Crennel, played for Shula in Baltimore. His other significant influences were Bear Bryant, Chuck Fairbanks, and Don Coryell.

Active Head Coaches in the Paul Brown Coaching Forest — Bill Belichick, Tom Coughlin, Romeo Crennel, Jack Del Río, Tony Dungy, Herm Edwards, Jeff Fisher, John Fox, Lane Kiffin, Marvin Lewis, Eric Mangini, Rod Marinelli, Sean Payton, Tony Sparano, Lovie Smith, Mike Smith, Mike Tomlin, Ken Whisenhunt

Second-hand ConnectionsDick Jauron, Mike McCarthy, Wade Phillips

Paul Brown Tree
[Click to expand]

Bringing It All Together

Sid Gillman and Paul Brown, both of whom began their NFL coaching careers in the 1950s, remain relevant in today's game through the coaches they tutored. Where do these giants — the forests that contain the game's most vibrant coaching trees — intersect?

Bill Walsh — It should be no surprise that the most influential coach of the last 30 years has roots with both Brown (eight years as an assistant with the Bengals) and Gillman (he's on the Al Davis Coaching Tree).

Chuck Noll — The only head coach in history with four Super Bowl victories, Noll worked directly with both Brown (seven years as a player) and Gillman (six years as an assistant coach with the Chargers).

Ray Perkins — The man who hired Bill Parcells, Bill Belichick, and Romeo Crennel played for Don Shula (Paul Brown Forest) and coached for Don Coryell (Sid Gillman Forest).

Miami University — Miami of Ohio, as it's usually called today, produced — among many others — Paul Brown, Sid Gillman, and Red Blaik (mentor to both Gillman and Vince Lombardi).

Complete Tree
[Click to expand]

Gross Simplification

The four maxims below are not 100% accurate, but they can serve as a general guide to today's head coaches and their roots.

1. Today's defensive-minded coaches, if they use a 4-3 defensive alignment, are from the Tony Dungy Branch of the Chuck Noll Tree, in the Paul Brown Forest.

2. Today's defensive-minded coaches, if they use a 3-4 defensive alignment, are from the Don Shula Tree in the Paul Brown Forest. This tree includes Bill Parcells, Marty Schottenheimer, Bill Belichick, and Bill Cowher.

3. Today's offensive-minded coaches, unless they are Norv Turner, are from the Bill Walsh Branch of the Al Davis Tree, in the Sid Gillman Forest.

4. Today's offensive-minded coaches, if they do not use Walsh's "West Coast" Offense, are from the Don Coryell Tree, in the Sid Gillman Forest.

More broadly, offensive coaches probably trace their roots to Sid Gillman, while defensive coaches probably trace their roots to Paul Brown or Steve Owen.

The Pro Football Hall of Fame

Fourteen of the former coaches mentioned in this study are in the Hall of Fame. Those coaches are listed here with their coaching trees and Hall of Fame presenters.

George Allen — George Halas Tree, includes Marv Levy, Ted Marchibroda, and Jack Pardee; HOF presenter was Deacon Jones (player)

Marv Levy — George Halas Tree, George Allen Branch, includes Bobby Ross; HOF presenter was Bill Polian (executive)

Steve Owen — Steve Owen Forest, includes Jim Lee Howell Tree and Tom Landry Tree; HOF presenter was Mel Hein (player)

Vince Lombardi — Steve Owen Forest, Jim Lee Howell Tree, includes Forrest Gregg; HOF presenter was Wellington Mara (executive)

Tom Landry — Steve Owen Forest, includes Mike Ditka, Dick Nolan, and Dan Reeves; HOF presenter was Roger Staubach (player)

Sid Gillman — Sid Gillman Forest, includes Don Coryell Tree, Al Davis Tree and Bill Walsh Branch, John Robinson Tree, and Bum Phillips; HOF presenter was Joe Madro (asst. coach)

Joe Gibbs — Sid Gillman Forest, Don Coryell Tree, includes Joe Bugel; HOF presenter was Coryell

John Madden — Sid Gillman Forest, Al Davis Tree; HOF presenter was Davis

Bill Walsh — Sid Gillman Forest, Al Davis Tree, includes Dennis Green, Mike Holmgren, and George Seifert; HOF presenter was Eddie DeBartolo, Jr. (executive)

Paul Brown — Paul Brown Forest, includes Weeb Ewbank Tree, Don Shula Tree, Blanton Collier, Bud Grant, and Chuck Noll; HOF presenter was Otto Graham (player)

Bud Grant — Paul Brown Forest; HOF presenter was Sid Hartman (journalist)

Chuck Noll — Paul Brown Forest, includes Tony Dungy Tree and John Fox; HOF presenter was Dan Rooney (executive)

Weeb Ewbank — Paul Brown Forest, includes Chuck Knox; HOF presenter was Brown

Don Shula — Paul Brown Forest, includes Bill Arnsparger and Ray Perkins; HOF presenters were Dave and Mike Shula (family)

Note: Al Davis is also in the Hall of Fame, but as what the Hall calls a contributor rather than as a coach. His HOF presenter was John Madden. Mike Ditka is in the Hall of Fame as a player rather than as a coach. His HOF presenter was teammate Ed O’Bradovich.

I hope you've found this study both helpful and interesting. If you notice any errors or omissions, please notify me in the comments section. My goal in this study was to create the most comprehensive NFL Coaching Tree ever assembled, and in a project of this scope, mistakes are almost inevitable. Please recognize, though, that my focus remains fixed on today's coaches, as well as a few of the most significant coaches of yesteryear. I know I don't have George Halas or Curly Lambeau or Greasy Neale. But I've tried to include every contemporary head coach (plus a few of the hottest prospects) and all of coaches who influenced them. I welcome your comments, but please don't complain that someone like Harry Gilmer or Ken Meyer isn't included here.

All diagrams and illustrations of coaching trees that accompany this study were created by Brad Oremland and Lisa Fuller.

Visit BetFirms.com for the best in football betting information, including the latest NFL odds and lines.

Posted by Brad Oremland at 11:52 AM | Comments (7)

Sports Q&A: 40-Times and Petty Crimes

Lawrence from Little Rock, AR writes, "NFL Network covered 26 hours of the NFL Draft Combine in Indianapolis. Can a bunch of sprints and jumps really indicate a players potential quality?"

Wow! Twenty-six hours of video footage that's subject to limited viewership? Sounds like a collection from the New England Patriots underground video vault. But just as fastidiously as Bill Belichick watches the seemingly irrelevant movements of a St. Louis Rams walk-through, there are viewers watching with wide-eyed amazement as potential NFL draft picks are put through mental and physical tests that quantify their capacity to be athletes and/or good citizens.

Of course, good citizenship alone won't get you drafted, but as the NFL Combine, or the adult film industry, for that matter, has proved again and again, incredible physical feats always overrides even the most obvious absence of mental aptitude. So you could be the biggest dummy in the room, but if your clean and jerk is impressive enough, then you'll have a job in the NFL, or in the adult film industry, for that matter.

A lot of fans watch the combine just because it's on, not necessarily because they want to. But once you watch, you can't help but be sucked in to the drama and intrigue of measures of strength and speed, such as the 40-yard dash, the vertical jump, the broad jump, the bench press, the three-cone drill, the 20-yard shuttle, and the 60-yard shuttle. These are simply the physical measures of players' abilities.

But can these really give teams an accurate measure of how an athlete will perform as professionals? Truly beneficial tests would include the '200-yard dash from the cops,' or the '3-stripper drill,' or the '80-yard shuttle from the holding cell to the fingerprint station,' or the 'bouncer sucker-punch.' And everyone knows that a legitimate '40' measurement is the time it takes to down 40 ounces of liquor and toss the empty bottle at a road sign, all while maintaining a speed of 90 or above. For additional insight, the urine test offers great results, indicating how well a prospect can urinate in public without being seen. There is more to becoming a solid NFL player than just some token times, distances, and repetitions. A flawless recitation of the alphabet, backwards, with a flashlight shining in your eyes? That's when you know that your game is ready for the next level.

Unfortunately, player weigh-ins are no longer televised. This has to be upsetting to NFL purists, as well as boxing promoter and world-class buffoon Don King, who's never seen a weigh-in in which he couldn't stage a confrontation. Obviously, some chubby lineman complained that they felt embarrassed by the spectacle of being weighed in public. The names of these players should be red-flagged immediately by prospective drafters.

Part of being a successful offensive or defensive linemen in the NFL is the utter disregard for your physical appearance. If obese linemen were concerned with their disheveled and sloppy appearance, then Dan Dierdorf wouldn't be in the Hall of Fame, and Tony Siragussa wouldn't have the nerve to engulf NFL sidelines and spout cartoonish commentary. Personally, I think all players should wear two-piece bikinis to the weigh-in, and their personality tests should be administered then and there. Scouts would have their answers immediately about players' ability to maintain their composure under the most embarrassing of circumstances. I'm guessing Pacman Jones would have pulled a piece from his bikini top and fired off a few warning shots. And the Titans would have been impressed.

If the weigh-ins and height measurements do nothing else, at least they offer the truth. That was especially the case when California wide receiver DeSean Jackson, listed throughout his college career at a towering 6,' was revealed to be a mere 5'9". It had to be the most talked-about instance of a Jackson losing three inches off the top since Michael Jackson's jeri-curled 'do went up in flames back in 1984. Suddenly, Jackson's price tag went down, and suddenly, Danny DeVito doesn't seem so short.

Let's not forget the NFL Network's coverage is hosted by Rich Eisen, and who can pass up a chance to watch a show hosted by Eisen? I can't. On a network known for badly-announced regular-season games and exclusive features like "Put Up Your Dukes," 26 hours of the NFL Combine looks pretty inviting. How did Jamie Dukes get his own show? I believe, first, someone at the NFL Network came up with a clever title for a show, then they hired Dukes. Let's be thankful Andy Dick doesn't have his own show on the network.

But the best thing about the NFL Network's coverage of the Combine: no Mel Kiper, Jr. It must kill Kiper not to be able to voice his opinions and show off his Eddie Munster hairdo directly to the NFL Network viewers. But, as always, Kiper will have his say elsewhere, and his mock draft will continue to change by the minute. The NFL Network's Mike Mayock is just as capable of over-analysis as Kiper, and he's got a regular hairstyle.

When all is said and done, the Combine will be history, and the information gathered will raise the draft status of some, and lower it for others. But the real questions about a player's ability to handle the rigors of the pro game can't be answered until that player faces the tough situations inherent to football, like criminal charges. Until the Combine vastly changes its testing procedures, these answers will be clouded among useless numbers and statistics. In the meantime, Roger Goodell should have his appointment calendar readily available.

Get Your Questions Answered!

Do you have a question or comment? Did you perjure yourself and forget to wear a diaper? Do you have a fear of presidential candidates whose names rhyme with "Obama?" Are you oozing machismo, and can't get it to stop? Then send your demands/concerns/questions along with your name and hometown to [email protected].

Posted by Jeffrey Boswell at 11:50 AM | Comments (1)

February 28, 2008

The Sports Announcer Column (Pt. 1)

This will not be the first time I have written about announcers in this space, but it is the first one I have written having realized that I have a very clear criteria of what makes a good announcer in my book: an iconic voice. Sounds pretty shallow, eh? Yet, I don't really listen to the announcers too much, and I bet you don't, either.

We don't need the announcer to tell us that it's 2nd-and-10, or if he noticed that Adrian Peterson just made a great run. We might pay slightly more attention to the analysts, but even then, there's more than enough "You want to get a first down here because it can help build momentum," for you to start turning them out.

So what that means is I value a voice that provides good background music to the game. This criteria is highly, highly subjective. A voice that is music to me might grate you terribly. With that out of the way, my icons are the following:

1. Pat Summerall

There will never be another like him. He was truly the voice of football. He was the voice. He never showed any emotion. His deadpan, just-the-facts delivery will always resonate in my mind. "Touchdown, 49ers." "Interference, and he caught it anyway."

He should've left the game being triumphantly hoisted on the shoulders of others, but instead, he is merely fading away. He retired in 2001, and then unretired a year later to just do Cowboy and Texan regional telecasts, close to his home.

Since then, he's strictly been a mop-up man, filling in where needed. He covered for Mike Patrick at ESPN in 2004 when Patrick recovered from heart surgery, and has been an emergency substitute teacher of sorts for FOX a few times after that, most recently when he called the Bengals/Rams game just this past December.

Now, I realize this is probably his call. I imagine that he doesn't mind working occasionally, but at 77, doesn't really have it in him anymore to work week in and week out. I also realize that his age shows in his broadcasts. He occasionally seems to get behind or make mistakes that are gently corrected by his booth partners or producers.

I don't care. They let Harry Caray broadcast until he died, but he was already really hard to listen to the last few years, when he sounded out-of-it and confused.

I'd like the same for Summerall, for him to still find work until he dies. I think he's earned that work-as-long-as-you-want golden ticket. I never catch these games where he materializes to be the emergency longman for the network's 13th commentating crew or whatever, but I hope to before he hangs it up for good. We need to give this man a proper goodbye, but we also have to appreciate that he's still calling games every now and then.

2. Vin Scully

He's another one that is now quite old (80), but is still logging part-time duty as the radio announcer for Dodger home games and road games west of the Rockies. He became my baseball iconic voice as the lead NBC baseball announcer from 1983 to 1989.

3. Keith Jackson

Whoa, Nelly!!! Would rather hear him call a college football game than anyone else. Hidden behind the folksy aphorisms was the fact that he was very articulate, smooth, and clever. He's yet another one that went from national work to regional to cut down on travel before hanging it up altogether.

4. Chris Cuthbert

He's the only guy on this list that is not retired and not nearing retirement. Unfortunately, he's the only one here that most Americans never heard of and likely never will.

Longtime readers know that I prefer the CFL for my offseason football fix, and Cuthbert is the lead announcer for Canadian sports station TSN, whose CFL product is made available in the U.S. on regional sports networks.

I've only been watching the CFL for a couple years, but he somehow struck a chord with me right away. Here's a YouTube sample of him, if you want to judge for yourself. As an aside, he works well with his broadcast partner, whose name escapes me, but the Canadian announcers seems much more willing to criticize and be frank in their analysis, which is evident in the clip at around the one-minute mark ("Oh! You know, I just hate the call. I just hate the call." "Yep.").

Cuthbert is also a big-time NHL announcer, and was part of NBC's NHL broadcast team the last couple of years. Now that NBC has trimmed their NHL schedule down to a single weekly game, he's on the sidelines in terms of American broadcasting, waiting to mop-up if needed. Along, I suppose, with Summerall.

Posted by Kevin Beane at 11:53 AM | Comments (1)

Globalization or De-Americanization?

I've been looking for a good professional tennis story to write. I thought that maybe a nice article on Kei Nishikori, the Florida-based, Japanese 18-year-old superstar of the moment would be perfect after his totally unexpected win at Delray Beach. Then I read a column by long-time tennis writer Peter Bodo. Peter thinks that the globalization of tennis is ruining the sport. I agree that my sport of choice is not heading in a direction I think it needs to, but the cause isn't globalization.

Mr. Bodo laments the shift toward a more uniform playing surface. I'll join him in that. In my time on this earth, I have seen the game go from one played on a serious diversity of surfaces to three basic surface materials (all with a very clay-like bounce.) The fact that the All England Lawn Tennis Club (AELTC) has been slowing down the grass and even changed the grass blend continues to be a disappointment to me. The move was heralded as a means to give clay court specialists, aka "dirt ballers," a better chance of moving through the tournament.

In the past, that never mattered. It used to be that to be a great player you had to have an all-court game, you had to be able to be adaptable to different court surfaces. Rod Laver won on all surfaces. Bjorn Borg, Jimmy Connors, and even John McEnroe all were successful on all the court types. Even the legendary Bill Tilden adapted to different surfaces, and Tilden actually saw the move to a more uniform surface. He wrote in several of his classic tennis books how he believed a dirt surface would become the most preferred. It just took about 50 years longer then he thought.

I've written many a time that academy tennis was the single biggest contributor to the slow, downslope of the game. Yes, Peter, you are right, most of the players all have the same style. Blame that more on Nick Bollettieri than the court surface. It used to be you never went too far from home when learning tennis. So if you grew up on the East Coast, you played on more grass and indoor surfaces. Harry Hopman was the great teacher of choice. Grew up in the middle of the country and you found a lot of clay. Grew up in California and everything was hard cement and high bounce.

But now you send your kids immediately to a large academy in Florida and everyone plays on the same surface, taught by the same coaches, and taught all the same basic everything. Where is the Japanese Mr. Kei Nishikori based out of? You guessed it, sunny Florida, land of the super academies. Yes, the lack of difference in styles makes the game boring to watch. Actually, without the new international faces, the game would be unwatchable.

I also find it interesting that Tennis Magazine itself this month basically features nothing but foreign players. Yes, there is the quick blurb about the U.S. Men defeating defending Davis Cup Champions Russia in the first round, but mostly articles about players like Ivo Karlovic, Nicole Vaidisova, etc. Clearly, the "globalization" sells magazines.

No, the biggest problem with the game is that there just isn't any superstar on the horizon coming from the ranks of America. Just think about World Cup Soccer. When the American team made a run a few years ago, everyone knew who was on the men's team, and they watched the World Cup even though they didn't know about anyone on the French, Italian, or Korean teams. Same with the women. Mia Hamm? You got it. Now where is soccer? I agree, boring for me to watch, and the new captain of the U.S. women's team is from my town. David Beckham won't make soccer much bigger here, either.

Yes, tennis has always been the most international professional sport. Rod Laver, John Newcombe, René Lacoste, Fred Perry, Ken Rosewall, Ilie Nastase, and Bjorn Borg all came from somewhere other than the USA. They were always balanced by Bill Tilden, Pancho Gonzalez, Jack Kramer, Arthur Ashe, Connors, McEnroe, Andre Agassi, and Pete Sampras. Same on the women's side. For every Margaret Court-Smith, there was a Billie Jean King. For Evonne Goolagong, there was Chrissie Evert.

The largest amount of money spent on tennis (both recreational and professional) is still in the U.S. To this day, the bulk of most tennis companies' sales are still in the U.S. Babolat was a long, storied company in the string business. It wasn't until they launched racquets in the U.S. that they became a major force in the game. The largest retailers of tennis equipment are in the U.S. Heck, even Tournagrip, that pesky blue overwrap, is marketed using Pete Sampras and he retired and nearly disappeared from the game. Don't Europeans buy overwrap?

Maybe it's the fall of the Iron Curtain. There is a lot to be said for great rivalry. Who could ever forget the U.S. men's hockey gold medal win and the "Miracle on Ice?" It would never have been possible without the great divergence of communism and democracy. The us versus them mentality driven by cultural and political differences used to fuel a lot of great sports and television drama. Now all that has gone away. Communism is no longer the "great evil" it once was. The influx of foreign players into all sports, and even more so in tennis directly from the fall of communism, means it's no longer us against them, but it's more of a global group hug. Sports needs drama. Sports needs a winner-take-all mentality. Tennis just currently doesn't have any.

I agree with Mr. Bobo, the push of the game toward other parts of the globe will not benefit the game in the long-run. Not unless the U.S. finds the next Connors, McEnroe, Sampras, Agassi, King, or Evert. WTA CEO Larry Scott will do well in the short-term. He's moving the action to where the money is for today. Long-term, the money always will be here. Let's hope the game of professional tennis lasts until the powers that be understand.

Posted by Tom Kosinski at 11:38 AM | Comments (2)

NASCAR Top 10 Power Rankings: Week 2

Note: the quotes in this article are fictional.

1. Kyle Busch — Busch led 14 laps in the rain-delayed Auto Club 500 and survived a brush with the wall on lap 114 to finish fourth. He led as late as lap 150, but fell to the advances of Jimmie Johnson, Jeff Gordon, and eventual winner Carl Edwards. Busch now leads the Sprint Cup points standings by six points, which is the first time a Toyota driver has topped the points.

"I do more with the Interstate Batteries car by 9:00 AM than J.J. Yeley did in a career," says Busch. "And I'm also pretty handy in a Nationwide series car, as well as a Craftman truck. Put me in a Sherman tank, and I'd be the No. 1 driver at Michael Waltrip Racing. Shoot, if I'd been behind the wheel of a white Bronco, they'd still be looking for O.J. Simpson."

2. Jimmie Johnson — Starting on the pole after a washed-out qualifying, Johnson led a race-high 76 laps, but had no answer for the Roush Fenway-powered Ford of Carl Edwards, who passed Johnson with about 15 laps to go. Johnson finished second, an impressive rebound from his 27th at Daytona.

"I've got to hand it to Fox TV for trying their darndest to get this race completed on Sunday," says Johnson. "But that rain was as persistent as the lack of creativity of the drivers who were asked to name that blasted gopher running the 'Gopher-Cam.' Who wants to see a ground-level view of cars speeding by at 180 miles per hour? Practically useless. Heck, you might as well put a camera in the exhaust pipe, or in a public restroom frequented by an itchy-fingered George Michael and call it the 'Wham Cam.' Now that's entertainment. Anyway, what makes FOX think a gopher is the most talented filmmaker in the rodent family. Personally, I'm much more partial to beaver shots."

3. Tony Stewart — Stewart finished sixth in California, then hopped in his Nationwide ride and picked up his second consecutive Nationwide Series win. Stewart remains third in the Nextel standings, 19 behind leader and teammate Kyle Busch.

"It was a grueling weekend," says Stewart. "But overall, I'd say it was a great success. I'm fat and happy. On that note, I'd like to congratulate Subway's Jared Fogle for 10 years of not being a fat slob. By the way, Jared, those pants fit comfortably over my No. 20 Home Depot Toyota. Come to think of it, at my current rate of growth, those pants will soon fit comfortably on me."

4. Jeff Gordon — While running third on the final lap, Gordon's engine blew, bringing out the race's final caution. Luckily for Gordon, NASCAR rules mandate that the field is frozen when the caution flies. Thus, he held on to his third-place finish, and
improved 24 places in the points to 12th.

"What's this?" asks Gordon. "I finish third in the Auto Club 500, and all I get is this lousy t-shirt that says 'Free Robbie Gordon.' Well, I'll try my best to free Robbie, and I'll even throw in a vote for Pedro. As for Robbie, I believe he's sporting the 'I'm With Stupid' t-shirt in honor of the idiot who sent him the unapproved front bumper cover."

5. Carl Edwards — Edwards took charge late at Fontana's 2-mile oval, passing Jimmie Johnson on lap 234 and cruising to victory in his Roush Fenway Ford. Edwards celebrated with his typical backflip, and stuck the landing despite unsure footing caused by water seeping from the "weepers." Edwards then capped his backflip with a fist in the air.

"It's got nothing to do with 'Black Power,' says Edwards. "I just like seeing 'Matt cower.' Kenseth is still a little squeamish from our incident last year. Why, just the other day in a team meeting, I simply raised my hand to ask a question, and Matt wet himself. Not only is he sponsored by DeWalt Tools, he is a DeWalt tool."

6. Ryan Newman — Apparently, the manifestation of God's omnipotence in the form of a push from No. 2 Miller Lite Dodge does not occur on Monday's. Newman didn't get the 'push from God' that supposedly powered him to his Daytona victory. Still, the Lord saw fit for Newman to finish tenth and lead three laps in the Auto Club 500.

"And on the seventh day," says Newman, "God said, 'Boogity, boogity, boogity! Let there be racing!' But, it seems, God, like the majority of fans in Fontana, couldn't hang around for a Monday finish. By golly, we sure could have used some fiery hail to dry that track out on Sunday. NASCAR probably would have made us race in that as well. As it was, you could count on two hands the number of fans there on Monday. Sad, but still, that beat the number of moviegoers that braved ridicule for the opening weekend of Larry The Cable Guy's new offering, Witless Protection."

7. Kurt Busch — Busch ran out of fuel on lap 123 and fell a lap down, but recovered with a few strategic pit stops to finish 13th. He is now fourth in the points, 36 behind younger brother Kyle.

"Hey, my time in California was much like the heavyweight unification bout between Wladimir Klitschko and Sultan Ibragimov," says Busch. "No one got punched."

8. Kasey Kahne — Kahne put the Dale Earnhardt Incorporated Budweiser Chevy (or the Evernham Bud Dodge, but that sounds like Kahne---boring) in the top 10 for the second-straight race, following his seventh at Daytona with a ninth in the Auto Club 500. He is sixth in the Sprint Cup points standings, 41 out of first.

"Hey, Teresa Earnhardt ain't so bad," says Kahne. "We have a lot in common. She fell into DEI ownership, and I fell into Budweiser sponsorship. And, oh yeah, neither one of us is blood related to Dale Earnhardt."

9. Matt Kenseth — Like his Roush Fenway brethren, Kenseth ran strong at California, finishing fifth as teammate and bully Carl Edwards won the race. Four Roush Fenway drivers led laps in the Auto Club 500, and this makes four California early season races in a row won by Roush Fenway racers. Kenseth won this race in 2006 and 2007.

"I assume the comments about my 'nice intermediate package' were compliments," says Kenseth. "If you think that's something, you should see my huge manifold."

10. Dale Earnhardt, Jr. — On lap 21, Earnhardt smacked the No. 5 car of teammate Casey Mears, who bounced off the wall after hitting a slick spot. Earnhardt's No. 88 Hendrick Amp Energy Drink Chevrolet suffered severe damage, and he finished 40th, 47 laps off the pace.

"The one thing I feared most about joining a new team has reared its ugly head," says Earnhardt. "Hendrick-on-Hendrick violence. And I thought that was only a problem in the ghetto. Anyway, I was surprised that Tom Cruise, who was at the track, didn't attend to the accident, since, as a Scientologist, he's one of the few capable of actually helping. Anyway, I'm very disappointed with my finish, especially for my fans. Whether it's my male fans, the 'Amp-u-tees,' my lady fans, the 'Amp-u-tantes,' or my fans of undetermined gender, the 'Amp-biguous,' I always try to please them with a good finish."

Posted by Jeffrey Boswell at 11:05 AM | Comments (3)

February 27, 2008

A First-Hand Account of Cameron Indoor

Augusta National. Indianapolis Motor Speedway. Lambeau Field. Yankee Stadium. Fenway Park. The Rose Bowl. Wrigley Field.

All of these venues are adored, historic landmarks of sports in the United States that are all at least half a century old. This list, of course, is lacking a venue in the most original of popular American sports, basketball.

Sure, there has been a building called Madison Square Garden in Manhattan for well over a century, but the current structure was built in 1968, which makes Oakland Arena (or Oracle Arena if you want to please sponsors) the oldest arena in the NBA.

So, by far, the most logical basketball arena to place in my rudimentary "Ancient Wonders of American Sport" is Cameron Indoor Stadium, a venue I was fortunate enough to visit this past Saturday.

I had never been to Cameron before last weekend, but the building has been a sort of unknown legendary family member for my whole life.

When my Dad went to his first Duke home game in late 1975, the Duke program was in a lean time of sorts, winning only about a third of its conference games in the first six seasons of the decade. After making the NIT in 1971, the Blue Devils were 14-34 in ACC play and 49-55 overall for the next four seasons.

By my Dad's junior year, Duke had made an unexpected run to the national title game by upsetting Notre Dame, before falling to Kentucky.
(John Feinstein's book about the 1977-78 Blue Devils, Forever's Team, is an excellent read for any Duke or ACC fan. You might have to look on eBay or the used section of Amazon, however, as the book probably went out of print long ago.)

Countless stories from my Dad's four seasons among the "Crazies" have been told to me, and with many of those stories being told five, 10, or more times over.

While it is not a story per se, my father had also told of how small Cameron is and that it only holds about 8,000. I have known this fact ever since I was five, but the compact nature of one of the most heralded basketball arenas in the world was still a shock.

Usually, when you visit a college or university, the school's basketball arena is very noticeable. It's usually the building that looks most like a gym, has a higher roof and may be a different color or architecturally foreign to the rest of the campus.

Not so with Cameron Indoor Stadium.

If signs right outside the campus buildings were not present at Duke, one would likely see it as a large-sized classroom or dorm building until they found the box office on the side of the building.

If you enter into Cameron at any of the non-student entry ways (which you would, obviously), you enter through a doorway. And by doorway, I mean a typical doorway like you probably have many of in your house or apartment.

You then head up a stairway, taking you to the level of seats above the students. And by a stairway, I mean something that is probably narrower than what you have at your home or apartment.

In other words, if there was ever a diametrically opposite sports arena to Staples Center, the American Airlines Center, or any other 20,000-seat NBA arena built from about 1991 to now, it is surely Cameron Indoor Stadium.

My Dad and I sat in the next-to-last row of seats. In fact, we were a mere 15 feet or so from the press box where you always see the TV guys broadcasting from when doing a live shot during pre-game, halftime, or post-game. If you have ever wondered why it looks as if Mike Patrick and Dick Vitale have just ran 5Ks before doing said live shots, it is because it is quite warm in that part of the arena.

Duke's official website says that air conditioning was added before the 2001-02 season, but I didn't feel it. Of course, with temperatures going from the mid-40s on Friday in Durham to what felt like the mid-60s on Saturday afternoon, the air conditioning was probably off in anticipation for another cool day.

Last month, I was able to meet up with super-awesome basketball buddy Kyle Whelliston (of ESPN and Mid-Majority dot-coms fame) during his one yearly trip to the Dallas/Ft. Worth Metroplex. Lucky for me, he was at North Texas, my school, and at a game I would have gone to anyway against South Alabama.

Somehow during our halftime conversation, the minute detail of Duke getting RPI credit for a road win against UNC Greensboro last season at Greensboro Coliseum (despite the game being organized by Duke) came up. I mentioned my upcoming trip to him to which he said, "Make sure you bring seat cushions. The seats are really uncomfortable." Of course, I didn't and they were, as the guy who finds a way to go to 100+ college basketball games every season (now all mid-major games to boot) was clearly smarter than I. But this is not to complain, as I would rather have the atmosphere and uncomfortable seats than the other way around, as is often times the case at North Texas games (more on than later).

We sat in those seats about 50 minutes before tip-off, and of course, the students were almost all in place and cheering just about every three-pointer and flashy looking play that the Blue Devils made against their formidable warm-up opponent of air.

Obviously, the Cameron Crazies are the number one thing that makes the atmosphere so special. If somehow, the roles were reversed, and the season ticket holders and other paying customers got floor seats, while the students were relegated to the upper reaches of the arena, the atmosphere would likely suffer, but probably only slightly. Another factor that makes Cameron special is that the next to last row of seats in the entire building is a deceptively great seat. In contrast, going to Charlotte Hornets (I feel so old typing that) games in the mid-'90s and sitting in the next to last row of seats in a 24,000-seat arena was incredible, but not in a real good way.

Which brings me to the topic I teased a little earlier. At the school I attend, North Texas, the arena is 10,000 seats, which is way too big for a school that draws at a maximum 7,500 for a basketball game (and that's only when a basketball-conscious Big 12 team travels to play here). The school features a huge undergrad population of over 25,000 (although a fair portion of those are older, part-time students).

I know that every school can not be like Duke when it comes to passion for basketball, but for whatever reason, not a very big amount of my fellow students care about college basketball, or care about Sun Belt basketball in particular. Given, that number has grown since UNT went to the NCAA tournament last spring.

And being that I live in Texas, but am a transplant from the Carolinas, I guess I might never get why three or four times more people would show up for a football game between North Texas and Louisiana-Lafayette that truly means nothing in the grand scheme of Division I-A football than show up to see home basketball games against South Alabama and Western Kentucky, who both have good chances to be in the NCAA tournament come March 16.

Louisiana-Lafayette (or any other Sun Belt football team) will never have a chance to be in the BCS and play for a title, unless the talent level increases about threefold over the next decade (which it won't). But one Sun Belt team will always be six games from winning an NCAA Division I Basketball championship. And, uh, rant over.

You may have noticed that I haven't talked one bit about the actual game on Saturday. After two straight losses and facing a St. John's team that is one of the worst power conference teams in the nation, Duke was always going to trounce the Red Storm. I predicted a 25-point win, but the Blue Devils won by 30 in their yearly-misplaced late February non-conference game.

There were a few things, though, to notice about the blowout.

To focus on some of the game's semantics would be to lose the plot, as the trip was not as much about the 40 minutes on the court than the three hours I spent inside of college basketball's greatest theater.

Posted by Ross Lancaster at 11:52 AM | Comments (4)

Here Yesterday, Gone Today

Tuesday was the most hyped day so far in the National Hockey League not involving the playoffs (directly). At 3 PM Eastern Time, the NHL trade deadline arrived. The weeklong stream of steady prognostication on the pending disbursement of soon-to-be free agents, and the players and draft picks expendable enough to exchange for them, concluded. Final rosters — barring internal adjustments with minor league affiliates, or waiver wire acquisitions — are set.

The deadline is a revealing moment in the NHL season. It prescribes an honest self-examination by all 30 clubs. General Managers, scouts, and team personnel maneuver through a cascade of e-mails, faxes, phone calls, and conversations about who is available and how much they will cost. The worst teams must answer a very direct question: is it time to part ways with a top player — who will probably walk come July 1st — for prospects whose earning potential won't bust their salary cap? Look at recently successful squads like Buffalo, Pittsburgh, and, to an admittedly lesser degree, Washington, and there's a clear trend to assemble a roster internally.

Teams on the postseason bubble, conversely, operate amid more dire circumstances — choices routinely cost coaches and GMs their jobs. In the case of Atlanta, would Thrashers GM/coach Don Waddell dump winger Marian Hossa for a potentially comparable player, or retain him in slim hopes of making the playoffs? If Hossa remained, and Atlanta failed to advance, the Thrashers would have lost a remarkable player and received nothing. Obviously, the nuances of altering a dynamic are more severely pronounced when the fate of the team in question is unknown.

Last year's deadline was borderline lackluster, the loudest move made when the Nashville Predators swapped forward Scottie Upshall, defenseman Ryan Parent, and a first and third round pick for Peter Forsberg from the Philadelphia Flyers. But yesterday was filled with big-name movement, all in preparation for the final playoff stretch. Here we (subjectively) review some of the wisest deadline transactions.

(For those interested in the technicalities of trades, NHL.com kindly provides this short tutorial.)

Dallas Stars

Dallas ended Tuesday with a substantially deeper lineup than it started with by adding center Brad Richards and goalie Johan Holmqvist. In return, the 29th-ranked Tampa Bay Lightning received forwards Jussi Jokinen, Jeff Halpern, and goalie Mike Smith. Richards is an adaptable player who performs at even strength and on special teams, averaging over 24 minutes of ice time per game. Dallas got a Stanley Cup and Conn Smythe winning forward whose durability is surpassed only by his skills. Richards allows coach Dave Tippett to spread Mike Modano, Mike Ribeiro, Brendan Morrow, and Jere Lehtinen across multiple lines. They're now an immediate threat to Detroit whose defensive corps has (to put it lightly) taken a beating.

Meanwhile, Tampa has a chance to develop Smith as a number one goaltender. Holmqvist struggled since October, and GM Jay Feaster stressed that signing a goalie was his primary concern. But Holmqvist's experience will be vital should Dallas starter Marty Turco go down or need a break. Holmqvist may have tanked thus far, but he also wasn't playing in Dallas.

Colorado Avalanche

Is it 2008 or 2001? Not only did Colorado Avalanche GM Francois Giguere do the presumably unthinkable by signing Peter Forsberg days after announcing he would not return to the NHL this year, but he relinquished a mere draft pick to the Columbus Blue Jackets for veteran defensemen Adam Foote. A grinder with a proclivity for cheap shots, Foote was a staple of Colorado's last Cup winning team. Not the fleetest afoot, he brings a physical element to the blue line that will keep traffic away from Jose Theodore's face.

Giguere smoothly avoided jeopardizing Colorado's young talent. Foote's and Forsberg's experience will ground the Avalanche lineup. Combine the return of Joe Sakic and sniper Paul Stastny with the grittiness of Ryan Smythe and consistency of Milan Hejduk, and suddenly the Aves seem poised to scrap for a playoff spot in the Western Conference.

Philadelphia Flyers

What a year for the Fly guys. After an abysmal 2006-2007 season in which they finished dead last, they currently own the eighth playoff position in the Eastern Conference. But the past month has been unkind to the turn-around-team of the year. The Flyers dropped 10 in a row until a shootout victory over Buffalo on Monday (any Sabres fans still fuming at Briere's game winner?); they've been weakened by injuries (notably Simon Gagne, Mike Richards, and Joffrey Lupol), defensive lapses, and shoddy goaltending.

In response, GM Paul Holmgren traded Alex Picard — a 22-year-old defensemen who's played only 72 NHL games — and a conditional draft pick to Tampa for Vaclav "Vinnie" Prospal. (Philly drafted Prospal 71st overall in 1993.) Despite posting respectable numbers throughout his career, he's struggled to be consistent — a hindrance that may expose itself without Vincent Lecavalier and Martin St. Louis. Nonetheless, Prospal has a ring and more than a decade of experience. Although he doesn't personify offensive stability, Prospal can still play. And considering the injury ridden Flyers roster, a forward like Prospal that can play both center and wing will only strengthen his team's limp into the playoffs.

Washington Capitals

Did anyone see this coming? The Caps acquired Cristobal Huet, the Montreal Canadians' starting net minder for most of this season, for a paltry second round draft choice. Then they snagged Sergei Fedorov from Columbus for 2007 draftee Theo Ruth, a defenseman so unknown, not even Yahoo! Sports recognizes him.

(Here is where other writers would likely excoriate Montreal for getting so little in return for a number one goalie. Such lunacy speaks for itself. More importantly: Alexander Ovechkin, Alexander Semin, Viktor Kozlov, and now Fedorov. Is Washington the new Detroit?)

The Caps also traded Matt Pettinger to Vancouver for Matt Cooke. Cooke, a low-line winger with practically no points for the Canucks, will give Washington toughness and speed up front. As a result, the Caps lose an insignificant forward. Washington completed other minor deals, all helpful enhancements as the Caps challenge for the top spot in the Southeast Division.

San Jose Sharks

The Sharks are barely holding fifth in the West with 74 points. Eighth seeded Nashville is only two points behind; the West is that close. So, GM Doug Wilson scored the most coveted defensemen on the block: Brian Campbell. The Sharks gave Buffalo a first-round pick and mediocre forward Steve Bernier. Bernier has rotated among the bottom two lines for most of this season, not offering much productivity (13g, 10a).

Campbell, on the other hand, plays roughly 25 minutes per game, has a microscopic 12 penalty minutes, and went to his second All-Star Game last month. A fast, yet physical blue-liner, Campbell's ability to skate and quickly move the puck increased his value. The Sharks recognized their need for a reliable defenseman that could make swift breakout passes and anchor the point on the power play. Campbell's 43 points is second among Sharks scorers. And with 38 assists, he noticeably reduces Joe Thornton's playmaking burden.

Pittsburgh Penguins

The Penguins are second in the East with Sidney Crosby on the shelf. Evgeni Malkin, averaging almost two points per game in Sid's absence, is all but unstoppable. Ty Conklin has been solid in net, while Marc Andre Fluery was recalled from injury. Now they have Marian Hossa — the pervasive desire for whom was league-wide — and speedster Pascal Dupuis from Atlanta, plus Hal Gill from Toronto. In an immensely beneficial trade for the Pens, Atlanta received promising, albeit average forwards Colby Armstrong and Erik Christensen (replaceable role players). Christenson has been superb in the shootouts — success he's failed to employ during regulation. Armstrong, who was Crosby's roommate on the road and close friend, is a muckraker who will just as easily give a beating as take one. Sadly, their collective point totals hardly match Hossa's.

Hossa was highly discussed and his final whereabouts speculated for weeks. That the news came with under five minutes remaining until the deadline is curious, especially since Don Waddell publicized weeks ago that Hossa was going to be dealt. Pittsburgh is a growing complication for the East; and they just scared the shit out of the entire Atlantic Division.

See You Next Year

February was busy, indeed — 25 trades involving 45 players on the final day alone, big names and small, draft picks, and the hope of future success. Many teams modified their rosters for various reasons: to dump salaries, for draft picks, to make playoff runs. The Anaheim Ducks and New York Islanders each made a couple subtle changes. Those mentioned above were by no means the only ones, nor the most important. They were simply the transactions deemed the best for their organizations.

As fun as it is to tout theories and predictions of who will go where, the truth is that the push begins now. Both conferences have a tight race for its final postseason openings. Barely 20 games remain on each schedule. The trades that were hailed could quickly be scorned; those questioned eventually praised. There was enough inaction by teams that needed improvement to warrant a separate column. Regardless, the hype is over; all that's left to do is watch. And that's the best part about the trade deadline.

Posted by Jeff DiNunzio at 11:20 AM | Comments (1)

Golf's Version of Pros vs. Joes

It has been said that one of the many beauties of the game of golf is that the professionals play the same game as amateurs like you and I. We use the same equipment, can play many of the same courses, and can even play alongside of one another in the Open major championships. Everyone uses the same set of rules as governed by either the USGA or the Royal and Ancient. In other words, the difference — supposedly — between players on the professional tours and us Sunday hackers is, well, talent.

The problem, though, is that is not the reality of the game of golf today. With innovations in technology over the past 10 years, and particularly in the 1998-2002 time frame, the benefit that professionals see from the same clubs we all supposedly play is highly skewed to the professionals. According to the National Golf Foundation, the average golf score simply has not improved in that time frame. It is, at least in part, proof that the benefits of technology are not universally extended to amateurs.

Distance increases that have been seen by players on the professional tours — though leveled in the past two seasons — are still substantial and, on average, measure over 20 yards. In an effort to make the golf ball more resistant to the wind, the golf ball is more difficult to shape left and right, up and down. Still, the ball has an incredible spin rate out of the rough and allows for many more lies from off of the fairway to create green lights for players.

These significant benefits have resulted in a fundamental change in the professional tournament host course. Courses have been made dramatically longer by tournament organizers in an attempt to combat the skew to defenselessness that many lengthy players threaten to bring to tournament layouts. Many tournaments have inserted pin placements into the rotation that border on impossible. Rough has been grown to deep length in many tournaments — particularly the major tournaments, including the Masters' relatively deep "second cut."

In turn, the professional golfer has reacted to technology and these responses by playing a completely different style of golf as opposed to even 15 years ago. The style that professional golfers play today is much simpler. The goal of players — young and experienced alike — is simply to hit the ball as far and as straight as possible toward a selected target, and then repeat that task until they can putt the ball in the hole. In effect, the professional game has become simplified.

The days of strategy off the tee, working the ball in different ball flights and directions, and the general concept of shotmaking is on life support in the professional game. Some may argue that this simplification of the game at the professional level actually amounts to a change that reunifies the professional and amateur games. After all, most amateur golfers have very little control over their golf ball — much less the ability to customize their shot selection to the situation.

The difference, though, is that an amateur simply does not have the sophistication or know how to be able to delve into advanced shotmaking. It is certain, though, that almost any amateur would happily take the ability that the pros are not using to create shots. Professionals, on the other hand, are continually shunning their abilities to move the golf ball in favor of a style of play that simply tries to overpower a golf course when possible.

It is probable that many fans of professional game do not have a problem with the transition to a power game. In fact, I am sure that many fans do not even notice the change. Still, the purist desires to see a reversion back to the days when it was more difficult to hit the ball straight and the power game was not the usual — rather an extraordinary style. Many amateurs, though, would still like to be able to purchase the same types of technology that is available today. After all, amateurs will take any edge they can get in the hopes of improving their golf game, and the manufacturers of golf equipment will happily take their money.

When it comes to regulating the game, it seems that there is a conundrum. One option is that the governing bodies can choose to regulate technology for all golfers in an effort to not ruin technological advances for amateurs — which, in effect, is basically what the USGA's grooves proposal is. (That is serious editorializing there.) Or, the industry can decide that the days of denying the reality of bifurcation should end and that professionals should really have slightly different rules than those of the amateur golfer. Since I am convinced that the first option is not the correct answer to restoring strategy in golf, I think it is time to call for the official division of the rules for professionals and amateurs.

The problem to that suggestion is that it is basically impossible given the principles in charge of the game today. Tim Finchem, Commissioner of the PGA Tour, would not seriously entertain implementing rules and equipment standards that are specific to the PGA Tour. After all, Finchem's predecessor Deane Beman got into seriously hot water for taking a stand on professional-specific regulation. Finchem has also gone on record as saying that he feels it is not the responsibility of the PGA Tour to regulate golf equipment.

Further, even though the PGA Tour could decide to do something, it is not guaranteed that the other professional tours around the world would recognize those rules. In effect, a decision to bifurcate the game by the PGA Tour would actually create professional tours that respect the original rules of the game and trifurcate the sport. It would be a disaster.

It appears that the USGA and Royal and Ancient are not interested in bifurcating the game in the interest of returning shotmaking. Rather, through the USGA-sponsored grooves proposal, the governing bodies appear to be interested in bifurcating the game in the interest of preserving a specific aspect of the game — hitting the fairway. After all, USGA research on grooves was written toward the conclusion that there is little correlation between hitting the fairway and winning golf tournaments for professionals. The grooves proposal responds particularly to that fact. It does not, though, respond to the alterations in how far and straight that the golf ball flies. In effect, the USGA appears more interested in restoring hitting fairways and greens — the old U.S. Open mantra — as a key component to success in professional tournaments. That is their decision and they appear ready to stand by it, even if the manufacturing companies plan a huge lawsuit in response.

Unfortunately, my proposal is going to fall on deaf ears. Still, it is important to have the conversation about the future of the game with respect to the realities presented by golf technology. There are two games of golf now. I am not here to make a verdict on that situation, but it is the truth — a truth not uncommon to this sport.

What is left, then, is to question what is to be done about it. Is it to be embraced and rules are written to reflect that pros and amateurs need to be treated differently? Or is it to be denied and shunned in the interest of appealing to equipment manufacturers and allow the skill requirements of the pro game to continue devolving?

Posted by Ryan Ballengee at 11:11 AM | Comments (0)

February 26, 2008

The NBA, Where Anything Happens?

I'm not ashamed to admit it, but only four months into my first season of the NBA League Pass, I have become addicted. From the blatantly biased announcers every team has to the shameless local promotions that coincide with the local telecasts, I love it all. Especially the overdramatic "Where Amazing Happens" ad each team has.

In fact, I like the "Where Amazing Happens" idea so much that I decided to add a few of my own in, just to see what it would look like.

The NBA...

Where 50 Wins Gets You in Happens

It makes for a cute story, but realistically, I don't see a 50-win team missing the playoffs in the West. As of Tuesday, eight teams in the Western Conference are on pace to win at least 50 games. Denver, who right now would be the ninth seed, is on pace to win 48 games. It's hard to envision a scenario in which all eight teams maintain a 50-win pace and another team starts winning more often. It seems like the bar has been set out West: 50 wins gets you in.

Where Improving Happens

Congratulations to the Lakers for setting off a whirlwind of knee-jerk reactions after the Pau Gasol trade. You can argue until you're blue in the face that every team just made inevitable adjustments to their roster that most championship teams make. I'm not buying it.

Teams in the West saw that the Lakers and, on a much smaller scale, but equally as effective, the Utah Jazz made trades early on and said, "We are ready to win now." The rest of the league seemed to collectively accept that challenge and made moves of their own.

A few of those teams even succeeded in making their team better. They are, in no particular order:

Houston — I liked what the Rockets did at the deadline. They got rid of a locker room cancer (Bonzi Wells) and a bad contract (Mike James), and got back a serviceable backup point guard (Bobby Jackson) in return. If Houston fails to advance in the playoffs again this year, it'll be squarely on T-Mac and Yao.

San Antonio — The Spurs have been in this position too many times to get careless and try to make a splash just because the Lakers did. Instead, they made their patented bring-in-a-veteran-player-willing-to-take-a-lesser-role move twice and brought in Damon Stoudamire and Kurt Thomas.

P.S. While you were busy reflecting on the Shaq trade, the defending champs quietly moved to within a half-game of the top seed.

Where Not Improving Happens

Unlike those listed above, some teams did not improve at the deadline. They are, in no particular order:

Phoenix — Let me try and follow Steve Kerr's logic here. The Suns win a lot of games every year because they play fast and shoot well from outside. So this offseason, they bring in Grant Hill, who is neither fast nor a very good outside shooter. Then, as the season goes on, Kerr sees that he has the worst record within conference of any of the potential playoff teams (16-15) because everyone else has decided to play fast and shoot well, too.

So to counteract that, what does Steve Kerr do? He trades away speed and outside shooting for the slowest player in the league. Shaq in his prime is a terrible fit for this team. Shaq now is just mind-boggling. Be on the lookout for Seven Seconds or Less 2: Shaq Gets Into Position. I've mentioned in this space before that the Suns' style is too gimmicky to win, but now they don't even have an identity. Are they run-and-gun or pound the rock?

The trade was supposed to make the Suns better defensively, yet they give up more points with Shaq in the lineup (107 per game) than without (104). He is supposed to fit in offensively with what they do no problem, but they scored more without him (109 points per game) than they do with him (98.3 points per game). I know it's early and the rallying cry in the desert will be "adjustment period." You can hold off on judgment if you'd like until after the season, but I've seen enough. I've watched all three games Shaq has played with the Suns, and I can say with confidence that this Suns team will not win a playoff series.

Cleveland — Maybe the Cavs are hoping that LeBron doesn't realize that the trade was all smoke and mirrors. The Cavs did nothing but trade bad players with bad contracts for other bad players with bad contracts. Maybe the addition of Ben and Wally makes them slightly better, but they are still not better than the Celtics or Pistons, so the trade really doesn't accomplish much.

Delonte West will take some of the ball handling pressure off Lebron, but he's not nearly enough of an upgrade to make this team a threat in the East. Their strategy is the same as it was entering the playoffs last year: hope LeBron gets crazy hot.

Where Inmates Running the Asylum Happens

If the Taurean Green addition isn't the answer, the Nuggets are in big trouble. How can a team have two of the top five scorers in the league, the reigning two-time Defensive Player of the Year, and not be a playoff team? The answer is George Karl.

If you watch enough of the NBA League Pass, every announcer says pretty much the same two things about the Nuggets: they like to throw alley-oops and they like to play a zone. You could say anything else in the world about a team, but when you tell me those are two distinguishing traits of a team, I'll show you a team that isn't a contender.

It shows that the team has a tendency to be careless with the basketball, and that they can't guard anyone. That is a fatal combination come playoff time.

What does that have to do with George Karl? He's the one who lets these things happen. Normally, I'm not a fan of interviewing coaches during the game. But George Karl said something one time that pretty much summed up why Denver isn't a factor out West. The Nuggets were playing the Lakers on ESPN and the Nuggets trailed after the first quarter. They had turned the ball over too much trying to run and it in turn led to several fastbreak points for the Lakers. When asked what he planned to do differently in the second quarter, Karl replied that they were not going to make any changes because "this is how the guys like to play."

The head coach is afraid to make in game adjustments because his guys like playing a certain way. Something tells me that approach might not get it done come playoff time.

Where Conspiracy Theories Happen

Since I mentioned the Gasol trade already, I feel like I need to mention something that I find awfully coincidental. Last year, Jerry West was calling the shots in Memphis, and refused to trade Gasol to the Bulls in various packages that reportedly included several different quality, young players. West had made it known that he was stepping down after the season, and decided to let the next regime deal Gasol.

West then conveniently takes on an advisor role with the Lakers who just so happen to pull off the basketball equivalent of the Latanza Heist shortly thereafter. Now, either Mitch Kupchak somehow overcame all his shortcomings as a GM and pulled off this deal or Jerry West is in the background pulling all the strings on this one. My money is on the latter.

Where Amazing Happens

That's exactly what this season has been. For the first time in a long time, there is no real clear-cut favorite in either conference. The West is going to be a dogfight all the way to the finish and the East is a two-team race with a King-sized wild card in the deck. The NBA playoffs are the greatest two months in sports, and this year is shaping up to be among the best of the best.

Unfortunately, sentencing for the biggest black eye in league history will occur on April 18th, the same day the playoffs start, leaving us with a dark cloud hanging over the second season that reminds us:

The NBA ... Where Tim Donaghy Happened

Posted by Scott Shepherd at 11:35 AM | Comments (2)

Controversy-Free Football

It's hard to believe it's only been three weeks since the Super Bowl. The controversy over Bill Belichick's taping practices has covered the league like a thick fog, something out of a Stephen King book with the suit from Pennsylvania the dark monster lurking in the shadows.

It's gotten to the point Matt Walsh could produce tapes of Barack Obama in nothing but a turban snorting lines of cocaine off the Bible and it wouldn't get any more depressing.

But while the fog still looms, a funny thing has happened over the past week. The incredible over-analysis of the NFL combine, usually a subject for derision, provided a ray of sunshine, finally something normal. Free agency is just around the corner and it's beginning to feel a lot like football again.

Thank God.

So no more controversy for a while. Just rich guys getting richer, giving hope to the millions of us who just want to watch our teams play, the rest of it all be damned.

***

The large number of players receiving the franchise tag has made some classify this year's free-agency crop as weak. But though Terrell Suggs, Albert Haynesworth, Jared Allen, Nnamdi Asomugha, Ken Hamlin, Marcus Trufant, and Karlos Dansby won't be cashing in on the free market, that doesn't mean there aren't high-quality players available. Among those who will hit the market and should command some attention (unrestricted unless otherwise noted):

QB: Derek Anderson (Cleveland; restricted), Todd Collins (Washington), Quinn Gray (Jacksonville), Billy Volek (San Diego), Daunte Culpepper (Oakland), J.T. O'Sullivan (Detroit),

* In other words, it's draft, trade, or bust for teams looking for new QBs.

RB/FB: Michael Turner (San Diego), Marion Barber (Dallas; restricted), Julius Jones (Dallas), Justin Fargas (Oakland), Chris Brown (Tennessee), Mewelde Moore (Minnesota), Derrick Ward (NY Giants), Musa Smith (Baltimore), Jesse Chatman (Miami), Tony Richardson (Minnesota)

WR: Randy Moss, Donte Stallworth and Jabar Gaffney (New England), Bernard Berrian (Chicago), Patrick Crayton (Dallas), Devery Henderson (New Orleans), D.J. Hackett (Seattle), Jerry Porter (Oakland), Justin Gage (Tennessee)

TE: Eric Johnson (New Orleans), Marcus Pollard (Seattle), Ben Troupe (Tennessee), Jermaine Wiggins (Jacksonville), Bo Scaife (Tennessee; restricted), Ben Utecht (Indianapolis; restricted)

OL: OT Flozell Adams and G Larry Allen (Dallas), OT Kyle Turley (Kansas City), G Alan Faneca (Pittsburgh), G Jake Scott (Indianapolis), C Brett Romberg (St. Louis), C Jeff Faine (New Orleans)

DL: DE Justin Smith (Cincinnati), DE N.D. Kalu (Houston), DE Antwan Odom (Tennessee), DE Mike Rucker and DT Damione Lewis (Carolina), DT Tommy Kelly (Oakland), DTs Ian Scott and Kimo Von Oelhoffen (Philadelphia)

* The Giants' pressure in the Super Bowl is going to influence a lot of teams into loading up on the d-line, even if they don't really need starters there (Justin Tuck didn't start for the Giants, and he was arguable the best player on the field). As you can see from the list of players available this offseason, there's not a lot of depth in the defensive line market. More than any other position with the exception of quarterback, these are the guys teams work the hardest (and pay the most) to keep.

LB: Lance Briggs (Chicago), Boss Bailey (Detroit), Kawika Mitchell (New York Giants), Brandon Chillar (St. Louis), Clark Haggans (Pittsburgh), Calvin Pace (Arizona), Demorrio Williams (Atlanta), Mark Simoneau (New Orleans)

DB: Asante Samuel and Randall Gay (New England), Drayton Florence (San Diego), Gibril Wilson (New York Giants)

K: Josh Brown (Seattle), Rob Bironas (Tennessee; restricted)

To add to the free agents, you have the collection of players cut from their teams for one reason or another. Carolina released DeShaun Foster (releasing DeAngelo Williams from fantasy hell in the process) and Atlanta released Alge Crumpler.

A few of the other notable cuts over the past week or so: S Terrence Holt (Arizona), TE Bubba Franks (Green Bay), TE Jeb Putzier (Houston), S Dwight Smith (Minnesota), CB Fernando Bryant (Detroit), WR Muhsin Muhammad (Chicago), QB Byron Leftwich and OT Wayne Gandy (Atlanta), WR Marty Booker (Miami), G Mike Wahle (Carolina), and LB Warrick Holdman (Denver)

And then there are rumored cuts to come: Kansas City is expected to release CB Ty Law. Seattle is rumored to be considering cutting Shaun Alexander. And St. Louis is facing tough choices with Isaac Bruce and Leonard Little.

Little will count for $9.5 million against the cap next year with a $7 million roster bonus due at the end of this week. Bruce has already been cut once under Rams coach Scott Linehan and has a cap figure over $5 million. Little is 33 and coming off a debilitating toe injury. There's no way he's cashing a $7 million check this week.

And of course there's also the possibility of trades. Moss wouldn't have been on this list last year, being still under contract to the Raiders. Then they gave him away to the Pats for a fourth round pick in the draft. Already there's news the Vikings have agreed in principle to trade wide receiver Troy Williamson to Jacksonville for what is being reported as a sixth-rounder this year.

Who else might pack? Detroit WR Roy Williams has been making noise for months about wanting out with the Lions also fielding calls about talented-but-likes-strip-clubs-too-much-DT Shaun Rogers. Javon Walker is either getting traded or cut, but he won't be with Denver next season. If Roger Goodell re-instates Pacman Jones, the Titans will undoubtedly dump him as quickly as possible.

If Buffalo decides to commit to Trent Edwards, do they trade J.P. Losman? Does Tampa Bay try to get some value for Chris Simms? Will Miami continue to prove it has no soul by trading Jason Taylor? Will the Falcons trade DeAngelo Hall's talent for some peace and quiet? What about the rumored trade of Donovan McNabb to Chicago, Minnesota, or Baltimore?

(The guess is Losman, Taylor, and McNabb stay where they are, Simms and Hall find themselves elsewhere.)

And then of course there's the draft, one of my top five favorite sporting events of the year.

The Atlanta Falcons won the rights to pick third in the draft, "beating" Oakland in a coin flip. The Raiders will pick fourth on the strength of a tiebreaker over the Chiefs. What does this mean? That Boston College quarterback Matt Ryan is going to be playing in Atlanta next year. I've only barely begun to prep for the third annual Mock NFL Mock Draft Competition, but I do know this: Ryan to the Falcons is about as sure as Barack Obama saying the word "change" in his next speech.

Coming out of this past weekend's combine, I've got the Dolphins with Virginia DE Chris Long, the Rams with Michigan OT Jake Long, the Falcons with Ryan, the Raiders with LSU DT Glen Dorsey, and the Chiefs trading out to somebody who wants to jump ahead of the Jets for Arkansas RB Darren McFadden.

Then again, I could also see it going Chris Long, Dorsey, Ryan, McFadden, with the Chiefs keeping the pick for Jake Long. Or maybe Dorsey, Chris Long, Ryan, Jake Long, and McFadden to somebody other than the Chiefs.

Either way, it seems the top five is set with those guys. I think the Chiefs will keep the pick if Jake Long is on the board or trade it if he's not. If they do trade it and McFadden is on the board, bet on it being to the Cowboys, who really want McFadden and have two first-round picks (22 and 28) thanks to the trade with Cleveland that brought the Browns Brady Quinn last year.

If McFadden somehow makes it to six, the Jets will take him in a heartbeat. So since it doesn't seem likely the Dolphins, Rams, or Falcons will take him, it all comes down to the Raiders.

Oakland doesn't need McFadden. They were the sixth-best rushing team in the league last year. Whether it was LaMont Jordan, Justin Fargas, or Dominic Rhodes, they had a 100-yard rusher in eight of their 16 games. For a team that went 4-12, that's pretty impressive. In other words, McFadden would be a luxury pick for a team that can't afford to take a luxury pick.

What the Raiders do need to do is to improve their 31st-ranked rush defense. If Dorsey or Chris Long are on the board, they have to take them. If they're not, they'd be much better served trading down for someone desperate for Jake Long or McFadden. Then again, this is Al Davis we're talking about. Logic doesn't wear skull masks and shoulder pads with metal spikes.

Two other draft notes:

1. A lot of people are predicting the Pats to go with the best available corner at the seven slot, but I don't see it. It's far more likely they go USC DT Sedrick Ellis, Ohio State DE Vernon Gholston, or just trade out. The value at corner is much better toward the end of the first round and into the second.

2. Speaking of value, most of what is going to be written between now and April will be about the same group of 20-25 guys expected to go toward the top of the first round. But as everybody should know by now, it's the guys taken in the third round and later that can really push a team over the top.

As such, five guys who aren't getting the public love but have the skill to contribute next year: Arizona CB Antoine Cason (probably better as a free safety in the NFL), West Virginia RB Steve Slaton (mark it down — he's returning a punt for a TD next year), Louisville WR Harry Douglas (great, great hands), Arizona State C Mike Pollak, and Boston College CB DeJuan Tribble.

Five more guys who could become special teams contributors right out of the gate: Notre Dame S Tom Zbikowski, LSU FB Jacob Hester, Illinois LB J Leman, Arizona LB Spencer Larsen, and Appalachian State WR Dexter Jackson.

So while people in suits and muckrakers with keyboards continue to pound away at that thing with the thing, remember this: the NFL offseason is a season all its own. And it's about to kick into high gear.

Seth Doria is a writer based out of St. Louis. For the only daily column that mixes sports, politics, and entertainment news in one, visit The Left Calf.

Posted by Joshua Duffy at 11:19 AM | Comments (0)

February 25, 2008

Happy 25th, USFL! (Or What Could've Been)

Taking the sports page from the rung of news is a daily grand ritual. The sports world and all that goes with it creates a yearly agenda, aligning the major sports like football, basketball, baseball, and hockey so that when one major sport ends, another is in full flourish. When basketball and hockey end, baseball races take shape for its stretch run. When baseball pokishly cools, football rules.

Let's face it, the sports world flat-out reeks of insignificance every February. Cycling, motorsports, the spring training before spring training in baseball, the ego dances of NBA and NHL All-Star Weekends. Pro basketball's and hockey's "real season" doesn't begin until May, March Madness is still a month away, and football is as far away from us as it ever will be at this time of year — only a spring draft to mildly wet our beaks before September.

(...and not to mention the Sports pages are uprooted with sagacious bad news. I could read the other sections if I wanted to know about espionage or drug exploitations or court drama in the United States.)

Sports depression?

Wish there was more football on air? Not necessarily a farm league in Europe, or even one that has a 50-yard field and checking boards.

Why not a dose of real springtime football to fill this void?

Twas over two decades ago, a visionary named David Dixon thought the same thought on how to fill this sports void.

Twenty-five years ago this spring, the United States Football League kicked off its inaugural season. This the same year that brought us Michael Jackson's Thriller, a remote control for the Betamax, "National Lampoon's Vacation," parachute pants, and, of course, the USFL. Remember?

Anyone? ... Anyone? ... Bueller?

Young Steve Young of the Los Angeles Express? Heisman Herschel Walker of the New Jersey Generals (that's right ... New Jersey, not New York )? Reggie White of the Memphis Showboats? Jim Kelly of the Houston Gamblers?

Whether you recall the short life of the United States Football League or not doesn't mean you can't attend its 25th birthday party, or anniversary, or whatnot. Although the conception of the league was in 1982, the USFL kicked off in February 1983, 25 years ago to this very month.

Cities such as Orlando, Jacksonville, Birmingham, Memphis, Tulsa, San Antonio, and Portland, which had hopelessly sought franchises in the non-expanding National Football League, found refuge in the new rival league. Big cities already hosting the NFL in the fall/winter continued the gridiron spirit in bigger markets such as Oakland, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Denver, Tampa, Washington, and Philadelphia — even using the very same stadiums.

The USFL had all the green lights to making it, unlike the World Football League, the American Football League, and (cue to snicker aloud) ... the XFL. Upstart ESPN and big-wig ABC bought television rights for the first season. The NFL had gone through its first major strike in 1982. The timing was perfect for the new league. League founder David Dixon was in the right place, at the right time, with the right product and the right people behind it.

The USFL successfully courted three consecutive Heisman Trophy winners, and future stars were being drafted right out of the most prestigious colleges and being thrown into the league that introduced the two-point conversion into professional football and even, get this, an 18-game regular season schedule. Unlike the NFL, players could wear whatever jersey numbers they wished; hence Doug Flutie's No. 22 and Anthony Carter's No. 1, but were not liberated so far as to put "He Hate Me" on a jersey.

Even the teams' nicknames and uniforms were emblematic of the cities represented. The Arizona Wranglers. The Washington Federals. The Memphis Showboats. The Oklahoma Outlaws. The San Antonio Gunslingers. The Denver Gold. The Boston Breakers (a.k.a. New Orleans Breakers, a.k.a. Portland Breakers). The year was 1983 and the USFL was on!

In the USFL's first year, 1983, the average attendance for the 12 team league was 31,000 fans (about half the NFL average), and there was something metabolically strange about real football in the spring. You could watch a game on television and notice many empty seats in the background. Even the annual USFL Championship Game, which was held at a neutral site, couldn't pack the house. Seldom did you see empty seats at NFL games 25 years ago.

Also, players' contracts forbade them to two-time with the NFL franchises since the two leagues played at different times of the year. The second year of the league brought in six expansion franchises. Unknowingly, the USFL had reached its apex in 1984. The league whittled down to 14 teams in 1985. Financial losses by the millions were commonplace for nearly all the franchises during the second and third seasons.

Under the advocacy of Generals' owner Donald Trump, the USFL decided to go toe-to-toe with the NFL by announcing its move to the fall for the 1986 season, which went against founder Dixon's formula for league success. Teams such as the Breakers moved from New Orleans to Portland, frantically relocating and merging, and knowing it was a losing proposition to directly compete with the rival NFL in the fall. Whatever credibility the league had built was all but gone. The 1983 USFL champion Michigan Panthers merged with the Oakland Invaders because they simply could not compete with the NFL Lions, and the Oakland Invaders had the city to themselves with the relocation of the NFL Raiders to Los Angeles. Eddie DeBartolo's Pittsburgh Maulers simply didn't stand a chance with the beloved Steelers in the same stadium.

The USFL had hit nothing but yellow lights. The rogue owners had deviated from the original plan for the league, and they paid dearly for it. Before the USFL could ever say "hut, hut, hike" in the fall of 1986, the USFL and the NFL took to court over anti-trust issues, in which the USFL won a measly $1 from the NFL (perhaps alluding to the 1983 comedy "Trading Places" with Eddie Murphy and Dan Akroyd). The eight teams committed to stick it out in the fall of 1986 were informed of the league's canceled season. The USFL saw red. Game over.

While the concept of spring professional football was considered odd in the early 1980s, the USFL worked initially thanks to the quality of its product and the novelty of seeing pigskin fly during months when it never had before. Had the league continued down the path it was blazing, and had a few breaks gone the USFL's way, it likely would have survived to today.

Posted by Jon Gonzales at 11:06 AM | Comments (4)

February 22, 2008

The NFL Coaching Tree 2008 (Pt. 1)

Don't miss The NFL Coaching Tree 2008 (Pt. 2)

Three years ago, I wrote The NFL Coaching Tree, examining the roots of every head coach in the league. Since that piece was published, 18 of the NFL's 32 teams have changed head coaches, several of them more than once. In this column, I've updated the original article and taken the roots even deeper. When you read a coach's summary, you can now learn not only his immediate influences, but the less direct ones, as well.

The Bill Parcells Coaching Tree

Parcells, as the new Executive Vice President of Football Operations for the Miami Dolphins — and more importantly, the man at the root of Bill Belichick's coaching tree, has had a lot of influence on the NFL's head coaches.

Tom Coughlin, NYG — The head coach of this year's Super Bowl champ traces his roots to Parcells and the New York Giants. Coughlin was an assistant for Parcells in the late 1980s and early 1990s, including the team that won Super Bowl XXV. Parcells' influence remains clear in how Coughlin runs his team. Coughlin got his start in NFL coaching from Marion Campbell in Philadelphia, later spending two years under Forrest Gregg before working for Parcells.

Sean Payton, NO — The 2006-07 Coach of the Year, Payton's most immediate influence is Parcells, for whom he worked in Dallas. Payton also has roots with Jim Fassel and a connection to the mighty Bill Walsh/Mike Holmgren Tree through Ray Rhodes and Jon Gruden in Philadelphia.

Tony Sparano, MIA — The new head coach of the Dolphins, hand-picked by Parcells, spent five years as an assistant in Dallas while Parcells was the head coach there. It is not apparent that anyone else has had significant influence on his coaching philosophy.

The three coaches already assigned to the Parcells Tree are impressive enough — Coughlin is the reigning Super Bowl champ and Payton was the 2006 Coach of the Year — but we've yet to reach the Tuna's most impressive pupil. So successful has this coach been that he has his own, fairly large, branch on the Parcells Tree.

THE BILL BELICHICK BRANCH

Bill Belichick, NE — Where to begin? Spygate notwithstanding, Belichick has established himself as a surefire Hall of Famer, and probably one of the five or six best coaches of all-time. Although his father was a football coach, Belichick's primary influence is Parcells, for whom he spent over a decade as defensive coordinator. Like Parcells, he was an assistant to Ray Perkins in the early 1980s.

Romeo Crennel, CLE — Which coaching staff was the greatest ever? I don't think there's a clear answer to that question, but one of the leading candidates is the New York Giants in the 1981 and '82 seasons. Those teams were coached by Perkins, with Parcells, Belichick, and Crennel all on board as assistants. Crennel spent most of his career as an assistant for Parcells before joining Belichick's staff as defensive coordinator from 2001-04.

Eric Mangini, NYJ — These days, no love is lost between Mangini and Belichick, but it's clear whose tree — and in this case, whose branch — he belongs on. Belichick gave Mangini his start in the NFL, brought him to Parcells' staff from 1997-99, and hired him in New England when Belichick became head coach there in 2000. Mangini also spent one year working for Ted Marchibroda.

It is noteworthy that all three coaches on Belichick's branch also worked directly with Parcells at some point.

Rising Star: Josh McDaniels — As a new feature this year, I'm also profiling some of the league's most prominent assistants. McDaniels, who coordinated last year's record-setting offense in New England, is a very hot head coaching prospect. His foremost mentor is Belichick, but he got his start in coaching from Nick Saban at Michigan State. Notably, Saban is also part of the Belichick Branch; he spent four years on Belichick's staff in Cleveland.

Fired or Retired — Former Browns HC Chris Palmer was an offensive assistant for Parcells in New England and Dallas. He also worked for Coughlin in Jacksonville and is currently Coughlin's quarterbacks coach in New York. Former Chargers HC Kevin Gilbride traces his roots to Tom Coughlin, and former Dolphins HC Nick Saban was once an assistant to Belichick.

Bill Parcells Tree
[Click to expand]

The Tony Dungy Coaching Tree

Last season, Dungy's Tree was as hot as can be. The master was fresh off a Super Bowl victory, and his assistants were in high demand. That's only slightly less true in 2008.

Tony Dungy, IND — Dungy himself traces his coaching roots to Chuck Noll, Marty Schottenheimer, and Dennis Green — probably in that order. Dungy worked for Noll as both a player and a coach before joining Schottenheimer's staff in 1989. He was Green's defensive coordinator in Minnesota for four years before becoming head coach of the Buccaneers.

Rod Marinelli, DET — He spent 10 years in Tampa Bay working for either Dungy or Monte Kiffin, who has continued to run Dungy's defense in Tampa. Marinelli spent four of those years with Jon Gruden, and nine seasons as an assistant at the University of California, working under Joe Kapp and Bruce Snyder.

Lovie Smith, CHI — Dungy's most famous disciple, with the possible exception of Kiffin. After five seasons as Dungy's linebackers coach in Tampa, he spent three seasons as defensive coordinator for Mike Martz in St. Louis.

Mike Tomlin, PIT — Hired by Dungy in 2001, he spent another four years working under Gruden and Kiffin before one season as defensive coordinator in Minnesota.

Other Notables — Herman Edwards was Dungy's assistant head coach for five years.

Rising Star: Jim Caldwell — Dungy's successor-in-waiting is very much a product of Dungy himself, but he also spent seven years as an assistant to Joe Paterno at Penn State.

THE MONTE KIFFIN BRANCH

Lane Kiffin, OAK — This is actually kind of complicated: Tony Dungy to Monte Kiffin to Pete Carroll to Lane Kiffin. This isn't even an NFL-based tree, it's from USC, but it's the right answer. But Carroll himself owes his roots to the elder Kiffin (plus Bum Phillips, Jim Mora, Bruce Coslet, and George Seifert). The younger Kiffin also worked for Jeff Tedford at Cal.

Rising Star: Monte Kiffin — Okay, fine, I don't believe Monte Kiffin is really a "rising star" who is about to get a head coaching job. But he is without a doubt the most influential current NFL assistant never to be a head coach in the NFL. I believe Dungy is his primary influence, but Kiffin has also worked with Bud Grant, Tom Osborne, Lou Holtz, and of course, Jon Gruden. Kiffin's own tree includes connections to Edwards, Marinelli, Smith, Tomlin, Lane Kiffin, and USC head coach Pete Carroll.

Tony Dungy Tree
[Click to expand]

The Mike Holmgren Coaching Tree

Bill Walsh's Coaching Tree is legendary, but most of the people who worked directly for Walsh have retired by now. With the exception of a nod in Mike Shanahan's direction, Walsh's legacy effectively runs through Holmgren now.

Mike Holmgren, SEA — It doesn't get much easier than this: Holmgren's roots are with Walsh. He was an offensive assistant for San Francisco from 1986-91, serving under Walsh and George Seifert, before bringing Walsh's "West Coast" Offense to Green Bay and then Seattle.

Jon Gruden, TB — He spent three years as Holmgren's wide receiver coach before moving to Philadelphia as offensive coordinator for another Holmgren assistant, Ray Rhodes. Former Raiders coach Bill Callahan, if he were still around, would be on Gruden's branch.

Dick Jauron, BUF — Aside from three years as Holmgren's defensive backs coach in Green Bay, he also worked for Holmgren disciple Steve Mariucci. I nearly listed Jauron under the Bill Parcells Tree, though, because of his four years as Tom Coughlin's defensive coordinator in Jacksonville. Both Coughlin and Jauron worked for Forrest Gregg in the late 1980s.

Jim Zorn, WAS — Washington's new head coach spent the last seven seasons as Holmgren's quarterbacks coach. It's probably fair to say that Jack Patera, Zorn's first coach in the NFL, also deserves some credit.

THE ANDY REID BRANCH

Andy Reid, PHI — Worked with Holmgren at BYU in the 1980s and again at Green Bay through most of the 1990s before taking Holmgren's version of the West Coast Offense to Philadelphia.

Brad Childress, MIN — Reid's offensive coordinator in Philadelphia, he was also part of the legendary Northern Arizona coaching staff that included Childress, Reid, Bill Callahan, and Marty Mornhinweg. He also has spent eight years at Wisconsin as an assistant for Badgers coach Barry Alvarez.

John Harbaugh, BAL — It's more than a little counter-intuitive, but the most dynamic wing of the Walsh Tree seems to run through Andy Reid at this point. Harbaugh spent nine years as an assistant to Reid. He also has roots with the University of Cincinnati, under head coaches Tim Murphy and Rick Minter.

Rising Star: Steve Spagnuolo — The sought-after defensive coordinator for the New York Giants, Spagnuolu spent eight years working for Reid with the Eagles.

Fired or Retired — Former Eagles and Packers HC Ray Rhodes, 49ers and Lions HC Steve Mariucci, Packers HC Mike Sherman, and Lions HC Marty Mornhinweg were all Holmgren disciples. Mornhinweg is Reid's top offensive assistant in Philadelphia. Former Raiders HC Bill Callahan is also in this tree via Jon Gruden, for whom he worked in Philadelphia and Oakland.

Mike Holmgren Tree
[Click to expand]

The Marty Schottenheimer Coaching Tree

In my original article three years ago, I named Schottenheimer's Coaching Tree the largest and most impressive in the NFL. It's lost that designation now, because I gave Bill Cowher and Tony Dungy their own trees. I think they've earned them, but both coaches were heavily influenced by Schottenheimer.

Herm Edwards, KC — Spent the early 1990s in Kansas City with Schottenheimer before following Dungy to Tampa Bay. Edwards also has roots with Dick Vermeil, who was his coach during Edwards' playing career with the Eagles.

Mike McCarthy, GB — Served as an assistant to Schottenheimer for six years before joining Jim Haslett's staff in New Orleans as a coordinator. I think Marty — and his top offensive assistant, Al Saunders — had the bigger influence.

Other Notables — Dallas HC Wade Phillips was Schottenheimer's defensive coordinator in San Diego.

Fired or Retired — Former Chiefs HC Gunther Cunningham was Schottenheimer's defensive coordinator in Kansas City. He now holds the same position on Edwards' staff.

The Bill Cowher Coaching Tree

Many of Cowher's assistants have gotten head coaching gigs, but most of those have been short and unsuccessful. Cowher played and coached for Marty Schottenheimer in Cleveland, and he was also on Schottenheimer's staff in Kansas City.

Ken Whisenhunt, ARI — Six years under Cowher make putting him on this branch a no-brainer, but Whisenhunt also worked for Ted Marchibroda, and he played for Joe Gibbs.

Fired or Retired — Former Bengals HC Dick LeBeau, Bills HC Mike Mularkey, Cowboys HC Chan Gailey, Panthers and Texans HC Dom Capers, and Saints HC Jim Haslett all worked for Cowher.

Rising Star: Russ Grimm — How he didn't get hired for Washington's coaching vacancy is still beyond me, but Grimm, Whisenhunt's assistant head coach in Arizona, remains a top candidate. He spent six years on Cowher's staff, but Grimm also has significant connections to Gibbs (who coached Grimm throughout an 11-year playing career) and Norv Turner (for whom Grimm spent seven seasons as an assistant).

THE MARVIN LEWIS BRANCH

Marvin Lewis, CIN — He was Cowher's linebackers coach in Pittsburgh, working with the likes of Kevin Greene, Levon Kirkland, and Greg Lloyd. Lewis also has some ties to Ted Marchibroda and Brian Billick, his superiors in Baltimore.

Jack Del Río, JAC — He worked under Lewis on the Ravens' defensive staff. Del Río got his coaching start from Mike Ditka in New Orleans, but was probably more influenced by coaches for whom he played: Jim Mora, Jimmy Johnson, and Dennis Green.

Mike Smith, ATL — At what point does a branch get so small, or at least so far removed from the original tree, that we call it a leaf? Smith was Del Río's defensive coordinator in Jacksonville. For those of you playing along at home, here's how we got from Cowher to Smith: Mike Smith coached for Jack Del Río, who coached for Marvin Lewis, who coached for Bill Cowher. Atlanta's new head coach also spent a lot of time with Jim Ragland at Tennessee Tech.

Marty Schottenheimer Tree
[Click to expand]

Smaller Trees

That's it. I'm out of the major trees. But you can trace 24 of the NFL's current head coaches to one of the major trees we've already examined: Bill Parcells, Tony Dungy, Mike Holmgren, Marty Schottenheimer, and Bill Cowher.

THE BUDDY RYAN COACHING TREE

Jeff Fisher, TEN — He played for Ryan (and Mike Ditka) in Chicago, and he was on Ryan's staff in Philadelphia. He also worked for George Seifert in San Francisco, and in college he was coached by John Robinson and Norv Turner.

Rising Star: Rex Ryan — I'll assume I don't need to explain why he would be part of his father's coaching tree, but Baltimore's defensive coordinator also has roots with Marvin Lewis and Brian Billick.

Rising Star: Jim Schwartz— Tennessee's defensive coordinator was interviewed for several head coaching vacancies this January. His main influence is Fisher, but he also coached for Ted Marchibroda in Baltimore and Bill Belichick in Cleveland.

Fired or Retired — Former Cardinals HC Dave McGinnis was a defensive assistant for the Bears in the 1980s and '90s, and is now Fisher's assistant head coach in Tennessee. Former Bills HC and new Jacksonville defensive coordinator Gregg Williams was also a Fisher assistant.

THE GEORGE SEIFERT COACHING TREE

Mike Shanahan, DEN — He's first and foremost a member of the Bill Walsh Coaching Tree, via three seasons with Seifert, but he also has strong ties with Dan Reeves, and some connection to both Barry Switzer, with whom he worked at Oklahoma, and Charley Pell, who coached the Florida Gators. Shanahan does not share Pell's and Switzer's reputations for NCAA rule-breaking.

Gary Kubiak, HOU — He spent 11 seasons as an assistant to Shanahan, and one year as Seifert's quarterbacks coach. Like Shanahan, Kubiak has connections to both Seifert and Dan Reeves, the latter having coached Kubiak during his playing career in Denver.

Other Notables — Jeff Fisher and Mike Holmgren were both assistants for Seifert in the early 1990s.

Other Coaches

John Fox, CAR — His first NFL coaching job was for Chuck Noll in Pittsburgh, so I'm putting him with Dungy on the Chuck Noll Coaching Tree. Fox also worked with Jim Fassel and Art Shell.

Scott Linehan, STL — I desperately tried not to do this, but there's no way around it. Linehan is part of the Dennis Green Coaching Tree, and he's on the Mike Tice Branch. Linehan is also connected to Dennis Erickson, Jim Lambright,and John L. Smith, via college playing and coaching ties.

Mike Nolan, SF — I hate to keep assigning coaches to their father's trees, but I don't see any way around planting a Dick Nolan Coaching Tree, so Mike can be on it. This guy has been everywhere, but most notably, he has roots with Dan Reeves and Norv Turner.

Wade Phillips, DAL — Where to put this guy? Phillips was an assistant to Buddy Ryan in Philadelphia. He spent three seasons as Marty Schottenheimer's defensive coordinator in San Diego. He worked for Marv Levy in Buffalo and was promoted to succeed him when Levy retired. Phillips was also a defensive coordinator for Dan Reeves in both Denver and Atlanta. Ultimately, I went in another direction, and I put Phillips on the tree of the man who gave him his first NFL coaching job: Bum Phillips. Wade worked for his dad in both Houston and New Orleans before moving to Denver as an assistant with Reeves.

Norv Turner, SD — The lone remaining head coach who runs the original "West Coast Offense" developed by Sid Gillman and Don Coryell, Turner is part of that esteemed coaching tree through John Robinson and Ernie Zampese. Turner was an assistant to Robinson for seven years at USC and another six with the Los Angeles Rams. More famously, Turner was Jimmy Johnson's offensive coordinator in Dallas from 1991-93.

Rising Star: Jason Garrett — The hotshot offensive coordinator in Dallas, if he becomes a head coach next year, will probably do so as part of the Jim Fassel Coaching Tree. He also has connections to Nick Saban and Barry Switzer.

Rising Star: Jim Mora, Jr. — Yes, he's part of the Jim Mora, Sr. Tree. Little Mora also has connections to Steve Mariucci (Holmgren Tree), Al Saunders, and Don Coryell. He is expected to take over for Mike Holmgren in Seattle, probably at the end of the 2008 season.

Summary

Every major coaching tree in list format. Secondary and indirect connections are italicized. Note that some coaches may appear on more than one list, and "rising stars" are not listed.

The Bill Parcells Coaching Tree — Bill Belichick, Tom Coughlin, Sean Payton, Tony Sparano, Romeo Crennel, Eric Mangini, Dick Jauron

Gone, but not forgotten: Al Groh, Ray Handley, Chris Palmer, Nick Saban

The Tony Dungy Coaching Tree — Tony Dungy, Rod Marinelli, Lovie Smith, Mike Tomlin, Herman Edwards, Lane Kiffin

The Mike Holmgren Coaching Tree — Mike Holmgren, Jon Gruden, Dick Jauron, Andy Reid, Jim Zorn, Brad Childress, John Harbaugh, Mike McCarthy

Gone, but not forgotten: Steve Mariucci, Marty Mornhinweg, Ray Rhodes, Mike Sherman, Bill Callahan

The Marty Schottenheimer Coaching Tree — Herman Edwards, Mike McCarthy, Wade Phillips, everyone on the Bill Cowher and Tony Dungy Trees

Gone, but not forgotten: Cowher, Gunther Cunningham, Cam Cameron

The Bill Cowher Coaching Tree — Marvin Lewis, Ken Whisenhunt, Jack Del Río, Mike Smith, Mike McCarthy

Gone, but not forgotten: Dom Capers, Chan Gailey, Jim Haslett, Dick LeBeau, Mike Mularkey

Those are the big five. Smaller ones are listed below:

The Buddy Ryan Coaching Tree — Jeff Fisher

Gone, but not forgotten: Dave McGinnis, Gregg Williams

The George Seifert Coaching Tree — Mike Shanahan, Jeff Fisher, Mike Holmgren, Gary Kubiak

Gone, but not forgotten: Ray Rhodes

The Jim Fassel Coaching TreeJohn Fox, Sean Payton

The Jimmy Johnson Coaching TreeJack Del Río, everyone on Norv Turner's tree

Gone, but not forgotten: Dave Campo, Butch Davis, Dave Wannstedt

The Ted Marchibroda Coaching TreeMarvin Lewis, Ken Whisenhunt, Eric Mangini

The Jim Mora Coaching TreeJack Del Río

Gone, but not forgotten: Dom Capers, Jim Haslett, Jim Mora, Jr.

The Chuck Noll Coaching Tree — Tony Dungy, John Fox

The Dan Reeves Coaching TreeGary Kubiak, Mike Nolan, Wade Phillips, Mike Shanahan

The Norv Turner Coaching TreeMike Nolan

Gone, but not forgotten: Cam Cameron, Mike Martz

All diagrams and illustrations of coaching trees that accompany this study were created by Brad Oremland and Lisa Fuller.

Part two of "The NFL Coaching Tree 2008" will be available Friday, Feb. 29 and looks at the Coaching Forests; Brad reveals how most of the league's head coaches can trace their roots to one of four basic places.

Posted by Brad Oremland at 11:49 AM | Comments (11)

February 21, 2008

Five Steps to Fix the NFL's Worst

I'm sitting here thinking about what to write, and it occurs to me that I'm an incredibly lucky guy.

Two healthy, beautiful daughters, a wife that to my knowledge hasn't decided to leave me yet, and a chair within viewing distance of a TV.

All things considered, I'm a pretty lucky guy.

So tonight, I've decided to give a little something back.

I'm going to use my vast football knowledge to give the worst teams in the NFL a foolproof plan to get back to respectability.

No need to thank me.

Miami Dolphins

Step 1) Call Jerry Jones, offer him the first overall pick in the draft for Marion Barber and his two first rounders. If he doesn't accept, sweeten the deal by adding a third rounder. Jerry Jones will make the deal.

Step 2) Grab Aqib Talib with the 22nd pick in the draft. Aqib gives you a big, athletic cornerback who has the size and speed to keep up with the Randy Moss's of the world.

Step 3) Next, you need to get your young quarterback some weapons. Grab Limas Sweed with the other first-rounder you get from the Cowboys.

Step 4) Trade Jason Taylor for whatever you can get. Jason Taylor is old, has a little value, and will not be around long enough to see you turn this thing around. So trade him for whatever you can get.

Step 5) Use the rest of your draft picks on linemen, both offensive and defensive, unless Dan Connor or Keith Rivers falls into the second round. If one does, grab him. If one falls close to the end of the first round, trade up to get there.

St. Louis Rams

Step 1) Get yourself either Glenn Dorsey or Chris Long, whichever guy is still on the board at two.

Step 2) Chris Williams from Vanderbilt is probably going to fall into the second round. You pick second in the second round. It's a perfect marriage! Williams will give you a future replacement for Orlando Pace and an instant infusion of talent at the offensive line (either inside or at right tackle).

Step 3) Invest in anti-concussion technology to help save your quarterback. Marc Bulger spends more time on his back than a female Raiders fan (yes, I went there). Since you can't seem to stop him from getting hit, invest in technology that will help keep him coherent when he does get hit.

Step 4) Tape Steven Jackson's mouth shut. He's not the best running back in the NFL. He's not going to rush for 2,000 yards next season. Best to keep him from embarrassing himself again by proclaiming both those things to anyone who will listen.

Step 5) Sue the Patriots! Help take your fans' minds off the fact that you stink again by suing the New England Patriots for potentially videotaping your walkthrough before Super Bowl XXXVI.

Oakland Raiders

Step 1) Stop the whole "Weekend at Bernie's" thing and just let Al Davis die. We've seen him. We know he's not a living person. He looks like a Skeletor, except more bony and dead-looking.

Step 2) Stop trying to run your coach out of town. Lane Kiffin is the only good thing you've got going. Stop trying to get him to quit and fire yourself. You suck.

Step 3) Tell your fans to stop wearing Halloween costumes, unless it's actually Halloween. I can't stress this enough. You look like morons. Your kids are ashamed of you. Stop it. Just stop it.

Step 4) Get someone competent to run your draft. Then, when they draft someone, make sure you sign him before the month of September. Sounds simple, sure. But we know how that goes.

Step 5) Just win, baby.

SeanMC is a columnist for Bleacher Report and writes a column for Sports Central every other Thursday. You can read more articles by SeanMC in his Bleacher Report archive.

Posted by Sean Crowe at 11:09 AM | Comments (1)

NASCAR Top 10 Power Rankings: Week 1

Note: the quotes in this article are fictional.

1. Ryan Newman — Newman, buoyed by help from teammate Kurt Bush, rocketed past Tony Stewart on the final lap, securing car owner Roger Penske's first Daytona 500 win. Newman credited Busch for his help, and called Busch's assist a "push from God."

"Yeah, you heard right," says Newman. "The No. 2 Miller Lite Dodge is the holy vessel of God's will. They say the Lord works in mysterious ways. I'd definitely classify 'through Kurt Busch' as mysterious, not to mention pretty darn scary. I haven't seen this kind of an assist from Penske teammates since I packed Rusty Wallace's bags for him in 15 minutes. Kurt and I work pretty well as teammates. Throw in divine intervention, and you've got an unbeatable combination, even when Tony Stewart teams up with his pal Satan, who's known for his hellacious pit strategy."

2. Tony Stewart — It was evident that the Joe Gibbs Toyotas weren't lacking for power in their debut at Daytona, as Stewart and teammates Kyle Busch and Denny Hamlin led 134 of the 200 laps. As possibly the greatest driver never to have won the 500, Stewart carried the burden of his own lofty expectations, as well as the weight of an extra chin, into the lead with one lap remaining. But circumstances and the lack of a push from behind cost Stewart, and he was passed by Ryan Newman, wisely paired up with teammate Kurt Busch, for the win.

"I guess there's one Penske driver who can beat me to the punch," says Stewart, who's beginning to look a lot like an overweight version of New York cop Frank Serpico. "But I couldn't be more happier with the Toyota power plant. I can't wait to thank those Japanese engineers in person. To the Japanese people, I'm like Godzilla. They revere me, but they're scared to death of me. Just like NASCAR photographers. That will also give me the opportunity to introduce my new product, 'Smoke' brand wasabi sauce, guaranteed to blister the tongue like a used tire at Daytona."

3. Kyle Busch — Busch clearly had the strongest car, leading a race-high 86 laps, but as he and Stewart split race leader Jeff Burton on the restart with four laps to go, Busch went below the yellow line. He immediately gave the position back so as not to suffer a black flag, and that left him too far back to make his own run for the win, let alone help Stewart against the Penske duo.

"Sure, I wish I could have won the race," says Busch. "But I can't be disappointed with a fourth to go along with seconds in both the Craftsman Truck series and the Nationwide series. It doesn't matter what make of car I drive or for which iconic car owner I drive, I get results, often in more immediate fashion than the Guantanamo Bay Waterboarding Team. But, as a teammate of Tony Stewart, my brother Kurt's most hated rival, I'm faced with an awkward situation. Whose side do I choose? It's a difficult situation in which to be. After much deliberation, I've chosen to go with Tony. Not because he's my teammate; I hate my brother, too."

4. Kurt Busch — Busch rallied from a starting position of 43rd, and a previous punch from nemesis Tony Stewart and drove into position to follow teammate Ryan Newman across the line for a 1-2 Roger Penske finish. On February 8th, during a practice for the Budweiser Shootout, Busch and Stewart's annual altercation led to Busch ramming Stewart's No. 20 Toyota on the track, and Stewart slugging Busch in their meeting with NASCAR officials.

"I guess it's pretty stupid to get so upset about a crash in practice," says Busch. "I mean, it's practice. We're talking 'bout practice? Practice? Practice? Even Allen Iverson would say that's dumb. Anyway, we made history. Newman became the first Penske driver to win the Daytona 500, and I became the first driver from any team to be slugged both by Jimmie Spencer and Tony Stewart."

5. Dale Earnhardt, Jr. — Earnhardt's ninth-place finish set the pace for the Hendrick Motorsports stable, and while his result in his Hendrick debut should not be considered a disappointment, it certainly could have been better. Earnhardt stayed out after a late caution while all of the leaders pitted, then, a radio malfunction led to a missed signal to pit 20 laps from the end. Furthermore, Earnhardt's rabid fans were faced with the stunning realization that Amp energy drink does not contain alcohol.

"But it makes a great mixer," says Earnhardt. "And it gives you the strength to turn back the charges of any random attacks from 800-pound gorillas you may face during your daily routine. If you believe that, then you're probably enjoying a drink of Amp'd right now while dressed head-to-toe in No. 88 gear. I've got a name for my fans who've switched over and bought my new merchandise — the 'Crazy 8s.' Those that are still wearing my old gear; well, you all are the 'Lazy 8s.' Let's face it. My merchandise sales drive this nation's economy. So, if you don't spend your government rebate check on No. 88 merchandise, then you're un-American, and probably a fan of open-wheel racing."

6. Jimmie Johnson — Johnson's quest to become only the second driver to win three-straight Cup titles began with a lackluster 27th at Daytona. The No. 48 Chevrolet came off the jack in an early pit stop, then Johnson was spun in a brush with rookie and former open-wheel champ Sam Hornish, Jr. Johnson will resume his quest to match Yarborough's feat from well down the points standings. However, a 39th in last year's 500 didn't stop him from capturing his second consecutive title.

"My chase for number three is off to a slow start," says Johnson. "But the race to duplicate Yarborough's feat is well underway. In fact, just the other day, I whipped the tails of two brothers named 'Allison.' It wasn't Bobby and Donnie, though. It was Joey and Billy, 8- and 10-year-old brothers who just wouldn't stop badgering me for an autograph. Look kids, if you want me to sign a helmet, just don't throw it at me.

"As for Hornish, there are reasons these open-wheeled drivers are here in NASCAR. One, they give people like me someone to blame in cases in which I wreck them, as in Sunday's race. And, they give us ample opportunities to gaze upon Ashley Judd, wife of Dario Franchitti. I hear Ashley's sister, Wynona, or as she's known in the Pacific Northwest, Sasquatch, is single and looking for a driver. Elliot Sadler would make a perfect match."

7. Kasey Kahne — For the second consecutive year, Kahne earned a seventh-place finish at Daytona, only this time he did it under the Budweiser banner. Kahne finished two spots ahead of the former driver of the Bud car, Dale Earnhardt, Jr., a situation that did not sit well with Earnhardt fans, leaving them in the awkward situation of tossing Budweiser cans at the Budweiser car.

"I've gone from starring in ads aimed at undersexed, middle-aged housewives," says Kahne, "to promoting a product to oversexed, middle-aged men. So, in essence, I went from being a wife's favorite driver to being her husband's favorite. But, there's no truth to the rumor that I've changed my name to Kasey Kahne, Jr. and I've started speaking with a North Carolina accent."

8. Jeff Gordon — What looked like a promising day for Gordon turned sour when a suspension failure on lap 153 extinguish his chances for a fourth Daytona 500 win. He completed 186 laps and finished 39th.

"At least it wasn't a catastrophic suspension failure," says Gordon. "A truly 'catastrophic suspension failure' is when the velcro straps on my little girl's diaper break. But at least I kept the car off the wall, which is more than I can say for Casey Mears. That dude's seen more walls than Pink Floyd."

9. Clint Bowyer — Bowyer was in the lead on lap 184 when he was clipped and sent spinning by the No. 42 car of Juan Pablo Montoya, father of South American teeny-bop sensation Hannah Montoya. The spin flat-spotted all four of the tires on Bowyer's Jack Daniels Chevy, and after leaving the pits, he came home in 24th.

"As a native of Bogota, Colombia," says Bowyer, "you'd think Montoya would be able to hold a line. He should have been content just to tuck in comfortably behind me. Ask any fan. I guarantee you they would have been thrilled to see 'Jack and Coke' atop the Daytona leaderboard."

10. Reed Sorenson — Sorenson was fast for the duration of Daytona's Speed Weeks, finishing second to Dale Earnhardt, Jr. in the first of the Gatorade Duels, and powering to a fifth in the Daytona 500. Sorenson also led five laps in the 500, and placed his name amongst the ranks of a star-studded top 10.

"I'm sure some people may think I felt out of place up there with the big dogs," says Sorenson. "Maybe I was a little bit out of my element, but compared to Chubby Checker and Kool and the Gang on the Daytona infield, I felt right at home. That was the most un-NASCAR-like moment since last year's pre-race concert. You should have seen the bewildered expression on Junior Johnson's face. Of course, Junior's always got that bewildered expression on his face."

Predicted Auto Club 500 winner: Jeff Burton

Posted by Jeffrey Boswell at 11:08 AM | Comments (2)

February 20, 2008

Top 10 Fantasy Baseball '08 Bargains

John Maine (RHP, New York Mets)

Johan Santana grabs the headlines, but you'll pay high for his services on draft day. Behind him, John Maine is the only reliable and/or healthy starter on the Mets' roster. Maine will add wins with the high-powered Mets offense behind him and his strikeout rate will hover around a healthy 8 Ks per 9 IP. He needs to cut the walks down and he's prone to the long ball (23 last season), but at 27 (in May), he has time on his side.

His fastball tops out at around 94 mph, but it has good movement and he sneaks up on batters, especially high. He can hit the edges and doesn't get flustered on the mound when things are not going to plan. As late as July 29th, he was sporting an ERA of 2.92, but hit the wall in August and September, understandably as it was his first season starting.

Maine comes with one big warning: his innings count jumped from 90 in 2006 to 191 in 2007 and this usually signifies a red alert. Maine reported arm numbness in August, but pitched 7.2 innings of 1-hit ball in his last start against Florida. He seems durable and is worth taking a chance on in the mid-late rounds of 12-team mixed leagues. I can see 15 wins, 170Ks, and an ERA around 3.60.

Michael Cuddyer (1B/OF, Minnesota Twins)

Cuddyer was one of last season's hot picks to have a big year, but he floundered through 144 games with a variety of niggling injuries and returned mediocre numbers (87-16-81-.276). He's capable of replicating or beating his 2006 numbers of 102-24-109-.284 with a healthy season and could be a mid-round bargain with drafters recalling last season's flop.

Yahoo! Sports fantasy baseball experts composite rankings have Cuddyer behind Jay Bruce, Rick Ankiel, Jacoby Ellsbury, Matt Kemp, Jeremy Hermida, and Johnny Damon, quite ludicrous considering that five of the above are virtually straight out of AAA ball and unproven and the other (Damon) is always injured and slated to platoon at DH with Jason Giambi or CF with Melky Cabrera.

Cuddyer is at the crossroads of his career and needs a big season to earn a decent paycheck and start to justify some of that first-round selection hype. With Joe Mauer, Justin Morneau, and Delmon Young surrounding him in the lineup, the Twins aren't exactly anemic, so numbers around 100-25-110-.285 aren't impossible.

James Shields (RHP, Tampa Bay Devil Rays)

26-year-old Shields doesn't get a lot of fantasy love being hidden away amongst the disinterested snowbirds of South Florida. He wasn't a highly-touted prospect, drafted in the 16th round in 2000, and he didn't tear up the minor leagues, but he ended last season in spectacular fashion. His last five starts returned a 2.29 ERA, 3 wins, 30Ks, and almost 8 innings per start.

Shields pitches in the AL East, where dangerous bats lurk in every corner, but he's a solid late-round option to fill out the pitching staff on draft day. Scott Kazmir has gaudier numbers and a stronger arm, but he'll go 8 rounds or so before Shields. He did see a jump in his innings pitched last year (124.2 in 2006 up to 215), so there is a cautionary note.

He could struggle to hit 15 wins, though the Rays figure to be better this season (don't they always figure that?), but he should be a steady pitcher who won't ruin your rotation, returning similar numbers to Maine with less wins.

Dustin McGowan (RHP, Toronto Blue Jays)

McGowan is another young (26 by opening day) pitcher in the brutal AL East. He's been brought along slower than Shields as the Jays can afford to be gentle with their stronger pitching staff, but he's got a decent arm and will add around 7-8 Ks per 9 IP. He needs to watch the walks (3.23 per 9 IP in 2007) and trust his strong arm more rather than nibbling at the edges. The promising post-ASB numbers (3.67 ERA, 1.14 WHIP, 2.17 BAA) will boost his confidence heading into his first full season in the rotation.

Personally, I'm not keen on using top-100 picks on pitchers, bar Jake Peavy and Santana, so it's guys like Shields, Maine, and McGowan in later rounds that are crucial to draft day success. None of them stand out as "aces," but combined with a strong RP core on your team, they can keep the team ERA down and keep you in contention for pitching points.

Brian Wilson (RHP, San Francisco Giants)

Closers, I hate them. You use a high-round pick on them (B.J. Ryan) and they get injured. You panic and make a trade (as I did last season after losing Ryan) for Brian Fuentes and within two weeks, he blows 4 saves and loses the job. The whole closing situation is fraught with danger once you get past Joe Nathan, J.J. Putz, and Jonathan Papelbon.

So one policy is to forget them until the latter rounds and take a flier on those currently in the second or even third chair. The waiver wire always throws up a bunch of emergency closers anyway.

One such flier is Brian Wilson, who is currently in the background behind former first-round pick Brad Hennessey. Wilson nailed down 6 of his 7 save opportunities last season when he got the call in the ninth after Hennessey lost the job. Take out his September 25th meltdown against San Diego and he actually only gave up 6 runs in 22-plus innings and 3 hits in his 6 saves.

Hennessey has the chair right now, but he's lost the job before and doesn't have the type of lights-out stuff managers like in a closer. It wouldn't be a stretch to imagine the job changing hands in spring training or early April. The competition is Steve Kline, Randy Messenger, and Vinnie Chulk, none of which have the look of a reliable ninth-inning guy. It's not hard to see Wilson beating out this motley crew and getting the curly finger from Bruce Bochy.

A note of caution, the Giants are a very poor hitting team and save opportunities are likely to be scarce. But if he's there in the final rounds, snag him and stash him; it could pay dividends.

Carlos Ruiz, (C, Philadelphia Phillies)

Catchers, don't you just hate them more than closers? They take more days off than Paris Hilton, get an RBI once a week, and end up on the DL before August after a fight with one of their own pitchers.

Basically, there are only five catchers worth owing: Victor Martinez, Russell Martin, Brian McCann, Joe Mauer, and Jorge Posada. The rest are a potential black hole of non-production.

Owning Martinez or Martin will cost you a second- or third-round pick and that's a high premium to pay for what they offer in terms of production. So is there anyone down in the low rounds that won't hurt you in the standings?

The Tampa Bay backstop Dioner Navarro might have some improvement in him and if he can healthy for a season, the Pirates' Ryan Doumit has power potential, but the one I like is Carlos Ruiz in Philadelphia. His home stadium will give him a power boost, he's young, and disciplined at the plate. He won't return a David Ross type BA and might knock a few in, even batting eighth in the order.

Something around 60-15-65-.280 is possible, which isn't bad considering catchers like Ivan Rodriguez and Paul Lo Duca will go way before him with their greater name recognition and they likely offer less production.

Pedro Feliz (3B, Philadelphia Phillies)

Another Philly who can cash in on a bandbox home stadium, Feliz never seems to get any love from fantasy writers. He's never going to be top-10 material, but if you've missed out on the frenzy addressing needs elsewhere, then Feliz is a viable option who can also fill out any utility spots.

He had his big year in San Francisco in 2006 (22 homers and 98 batted in), but he's young enough (33 in April) to get somewhere around those numbers again in a more friendly hitting park. He'll likely hit sixth or seventh in the order, but in the NL's strongest batting lineup, that will give him plenty of RBI and run scoring opportunities.

Kelly Johnson (2B, Atlanta Braves)

Chase Utley dominates second basemen, but you'll need a top-8-10 pick to grab him so where can you grab some reasonable production in the lower rounds?

Johnson is likely to be still hanging around on the board in the 15th round, but he's potentially a lot better than that. He blazed a trail in April and ended the month with a mighty OPS of 1.066. He couldn't keep that up, but had a steady season until September when he tanked. I'm expecting a much stronger second season as a starter and at 26 by opening day, there's improvement to be had.

Bobby Cox regularly sat him against lefties, but that's unlikely to be repeated in 2008 as he managed to finish the year a robust .272 in 158 AB's vs LHP. He'll hopefully start the season at the top of the line-up, though Cox does move his guys up and down the card, which means he'll bag around 100 runs with the strong Atlanta hitting and he has enough power to get 20 homers and 70 RBI's. That's not a bad return from a guy drafted in the beer-fog rounds.

Luke Scott (OF, Baltimore Orioles)

Unless you're in a really deep league, Scott will start the season on the waiver wire. He's going straight on my watch list as there's some hope that he could finally put it together and have a decent full season.

Scott has the potential for strong power numbers, but he could never convince the Houston brass that he was a long-term prospect. He had a good 2006 with only 214 ABs, but a sturdy .336/.426/.622 (AVE/OBP/SLG) that augured well for his future, but it never came off in Texas. A fresh start in Baltimore where he'll be the regular left fielder is just what he needs.

He managed a career high 369 ABs last year with 18 homers and 64 RBIs. Strangely, he hit an abysmal .208/.305/.422 at his home postage stamp-sized stadium and a much better .305/.400/.593 on the road. He also finished the season on a high going .296/.392/.586 after the break. If he can cut down on the whiffs and revert to his 2006 more patient style of hitting, he could bulk up the average.

He's not going to make-or-break anybody's fantasy league standings, but he does have the potential to fill a fpirth outfield spot or fill an injury gap. I'm hoping for a line of 80-25-85-5-.280.

Hank Blalock (3B, Texas Rangers)

The lefty third bagger has been around so long in the majors it's hard to believe he's only 27 and theoretically approaching his peak years. Blalock burst onto the fantasy scene in 2003 with a solid 29 home run 90 runs batted in year and built on that in 2004 (107 R, 32 HR, 110 RBI, 2SB, .276 AVG), but since then, it's been slightly disappointing. Last year was ruined by injury, but he did have a nice comeback from shoulder problems in September (12, 5, 17, 1, .313).

Blalock at his peak was a third- or fourth-round pick and a top-five third baseman. Now he's likely to be still on the boards in the 15th round onwards in 12-team mixed leagues and could be the bargain of the whole draft. The Rangers are no longer the offensive force they were, minus Mark Teixeira, but Blalock will have the benefit of a hitter-friendly home park and a healthy shoulder.

With a full season, I'm predicting 90, 27, 100, 5, .280.

Posted by Mike Round at 11:58 AM | Comments (0)

February 19, 2008

Are We in the Dark Ages of Sport?

Here's a poll for you — which is the most egregious violation of sports ethics?

A) Using steroids or other performance-enhancing drugs

B) Illegal videotaping of opposing team's signals

C) College recruiting violations not including paying players with money and/or promiscuous co-eds

D) Widespread academic fraud within a college sports program

No matter how you answer the poll, the wider point is this: these are the dark ages of sports morality.

Think about it. Every major sport has dealt with some sort of ethical catastrophe over the past few years. Baseball has this congressional circus, as if we need a bunch of mugging politicians to tell us the game was completely corrupted by performance-enhancing drugs. The Giants won the Super Bowl, but that's been barely a pimple on the ass of Spygate. College basketball has Kelvin Sampson, whose apparent blatant disregard for recruiting rules has tarnished both Oklahoma and Indiana.

College football had Florida State suspend more than a third of its team for receiving improper academic "assistance," not to mention the alleged Reggie Bush improprieties at USC. Hockey had the Rick Tocchet gambling scandal. The NBA had Tim Donaghy and Kobe Bryant in Colorado. Track and field had Marion Jones. Cycling had Floyd Landis. Racing had the Renault espionage scandal in Formula 1. Italian soccer was rocked by top clubs paying crooked refs. Men's tennis had the Russian mafia trying to force players to throw matches. Pakistan's cricket coach was murdered.

It's gotten to the point boxing is one of the cleanest sports out there. Boxing! One of the cleanest sports in the world! What in the name of Cecil Peoples is going on here?

To some degree, you can blame it on the media. That's always fun. We have the Mike Lupicas of the world waiting to pounce on the next athlete, coach or GM who dares go wayward from the straight and narrow. In this web-fueled, 24-hour-news-cycle mad world, even the most mild of transgressions can turn into windfalls of ethical carnage.

But that would be shortsighted. Lupica is no more responsible for the baseball steroid scandal or Mike Vick's dog fighting than a mosquito is culpable for spreading malaria. It's not his fault he's a bloodsucker. That's just the way he was born. And besides, the mosquito didn't invent malaria. That was God's fault.

So if not Lupica (or Skip Bayless or Gregg Doyel or Gregg Easterbrook or ten thousand idiots at their keyboards like I am now), then who?

***

The world has thousands of cultures. Many at are odds with each other. Some hate each other to the point they'd willingly kill one of their own just to kill a few more of their enemies. But one thing they all have in common is the will to win. Bill Belichick, Sampson, the frauds, and the juicers just wanted to win. That was more important to them than anything else. Humankind reveres nothing else like it reveres winners. It's always been that way and it always will. If you're not first, you're last. That's just the way it goes.

But why now? Why is it so bad now?

For the answer, I turn to Chris Rock, who once said men were only as faithful as their options. In other words, you could love your wife or girlfriend as much as anything in the world, but if Page 58 of the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition starts getting sexy with you on the dance floor, you're going to have a hard time turning away.

Similarly, most people are only as loyal to the rules as their options are to evade them. Back in 1950, how many ways were there to cheat? A pitcher could cut a ball or use some kind of lubricant to get some extra motion. A basketball player could intentionally miss a few shots so the other team could cover the spread. And while those things might have worked, they also left the offenders in great peril of getting caught. All it took was a batter telling his manager, "Hey, I think that guy is putting something on the ball. It's moving funny." The manager goes out to the ump. The ump goes out to the mound. Badda-bing, badda-boom, ejection and suspension. Play ball.

Now, we've got an army of chemists working on ways to artificially improve the human performance. It's like technology. Most of us are only now finding out about the cutting edge of five years ago. Chances are that as Major League Baseball stumbles to find some way of testing for Human Growth Hormone (and getting the Union to agree with it), the next generation of performance-enhancers is already snaking its way into the market. This fact is and will always remain true — professional sports leagues will never catch up with the science of cheating. They can chase all they want (and it's debatable how much they really want to), but they won't catch up. Ever.

And with this reality in hand, what is the incentive to follow the rules? Oh, sure there's personal integrity and respect for the game. Those are great values I hope my son and daughter carry through their likely limited athletic careers. But if my son was going on year eight in the minor leagues and he thought a chemical could get him over the hump to the point he could start making some major league money and provide for his children's future, could I really damn him for taking the chance? Would you give up your lifelong dream for an ethic?

Belichick taped because he wanted an edge. Sampson called because he wanted an edge. Jones and Landis and Glenallen Hill doped because they wanted an edge. That thrill of victory is a cancer all its own, eating at the souls of those who have spent a lifetime in its pursuit.

And so maybe things will die down. Eventually the vultures back East will have had their fill of the carcasses of athletes gone wrong. Eventually Sampson and Belichick will retire and become footnotes of sports history.

But don't think their successors are going to be any better. There are only so many Tony Dungys to go around. We live in a culture of win at any cost. We want owners to spend tens of millions of dollars for just a slight chance at getting better. We want athletes to play hurt, to the point of crippling themselves for life. We want coaches to ignore their families so they can study more tape, get that edge. We want them to win. We need them to win. And we will boo the living hell out of them if they fail.

So whose fault is it? Nobody's really. But if you're looking for a scapegoat, go find a mirror. We've all got a hand in this madness.

Seth Doria is a writer based out of St. Louis. For the only daily column that mixes sports, politics, and entertainment news in one, visit The Left Calf.

Posted by Joshua Duffy at 10:21 AM | Comments (2)

West Coast Biased

"It's not fair."

The words have been echoing through the halls, from Nassau to Chicago. They are supposed to have the Mecca of basketball. They are supposed to be home to champions. The game started there.

Yet, since Michael Jordan's Bulls walked off into the sunset, the East has hardly been a beast. The teams east of the Mississippi have won two titles in the past 10 years. And one of those teams, Miami, is the worst team in basketball right now.

There was hope for change this year. Detroit has earned the right to be called one of the best teams in the NBA. Cleveland has LeBron James. And, until two weeks ago, it wasn't crazy to think Boston would be hoisting No. 17 up into the rafters.

Not anymore.

As quick as the power shifted to the West with Jordan's departure, the idea that the East was back on the rise has diminished.

Four years ago, you could feel it. Detroit had just upset the Lakers. James was living up to the hype and then some, and the East still had Allen Iverson, Jason Kidd, Paul Pierce, Shaquille O'Neal, and Dwyane Wade.

Now, like a cruel joke, the West is taking it all back. It started last year, with Iverson jumping conferences to Denver from Philly. Then the Los Angeles Lakers went from mediocrity to overnight Finals favorites with the L.A. Larceny. Mitch Kupchak brought in Pau Gasol and, although he stayed in the West, it brought another Western team to the championship picture.

The Lakers recently acquired Gasol and a 2008 second round pick for Kwame Brown, possibly Aaron McKie (salary cap purposes), Javaris Crittenton, Marc Gasol, and Los Angeles' 2008 and 2010 first-round picks.

My first reaction: How? What? They got away with that?

If this were fantasy basketball, that trade would not even lasted a second before being overturned. On a level of 1 to 10, this larceny is a 937.

Over the past three years, the Western Conference has paraded around the Staples Center knowing the big, bad Lakers were no longer big, just bad. Now the Grizzlies hand Los Angeles a gift right back into the Finals picture.

Before the "Laker Larceny" Los Angeles had proven to be a much improved team from the previous season. Andrew Bynum was playing like a future all-star, Derek Fisher provided a grounded leader, and Kobe was being Kobe. The biggest reason for the improvement this season is the Lakers' bench.

Kupchak made a savvy move dealing for Trevor Ariza to solidify a potent bench of Ronny Turiaf, Jordan Farmar, Sasha Vujacic, and Vladimir Radmanovic. That group has averaged over 30 points per game, second only to San Antonio. Kupchak has to be grinning when he looks at the roster he can roll out. Phil Jackson, he'll have to get another hip replacement surgery with all the jumping up and down he's been doing since the deal.

Jackson, a coach known for finding the best matchups, is going to have so many different formulas to work with, it will be impossible to prepare for the Lakers. Los Angeles can go big: C Bynum, PF Gasol, SF Lamar Odom, SG Bryant, PG Fisher. Or they can go smaller: C Bynum, PF Gasol, SF Luke Walton, SG Bryant, PG Fisher. Or even smaller: C Bynum, PF Odom, SF Walton, SG Bryant, PG Fisher. There are so many options with just the first six, never mind how he can mix and match with bench players and starters. There are six players who Jackson can facilitate in and out to keep players rested for the final stretch as well as create mismatches at every position.

Thanks to that deal, everyone in the West felt they needed to follow suit. A week later, the Diesel was heading west. While this trade is not as clear-cut of a winner as was the Gasol deal, a healthy Shaq is still a healthy Shaq.

Shaq wants to solidify his legacy and needs to win one more championship to accomplish that. You can expect him, when he gets healthy, to do everything in his power to prove all the naysayers wrong.

There's nothing scarier than an all-star with a chip on his shoulder.

And now, most recently, Jason Kidd may be ditching the East for Texas.

It's the 21st century's version of manifest destiny, the gold rush and the Oregon Trail all in one.

While stars continue to flee west and the conference gains more and more strength, the East seems content to just roll with the punches. As much talk as there was for Boston in the first half of the season, since the Gasol deal, you can't talk about the NBA without talking about the West and all the different scenarios that are about to bloom as we get closer to playoff basketball.

We won't even mention a Portland team that is a Greg Oden away from competing, or Denver, San Antonio, Houston, and New Orleans, the best team in the West at the All-Star Break. Nine teams are within four and a half games of first. The 10th-place team in the West would be sixth in the East right now.

Does the East deserve an underperforming Bulls team, and the Knicks? No. Will it be a while before the East makes things interesting again in the Finals? Yes.

It's not like the East doesn't have the pieces to make some deals happen. Danny Ainge did it, grabbing two Western all-stars and sending them East. Orlando made a move, bringing in Rashard Lewis. Yet the East has done nothing to facilitate a wow from the NBA faithful since Boston's "Three Party."

There is one bright spot. Unlike the late-'90s when Jordan left, the East is loaded in youth this time around. The Hawks, Magic, Bulls, Raptors, and Cavs all have young talent, and will get the East on the right spot if those players live up to their potential.

Why, though, does the East feel it's okay to sit stagnant while the West truly becomes the Wild, Wild West? In your mind, can you honestly see anyone besides Boston or Detroit winning the championship? Now while you're there, how many teams can you see from the West?

During the All-Star Game, Doug Collins mentioned this year might be the first time a 50-win team doesn't make the playoffs. At the same time, there is a possibility a 50-loss team could make it in from the East.

So East Coast, you have two options. Find Doc Brown and travel back to 1990, or head into the future, and wait for Danny Ferry to get LeBron some help, or Dwight Howard to become the beast he is destined to become.

Until then, you're right East side, it's not fair.

Posted by Wailele Sallas at 10:20 AM | Comments (0)

February 18, 2008

Can Giants and Pats Draft Way Back?

Two weeks after on the best Super Bowls in the history of the NFL, the dust from the Eli Manning-to- David Tyree miracle play has settled and the smoke from New England's late-game implosion has cleared.

Okay, maybe not. The play is still a fixture on YouTube, it will be a staple of "SportsCenter" highlight reels for decades, Bill Belichick and the Patriots are still mired in the Spygate controversy, and endless Super Bowl XLII discussion is still rampant. Nonetheless, there is time enough to break away from the past for just a moment and instead discuss the future. Namely the future of these two esteemed franchises.

Can the New York Giants and New England Patriots make a return trip to the Super Bowl for a rematch in the 53rd edition of America's biggest sporting event? Well, the long road back begins now in preparation for the 2008 NFL Draft.

While the Patriots' offense fizzled in the Super Bowl under the constant pressure of the Giants' defensive line, that unit is obviously still borderline flawless. It's the defense that has to be addressed, and the most glaring problem on that side of the ball is without question the age of the linebacker corps. Mike Vrabel is 32, Tedy Bruschi is 34 (and an old 34 at that), and Junior Seau just turned 39. That's right; the two insider linebackers sport a combined age of 73. Yep, I'd say it's time for an overhaul.

Unfortunately for New England, the top inside linebackers available in the 2008 draft are not worth drafting with the seventh overall pick (that's where the Patriots stand thanks to owning San Francisco's first-round pick). James Laurinaitis would have been an enticing option, but he decided to go back to Ohio State. That leaves another Buckeye, Vernon Gholston, as the only real option if the Patriots want to address the linebacker position with the seventh pick. Gholston was a monster at defensive end for Ohio State, but he can also be converted to outside linebacker in New England's 3-4 scheme. Again, the more glaring need is inside, but the Patriots also could upgrade at one of the defensive end positions, so perhaps Gholston could remain at DE for a while; at least until Vrabel decides to call it a career.

If Bill Belichick really wants to meet the needs of the immediate present rather than solve the linebacker issue that could be an even bigger problem one or two years down the road, then he could go cornerback in the first round. Asante Samuel is almost certainly on the way out via free agency and the quality depth at the position is not there to sufficiently replace him from within. That means South Florida cornerback Mike Jenkins could be packing his bags for New England. Jenkins has the size, speed, and athleticism to make an immediate impact at the next level and he can also help out in the return game if the Patriots want to preserve Wes Welker's health for primarily wide receiver duties.

The decision might be made easier for the Patriots, as Gholston is coveted by several teams picking ahead of New England. At least one of two premier cornerbacks in the draft (Jenkins and Leodis McKelvin from Troy) will certainly be available at number seven.

The Super Bowl champion Giants are not lucky enough to own the draft pick of one of the worst teams in the NFL, so they will not be selecting until the very end of the first round. That's not to say the 32nd slot lacks importance or is incapable of yielding an immediate-impact player. There will definitely be players who have the talent to start as rookies available at this point of the draft, and while the Giants are the champs, it's not like they don't have any holes.

Like the Patriots, New York needs to take a long, hard look at its corps of linebackers. Kawika Mitchell flanks MLB Antonio Pierce on one side, but an upgrade is necessary on the other side. Keith Rivers of USC and Dan Connor, who enjoyed a renowned career at Penn State, could both fall all the way down to No. 32. If that doesn't happen, Oklahoma's Curtis Lofton is shooting up draft boards and should draw some serious attention from the Giants at the upcoming NFL combine.

Realizing that the Giants and Patriots are already linked by their epic Super Bowl encounter as well as their most glaring need at the NFL draft, you can probably guess New York's second biggest area of concern. Yep, cornerback. Sam Madison is 33-years-old and if Bruschi is an old 34, Madison is an ancient 33. Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie and Antoine Cason look like potential steals at the end of the first round.

One thing the Giants should definitely avoid is taking a running back early in the draft. Some experts say they need a change-of-pace back to platoon with the punishing Brandon Jacobs. Last I checked, however, Ahmad Bradshaw handled that duty to perfection at the end of the regular season and throughout the postseason. And even if Bradshaw is not as good his spurts of brilliance would suggest, Jacobs is certainly capable of being an every-down running back in the NFL. I still think some of the Patriots' defenders must be reeling from the hits Jacobs put on them in the Super Bowl. That's right — Jacobs was hitting the defenders; the defenders weren't hitting Jacobs.

If the Giants insist on improving the offense early in the draft (they probably shouldn't), the only logical areas to address are offensive line and wide receiver. Of course now that Plaxico Burress and David Tyree have recently added a Super Bowl-winning touchdown catch and the greatest catch in Super Bowl history to their resumes, respectively, perhaps that position is no longer an issue. Offensive tackle, however, should be looked at and some possibilities at No. 32 would include Pittsburgh's Jeff Otah, Mississippi's Michael Oher, and Vanderbilt's Chris Williams.

The bottom line is that as good as the Patriots were last year and as good as the Giants looked at the end of the year, neither team can sit idly this offseason if it hopes to make it back to the Super Bowl. Sure, free agency could end up being the most important factor between now and the start of the 2008 season, but just as easily, the NFL draft could be the difference between winning and losing next year and could definite the fate of each franchise's future.

Then again, both teams could always just bag the first five rounds and draft the second coming of Tom Brady in the sixth. That doesn't sound like a bad plan.

Guess who else was drafted in the sixth round.

Yes. You guessed it. One David Tyree.

Posted by Ricky Dimon at 11:50 AM | Comments (0)

Signs of the Time

Ebbets Field begat the Sign Man of Shea.

Among the fans who were almost as legendary as the team, the Brooklyn Dodgers had Hilda Chester (with the fishwife yowl and the iron frying pan banged with a ladle) in the bleachers and the Dodger Sym-Phony Band (nine fans whose musical ability rivaled that of quadriplegic seals, but were beloved regardless) behind the dugout.

But the Bums also bequeathed a comparable character to the New York Mets, a former Dodger fan who took up residence in the Shea Stadium third-base box seats, brandishing perfectly lettered, often punny signs, ready to hoist at the drop of a ball, a strike, a travesty, or a miracle.

The Mets' advent either introduced or restored the art of banners in the stands, but Karl Ehrhardt — who died at 83 at his Queens home February 5th — refined it into a mad art from the season Shea Stadium opened, carrying a box of professionally block-lettered, 20x26 signs, colorful lettering on black folding placards, each tabbed, presumably, with its legend, the better to let him whip one up on the spot.

"Before I went to the ballpark," he told the New York Times two years ago, "I would try to crystal-ball what might happen that particular day. I would read all the newspapers to learn who was hot and who was in a slump, stuff like that, and create my signs accordingly."

A commercial artist by profession (he was graduated from Pratt Institute with a design degree after his service as a translator for American forces in World War II), Ehrhardt's ballpark art never went madder than his performance during the 1973 World Series. His inspiration was Oakland Athletics owner Charlie Finley trying to bury infielder Mike Andrews (including with a pressurized order for a medical exam) after a bad day with the glove helped cost the Mustache Gang a game.

Sure enough, in the following day's game an Athletic booted one. Sure enough, Ehrhardt had a sign ready and hoisted: YOU'RE FIRED! (Watching the camera pans on television, I could have sworn that even a few of the A's were laughing, even like Figaro, that they might not weep — or measure Finley for a necktie party.)

It isn't that Ehrhardt wasn't prepared to let a Met have it for feats of derring don't. When youthful first baseman Ed Kranepool hit a particularly arduous skid, Ehrhardt greeted him invariable with a sign saying IS KRANEPOOL OVER THE HILL? (Always the signs were in upper-case lettering.) When Jose Cardenal underwent a protracted spell of forgetting the strike zone, Ehrhardt was only too well prepared: JOSE, CAN YOU SEE? Fielders' boots were likely to be answered with LOOK, MA — NO HANDS. Hitters breaking out of long slumps were likely to be greeted with IT'S ALIVE!

He was magnificent during the Mets' first championship run, right down to October 16, 1969, Game 5 against the Baltimore Orioles. When Frank Robinson got into a broiling debate with an umpire over close play at second base? BACK TO YOUR NEST, BIRD! With two out in the top of the ninth? BYE, BYE, BIRDIES! When future Met manager Davey Johnson skied to Cleon Jones in left, Jones making the catch that sent New York into cheerful apoplexy: THERE ARE NO WORDS.

Perhaps only Ehrhardt himself could top that, when he was invited to sit in one of the open parade cars as the Miracle Mets were given the Canyon of Heroes treatment for the first time. There he was, hoisting for just about the entire drive, THEY SAID IT COULDN'T BE DONE.

Let the Mets knock an opposing pitcher out of the box early in a game? LEAVING SO SOON? But let an opposing pitcher hand a Met an intentional walk, however, and Ehrhardt proved he didn't need words all the time, a mere picture would do. One favorite for the intentional walk was an image of a chicken, which on camera resembled the logo of the ancient Chicken Delight takeout joint.

Ehrhardt may have pinned at least one player with a nickname, never mind that the player was ambivalent about it for a good while. When Dave Kingman launched his first mammoth regular-season bomb in Mets silks, Ehrhardt was prepared: KONG!

(To be fair, Ehrhardt didn't limit his Kingman raves to that motif. Once, as Kingman approached the plate, Ehrhardt hoisted THE KING OF SWING. On another occasion marked by a transcontinental Kingman launch, this one clearing the back-most bullpen fence: CALLING LONG DISTANCE!)

He was part of the Shea show from 1964 until the end of the 1981 season. No one has ever explained within my earshot just why he gave it up, and I don't remember reading anything about why he gave it up. But he wasn't even close to forgotten. As if to prove it, the Mets brought him back for the franchise's 40th anniversary. Ehrhardt, typically, was prepared for the occasion: THE SIGN MAN LIVES!

Eternally.

Posted by Jeff Kallman at 11:07 AM | Comments (0)

February 16, 2008

The 25 Most Successful NFL Quarterbacks

Explanations for the system will follow the rankings.

The following grading standard was applied for grading each quarterback:

The top 25 are listed with statistics and notes about each player. Current players are listed in all caps.

25. Dave Krieg — 73 points

0 Super Bowl Rings; 38,147 passing yards; 261 TD passes; 3 Pro Bowl Selections

Krieg's primary target, Steve Largent, retired in 1989. Needless to say, Krieg's statistics began to plummet starting in 1990. Krieg is also the quarterback who was sacked 7 times in one game by the late, great Derrick Thomas.

24. Boomer Esiason — 73 points

0 Super Bowl Rings; 37,920 passing yards; 247 TD passes; 4 Pro Bowl Selections

A good quarterback on a finicky team. For example, in 1988, Boomer threw for 28 TDs and 14 interceptions and led the Bengals to the Super Bowl. In 1989, Boomer had an even better season, with 28 TDs and only 11 interceptions, but the Bengals didn't even make the playoffs. Boomer gets the edge over Krieg for an actual Super Bowl appearance and for not having Steve Largent.

23. John Hadl — 75 points

0 Super Bowl Rings; 1 AFL Championship; 33,503 passing yards, 244 TD passes, 6 Pro Bowl Selections

Hadl was the quarterback for the San Diego Chargers though the 1960s. He played in 16 seasons, piling up the statistics, but should have retired after 12.

22. Roger Staubach — 75 points

2 Super Bowl Rings; 22,700 passing yards; 153 TD passes, 6 Pro Bowl Selections

The two Super Bowl victories were part of a fairly impressive 12-7 overall playoff record for Staubach. Though his statistics aren't amazing, Staubach was a great leader for a dominant Cowboys team throughout the 1970s. Staubach gets the nod over Hadl due to his winning record.

21. Vinny Testaverde — 79 points

0 Super Bowl Rings; 46,233 passing yards; 275 TD passes; 2 Pro Bowl Selections

The old man never gives up. Now in his 21st NFL season, Testaverde is the epitome of perseverance, starting only five playoff games in his entire career. Testaverde has been on mediocre teams throughout his life and has kept with it and amassed some amazing stats.

20. Drew Bledsoe — 81 points

0 Super Bowl Rings; 44,611 passing yards; 251 TD passes; 4 Pro Bowl Selections

Mr. Immobile himself was a good quarterback in his own right for the New England Patriots. It is rather unfortunate that he had to give way to Tom Brady right as the Patriots' true dynasty began, which we have not seen the end of quite yet.

19. George Blanda — 81 points

2 AFL Championships; 26,920 passing yards; 236 TD passes; 4 Pro Bowl Selections

Blanda is the oldest of old men. Testaverde has six years to go to match Blanda's ridiculous 27-year career. Though Blanda threw 277 INTs and had a completion % of under 50%, he was still able to hang tough nearly to age 50, and nobody else can even come close to saying that. Not to mention, he also played kicker for many seasons.

18. Sonny Jurgenson — 82 points

1 NFL Championship; 32,224 passing yards; 255 TD passes; 5 Pro Bowl Selections

Jurgenson was one of the great 1960s quarterbacks. He built large numbers in yards and touchdowns and led the league 5 times in passing yards and twice in TD passes.

17. Otto Graham — 85 points

3 NFL Championships; 23,584 passing yards; 174 TD passes; 5 Pro Bowl Selections

If you add the AAFC championships to the total, Graham would have another 40 points and be up at number six right after John Elway. I know very little about Graham and his play, but he was obviously a winner.

16. Dan Fouts — 86 points

0 Super Bowl Rings; 43,040 passing yards; 254 TD passes; 6 Pro Bowl Selections

Fouts led the Chargers through some rather lean years with some rather large numbers. Had he been on a better team, who knows how impressive he could have been.

15. TOM BRADY — 87 points

3 Super Bowl Rings; 26,370 passing yards; 197 TD passes; 4 Pro Bowl Selections

Brady will undoubtedly move up on this list and who really knows how far. He seems to be highly durable and with more weapons now than ever, he may be in the top five before too long.

14. Bob Griese — 88 points

2 Super Bowl Rings; 25,092 passing yards; 192 TD passes; 8 Pro Bowl Selections

Griese led a great Dolphin team in the 1970s and took advantage of the "No-Named Defense" who helped him win two rings, one of them flawless.

13. Len Dawson — 92 points

1 Super Bowl Ring; 1 AFL Championship; 28,711 passing yards; 239 TD passes; 7 Pro Bowl Selections

A true AFL stud, Dawson helped the AFL gain some real credibility along with playboy Joe Namath.

12. Troy Aikman — 96 points

3 Super Bowl Rings; 32,942 passing yards; 165 TD passes; 6 Pro Bowl Selections

With a few less concussions, Aikman could have quite easily been a top-10 pick. Also, slightly depressing his touchdown numbers is the fact that Emmitt Smith ran in a lot of touchdowns for the Cowboys in the '90s that could have easily belonged to Aikman's arm. Aikman was surrounded by a great team and he helped build them from the ground up starting in their most dismal season, 1989.

11. Steve Young — 97 points

2 Super Bowl Rings; 33,124 passing yards; 232 TD passes; 7 Pro Bowl Selections

Steve Young is a very interesting pick. Young took Joe Montana's job and that in and of itself is amazing. He played great for many years and honestly missed at least four seasons sitting on the bench behind Montana. Granted, he probably learned a lot from Montana, but he wasn't able to pile up the stats like many of the people ahead of him on this list. Something I did not include in the statistics of this list that would have benefited Young more than anybody else is rushing touchdowns of which Young had 43.

10. Terry Bradshaw — 97 points

4 Super Bowl Rings; 27,989 passing yards; 212 TD passes; 3 Pro Bowl Selections

Bradshaw was a great leader and a real winner, going 14-5 in the playoffs. Though he threw 210 interceptions, his touchdown and yard numbers are also relatively low due to the style of Pittsburgh football. Who can blame them, though? With Franco Harris in the backfield, I would have run a lot, as well.

9. Bart Starr — 101 points

3 NFL Championships; 2 Super Bowl Rings; 24,718 passing yards; 152 TD passes; 4 Pro Bowl Selections

The winner of all winners, Starr and the Packers of the early 1960s were phenomenal. Starr's the type of man who could make a 7-3 victory as exciting as New Year's Eve in Time's Square.

8. Warren Moon — 105 points

0 Super Bowl Rings; 49,325 passing yards; 291 TD passes; 9 Pro Bowl Selections

One of three top 10 performers plagued by the zero in the first column, Moon led the massively talented Houston Oilers to plenty of disappointing early playoff exits.

7. PEYTON MANNING — 105 points

1 Super Bowl Ring; 41,626 passing yards; 306 TD passes; 8 Pro Bowl Selections

Undoubtedly, Manning will move up on this list. Manning's poise and ability to control a game are astounding. Nobody in history can drive a team down the field as fast and as efficiently as Manning. Whether or not he winds up at No. 6, No. 1, or somewhere in between depends on rings and the always important health.

6. Fran Tarkenton — 108 points

0 Super Bowl Rings; 47,003 passing yards; 342 TD passes; 9 Pro Bowl Selections

Not quite as bad as Jim Kelly (who is actually number 26 from what I can tell on this list), but 0-3 in Super Bowls isn't good for the reputation. Tarkenton revolutionized the way a quarterback could play with his uncanny ability to escape from defenders.

5. John Elway — 128 points

2 Super Bowl Rings; 51,475 passing yards; 300 TD passes; 9 Pro Bowl Selections

The majority of Elway's true success came in his last two seasons and if he didn't win rings in those seasons, he'd still be at about the same spot and I'd wonder why, but given his run of winning his last seven playoff games including two Super Bowl victories, he's a solid number 5.

4. Johnny Unitas — 129 points

1 Super Bowl Ring; 2 NFL Championships; 40,239 passing yards; 290 TD passes; 10 Pro Bowl Selections

Unitas was a real stud for the era he played in, compiling an amazing amounts of yards and touchdowns and a consistently dominant career. It's a shame that the thing he's often most remembered for is losing to the ever cocky Joe Namath in Super Bowl III.

3. Dan Marino — 130 points

0 Super Bowl Rings; 61,361 passing yards; 420 TD passes; 9 Pro Bowl Selections

Marino was also cursed with no rings and his only comfort were the numerous records he possessed, which are almost all gone thanks to the likes of Brett Favre. Marino was a great quarterback though and helped the transformation of NFL offenses into a wide-open passing game perhaps more than any other quarterback. He did it extremely well, but he won't ever ascend to the ranks of number one with no rings on his fingers.

2. Joe Montana — 131 points

4 Super Bowl Rings; 40,551 passing yards; 273 TD passes; 8 Pro Bowl Selections

"The Quarterback" falls short of number one due to one thing and one thing only — longevity. If he could have played another four or five seasons, Montana would have another 30+ points under his belt and be virtually untouchable. In his prime, I think you'd be hard pressed to find a better all-around player than Joe Montana. Such sweeping vision, deft delivery, and his unmistakable ability to lead a team from a seemingly impossible deficit are unmatched. If I could relive a decade, it would be the 1980s, purely to see Montana in every single 49ers game. Watching him simply gives me a sense of peace, as if everything in the world must make sense.

1. BRETT FAVRE — 141 points

1 Super Bowl Ring; 61,655 passing yards; 442 TD passes; 9 Pro Bowl Selections

The value of Brett Favre goes beyond mere statistics. What other quarterback can boast that during his tenure, his current division opponents (Chicago, Detroit, Minnesota) have started more than 50 quarterbacks combined? His consistency, patience, and leadership for the Green Bay Packers throughout the past 16 years have been beyond measure. But perhaps the greatest thing he brings to the Pack is his contagious attitude, his wondrous smile, and his unmatchable ability to overcome personal adversity and win in spite of it. A true number one pick, Favre maintains a high success rate, while also holding true to the intangibles that make a man great.

***

Note the title please, it is very intentional. This is a list of most the successful quarterbacks, not my opinion who is or was the best. It includes both AFL and NFL players, but does not include AAFC (hence why Otto Graham is No. 17 on the list and not No. 6 or better).

There are certain things in professional football that you cannot measure without being an MIT graduate, i.e. strength of teammates, coaches, or opponents; the difference between statistics in the 1960s versus statistics in the 21st century; starting 200+ straight games; being injury-prone; personal problems; or the ability to make ones teammates better players. The intangibles of being a football player are not measurable by me, so I make no attempt to do so. This list attempts to determine which quarterbacks were the most successful in the American professional football leagues of the AFL and NFL.

I personally think that the quarterbacks list came out pretty close to what I would select, although I kind of hope numbers 20-25 disappear off of the list very quickly. Perhaps Matt Hasselbeck (45 points), Jeff Garcia (45 points), Drew Brees (39 points), Ben Roethlisberger (32), Carson Palmer (30 points), and Eli Manning (28 points) will keep piling up the statistics.

Lists of a similar nature for running backs and wide receivers will be released shortly.

Posted by Andrew Jones at 11:13 AM | Comments (3)

February 15, 2008

All the Rage of Mid-Majors

Small schools. Shockers. Cinderella stories. Bracket Busters. They go by so many names, but one thing is for sure. Schools from the mid-major conferences, or as popularly termed "mid-majors," make you take a second look at your bracket come tourney time. You had Cleveland State beating Indiana in '86? Sure. Richmond over Syracuse in '91? Gotcha. Manhattan beating Oklahoma in '95, Princeton beating defending champ UCLA in '96, Coppin State over South Carolina in '97, Valparaiso to the Sweet 16 in '98, or Gonzaga in '99? Whatever makes you feel better.

Whatever it may be, we look at our list and check it twice like St. Nick at Christmas time when it comes to those games pitting schools from major conferences against mid-majors. Why else would you think hard about No. 6 vs. No. 11, No. 5 vs. No. 12, No. 4 vs. No. 13, or No. 3 vs. No. 14 when filling out your bracket? Now when we see the Butlers, Gonzagas, and Northwestern State's of the world, we shouldn't sell them so short. Now mid-majors are in some cases mainstays around Top 25 polls and within the respectable range in RPI rankings. Looking forward to March, here are five mid-major programs that you might want to keep an eye on come Championship Week.

Note: these are not the necessarily the five best mid-majors, just teams to be mindful of.

Butler (Horizon League)

You know the kid who's wasn't really popular, but gets an invite to the party he's been waiting for? Then when he gets there, he really does some cool things to impress people, got invited back and now he's "cool?" Butler is that cool kid. A run to the Sweet 16 last season and a constant spot in the Top 25 has Butler looking to be a factor in the national picture for the tourney, where a No. 3 seed may be in their calling. Balance is what suits the Bulldogs, who have four players who average double-digits in scoring, led by senior guards Mike Green and A.J. Graves at 15.4 and 13.4 points a contest, respectively. Pete Campbell is a versatile forward who can shoot from the outside.

Butler is scrappy, quick, and great at shooting. Already on the victims list for the Bulldogs for this season from the majors: Michigan, Ohio State, Texas Tech, and Florida State. They have to finish the season strong and despite having won 14 of their last 15, there are some defensive issues they need to work out to jockey for position in the brackets. Either way, the Bulldogs are looking to be more than just being one of the cool kids at the party in March.

Drake (Missouri Valley)

Raise your hand if you actually know where Drake University is. After a loss to St. Mary's in their second game, the Bulldogs from Des Moines, IA ripped off 21 straight wins and hopped right into the Top 25. Missouri Valley Conference leading scorer Josh Young and leading rebounder Jonathan Cox, led by a supporting cast of Leonard Houston, Adam Emmenecker, and Klayton Korver (younger brother of Utah Jazz and former Creighton Blue Jay forward Kyle Korver), Drake has made its hallmark of playing solid, but not great defense and pulling out close games. The argument against Drake by some is their lack of solid competition. Their latest setback against Southern Illinois will only amplify the critics, but a win in a huge "Bracket Buster" game at Butler on Feb. 23 could do a lot to silence the doubters. Either way, these Bulldogs are sitting in good shape for the regular season crown in the MVC.

St. Mary's (West Coast)

The Gaels have beaten them all: the good, the bad, and the ugly. In the ultra-competitive West Coast Conference, where for the better part of the last decade, any team not named Gonzaga was settling for the role of bridesmaid, St. Mary's has managed to stay a step ahead of the Bulldogs and San Diego in the standings. They are tough to beat at home, delivered Drake one of its two losses on the season, and picked up impressive wins over Oregon, Seton Hall, and Ohio. Patrick Mills, Omar Samhan, and Co. need to be careful. One loss down the stretch in conference play could cough up the WCC title to Gonzaga or San Diego. Another "Bracket Buster" buster game on Feb. 23: Kent State from the MAC comes to St. Mary's, where the Gaels have yet to lose this season.

VCU (Colonial)

After upsetting Duke in the first round of last year's tournament, Virginia Commonwealth came in with George Mason, a clear favorite in the CAA. Led by the talented Eric Maynor, who leads the conference in assists and second in scoring, the Rams are making a push for a second consecutive bid in the Big Dance. A setback at George Mason on Jan. 29, may go a long way towards determining the regular season champ. Either way, despite early wins against Houston and Maryland, it seems the winner of CAA tourney may get the conferences' only bid. It seems to be a two-horse race between the Patriots and the Rams. Anthony Grant continues to be a hot commodity in the coaching ranks. Circle Feb. 23 for the Rams, as well. They travel to Akron to face the Zips.

South Alabama (Sun Belt)

There may be other talented teams in the Sun Belt conference, but it's clearly two teams head and shoulders above the rest: Western Kentucky and South Alabama. The Jaguars are neck and neck with the Hilltoppers, in first place by virtue of their head-to-head win against WKU 65-61 on Jan. 5. Demetric Bennett leads four Jaguars who average double figures at just over 20 points a game and exhibits the kind of senior guard leadership that can give South Alabama a chance at an upset if awarded a bid to the tournament. Sophomore point guard Domonic Tilford isn't bad, at just less than 15 points a game. The Jaguars have a fight with the Hilltoppers for the rest of regular season for the Sun Belt regular season title, which could very well be decided when they visit Bowling Green for the rematch on Feb. 21.

Posted by Brian Cox at 10:49 AM | Comments (0)

February 14, 2008

Sports Q&A: Clemens-McNamee

Anna from Bullock, TX writes, "The Roger Clemens/Brian McNamee saga gets juicier by the minute. Can it get any better?"

Needles, vials, and bloody gauze? Jose Canseco's house? Roger Clemen's wife? Shouldn't shady Hollywood scumbag Tom Sizemore be in this picture, with Amy Winehouse providing the soundtrack? If this fiasco continues in this manner, I'll have to put a parental block on Major League Baseball in my home, and I don't even have kids. With a teaser like used drug paraphernalia, Canseco, and Debbie Clemens, this story has to get better to reach the expectations I have for scandalous baseball trials. At this rate of increasing sleaze, this trial will have to be televised on early morning Cinemax.

We don't simply expect this story to get better; we demand it. In our tabloid-driven society, the Clemens/McNamee circus fits like a glove when compared against the exploits of train wrecks like Britney Spears and O.J. Simpson. We watch in wonder as the lives of our entertainment and sports heroes spiral downward, fueled by greed, pride, arrogance, illicit drugs, bad decisions, and manipulative lawyers and advisers. Weened on the trite and commonplace baseball scandals of old, like the Black Sox throwing the World Series, or Pete Rose betting on baseball, or Billy Martin and Reggie Jackson arguing on the dugout steps, our appetites for lecherous fodder have reached epic proportions. And the test of wills between a seven-time Cy Young Award winner and his former personal trainer promises to satisfy our urges.

McNamee claims he injected Clemens at least 16 times with steroids and human growth hormone in 1998, 2000, and 2001, years when syringes were spitting more juice than the mouths of the hundreds of tobacco-chewing ball players. Ironically, Clemens is once again telling McNamee where he can stick it. How McNamee could remember the exact number of injections seemed uncanny, until he revealed that he has evidence in the form of used needles and bloody gauze from some of those very injections, he claims. Either he's a meticulous record-keeper, or he's taken baseball souvenirs to another level.

Of course, Clemens and his counsel, Rusty Hardin, doubt the authenticity of the evidence, claiming that McNamee could have just grabbed a random needle and some gauze and just said it held Clemens DNA (chances are, though, a random needle probably would have Clemens' DNA on it). Besides, Clemens and Hardin suggest, what kind of sick person would hold on to used drug paraphernalia when you can take it to the local health department and get brand new replacements?

McNamee's claims are damning, if true. But there's more. There's his contention that he injected Clemens' wife, Debbie, with HGH, under Roger's supervision, as part of her regimen to tone up for a Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue. And McNamee says he remembers seeing Clemens at a party in Miami hosted by none other than novelist and the man who knows everyone who's used steroids, bad boy Jose Canseco. I know what you're thinking, and I hate to burst your bubble, but Debbie Clemens was not at Canseco's Tupperware party, and Canseco did not do blow off her hind end, although I seem to recall a similar scene in The Surreal Life, season five.

It's plausible McNamee could have been mistaken about Roger Clemens' presence at Canseco's party, which was attended by several players and announcers, but it's not plausible that he would have been "mistaken" about the one time he injected Debbie Clemens. I mean, most guys remember their first threesome in vivid, glorious detail. I bet he's got souvenirs from that magical moment, but those we'll never see. Roger Clemens definitely does not want his wife involved in this situation because, as the wife of an accused steroid user, she's been asked questions involving the "little prick" a painful and inordinate amount of times.

And the fact that Canseco is once again involved in a steroid case is amazing. Amazing for the reason that his words, in this case, actually support the cause of the person accused of using steroids. Normally, it's the other way around. Usually, Canseco claims a player used steroids, and that player's legal team immediately goes on the attack to discredit Canseco. In the Clemens' case, Canseco says he doesn't remember Clemens being at his party in 1998. So, some of the plausibility of the Clemens' case rests on the word of Jose Canseco? That's a sign that your case is in trouble. Who are Clemens' next character witnesses? Hanz and Franz?

But let's give Canseco some credit. His book Juiced was criticized as a book fraught with inaccuracies and embellished accusations. Now it looks as though Canseco was right about everything in his book, and he's being lauded as a highly credible witness. So the Clemens' camp must be thinking "Clemens' account + Canseco testimony = vindication." That's crazy math. A more proven equation involving Canseco is "warning track power + Canseco's head = home run." But that's useless in court or in front of Congress.

And what's with Clemens going to Washington, D.C. and hobnobbing with members of the House oversight committee, the very people who tore him a new one on Wednesday? If you watched or listened to the spectacle, you can tell it's obvious the Congressmen and Congresswomen are taking sides. I guess an autographed baseball will make a sick kid's day, as well as earn you preferential treatment on Capitol Hill. But as Clemens and McNamee were grilled Wednesday, it became clear that this is just the beginning of what will be a long, arduous, and interesting journey.

Clemens seemed to be making up answers as he went along, using awkward terminology, such as "knowingly knowing," "misremember," and "honestly." While purporting his respect and admiration for Andy Pettitte and Chuck Knoblach, whose testimony supports that of McNamee, Clemens basically called them liars. McNamee didn't fare much better. His words seemed genuine most of the time, but I got the feeling most members of the committee believed him most when he admitted about lying previously.

Then, the National Enquirer and other periodicals got the scoop they've been waiting for, when the subject turned to Clemens' butt, then to his nanny. That's tabloid gold, the old "butt and nanny" storyline, as well as an upcoming episode of Nip/Tuck. And it gives former president Bill Clinton a fond, reminiscent feeling. The Clemens/McNamee saga has something for everyone, from the sports fan down to the soap opera-addicted housewife. If it hasn't already captured the attention of all of America, it soon will. And we'll all follow it like the paparazzi tailing Britney Spears. Let's not act surprised when the photographs of Clemens sans underwear take this situation to the scurrilous stratosphere.

Richard from Pontiac, MI asks, "Who will win the Daytona 500?"

I like the No. 88 car of Dale Earnhardt, Jr. Hendrick Motorsports cars traditionally run well at Daytona, and with new teammate Jimmie Johnson on the pole, and former teammate Michael Waltrip beside Johnson, Earnhardt will have fast cars with which to work the draft, as well as cushion him from any Tony Stewart/Kurt Busch brush-ups.

Last year, Earnhardt was often plagued by mechanical issues, and he failed to win a single race. This year, with Hendrick power and reliability under the hood, don't be surprised if Junior wins multiple times. In fact, I wouldn't be shocked if the Hendrick stable of Johnson, Jeff Gordon, Earnhardt, and Casey Mears finish 1,2,3, 28th in the Sprint Cup point standings.

Finally free from the wicked spell of Dale Earnhardt, Incorporated queen mother Teresa Earnhardt, Junior's thoughts will solely be on driving, and not on contracts, company shares, and legacies. And, the last Dale not named Earnhardt to win at Daytona, Dale Jarrett, also drove the No. 88 car.

Get Your Questions Answered!

Do you have a question or comment? Are you demanding a blockbuster NBA trade? Does seeing Bill Belichick in a director's chair outside your home creep you out? Did Mike Tice fall through in getting you those Hannah Montana tickets? Then send your demands/concerns/questions along with your name and hometown to [email protected].

Posted by Jeffrey Boswell at 11:55 AM | Comments (0)

Slant Pattern Soccer Quick Hitches

My favorite team in the English Premier team, Portsmouth, made a move to close the January transfer window that is disappointing on several levels.

They brought in striker Jermain Defoe from Tottenham, and to fund the move, they sold their own top striker, Benjani Mwaruwari, to Manchester City.

* Defoe is a solid player who often features on the English National team, albeit mostly on the subsitute's bench. Portsmouth coach Harry Redknapp explained the move as one that makes sense in that he's unloaded a top-level 29-year-old striker in return top-level 25-year-old striker.

But I'm not convinced. I lurked at the Tottenham message boards to gauge their reaction to the move. They were sad to see Defoe go because they had high regard for his character, but all felt there was no room for him on the team any longer. One even asked, "With Defoe gone, who is our fourth striker now?"

So not only did Pompey sell the EPL's third leading scorer for Tottenham's fourth best striker, but Benjani was a fan favorite to end all fan favorites. That's what really makes this sting. Benjani's work rate is out of this world, he's always smiling, and always points to the fans when he scores a goal. He was reportedly devastated with the news and wanted a long term career in Portsmouth. I'm gonna be sick.

With a new stadium in the offing, I had high hopes for Portsmouth to have as good a chance of anyone to challenge the Big Four hegemony, but knowing that Portsmouth cannot really afford both Benjani and Defoe gives me new doubts. At the end of the day though, I have faith in Redknapp to do the right thing and make the right personnel moves. He's demonstrated his canniness time and again.

* In other Portsmouth striker news, Kanu, who was Pompey's leading scorer last year, but whose form has fallen off drastically in the last year and a half, is being linked to an offseason move to an Australian League expansion team, the Gold Coast Galaxy. The ESPN article says the team is "believed to have close ties with the Los Angeles Galaxy."

"Believed?" This is ESPN. They can't verify if there is a connection between the LA Galaxy and Gold Coast Galaxy? Are these soccer franchises or the mafia?

* The U.S. Men's National team looked decent in their 2-2 draw with Mexico last week, but they gave El Tri an alarming number of shots from close range. Ramiro Corrales and Drew Moor, at least defensively, completely flunked their tests. I'd be happy to bring Jonathan Bornstein and Jonathan Spector into full-time USMNT roles.

On the bright side, they continue to look extremely smooth and comfortable at home when attacking, at least in those rare times the mids can push or pass the ball up the pitch. Jozy Altidore scored a goal and may be very close to passing Freddy Adu as America's next big young soccer star.

* As parity becomes more and more the norm for American sports, so it goes for world soccer. Egypt just won its second straight African Cup of Nations, and they did so with only four European based players (and the best one, Mido, missing the final). In between those two victories, Egypt did not qualify for the 2006 World Cup.

* Speaking of World Cup qualifying, the U.S.'s first opponent in 2010 qualifying is likely to be Barbados in June. The way CONCACAF World Cup qualifying works is the minnows of the region play head-to-head home-and-home, with the aggregate winners going up against the 11 best teams in the region in another knockout round (St. Vincent and Canada play each other in the second round of qualifying rather than a minnow).

That pares the field down to 12 teams, which are then split into three four-team groups for round robin play. The top two teams from each group move on to the final qualifying round, known as "The Hex." Another round robin format is played. The top three advance to the World Cup. The fourth place team plays a playoff against South America's fifth-place team.

So the US's "minnow" opponent will be the winner of the Dominica/Barbados draw. Barbados is far more accomplished of the two teams, having defeated Costa Rica and Northern Ireland in the last six years. On the other hand, Barbados could only manage a draw with Dominica in the latter's home fixture of the home-and-home contest. Either way, it's great to be gearing up for the long road to the World Cup again.

Posted by Kevin Beane at 11:46 AM | Comments (1)

February 13, 2008

Checking Out the Menu

Now that signing day and the Super Bowl have passed, football hits the deadest month of the year. Spring practice doesn't start until March, the draft doesn't happen until late April, and finally, the home stretch in the summer serves as light at the end of the tunnel.

Well, here is a sneak peak at that light.

Because I refuse to pontificate on a bunch of high school kids I have never seen play and no one has seen play on a level playing field of comparable talent, I will instead take a look at the most important non-conference matchups awaiting college football fans of the first four weekends. You know, just to wet the appetite. Because there are some nice items on the menu. And I get sadistic pleasure from teasing you with something you can't have for quite some time.

August 28

North Carolina State at South Carolina

Not a spectacular one to kick it all off. But after fasting for six months, a half-eaten burger pulled from a dumpster can taste like filet mignon. A little border rivalry adds a little spice to this rare matchup.

August 30

Alabama at Clemson

All right, now some real fun begins. Clemson returns C.J. Spiller and possibly James Davis as a two-headed monster at running back. But the Tigers constantly find ways to turn good starts into three-to-five loss seasons, remaining deeply entrenched in good-not-great land. Alabama, meanwhile, struggled in the second half of Nick Saban's first year. After a stellar (I'm told) recruiting class, the Tide needs the early momentum as badly if not more so than Clemson.

Illinois vs. Missouri

Last year, Missouri won a great 40-34 game in St. Louis with few people paying attention. That was because no one thought that the two teams would go on to lose a total of five games after that, with one going to the Rose Bowl and the other getting hosed by the BCS. Now people will go in knowing that the football extension of the "Braggin' Rights" game is the biggest game of the week. Quarterback Chase Daniels returns as a Heisman candidate for Missouri, and the dynamic Juice Williams is still the signal-caller for Illinois as both teams try to maintain momentum from surprisingly successful seasons.

USC at Virginia

USC gets its annual run at the BCS underway with an early road test for whichever new quarterback emerges between Mark Sanchez and Mitch Mustain. But while Mustain got the attention, fellow Arkansas transfer Damian Williams may have a bigger effect at wideout. The return of Rey Maualuga and Brian Cushing for senior years is huge for a defense that loses a fair amount on the D-line. But either way, Virginia might not want to look at USC's record the last five years against regular season non-conference opponents. (Hint: one of the numbers in the record is zero.)

Michigan State at Cal

Not a blockbuster, but the beginning of a number of BCS conference visitors to Pac-10 stadiums.

September 6

Tennessee at UCLA

Speaking of which, Tennessee apparently didn't get enough last year when Cal stomped out the Vols in Strawberry Canyon. The chants of "Pac-10 football" are still echoing in Berkley (mostly because there hasn't been any canceling noise since the Bears' collapse from No. 2 in the country into the Armed Forces Bowl by losing six of their last seven). Now the Vols return looking for UC blood, providing new UCLA coach Rick Neuheisel with a huge first challenge.

Miami at Florida

Yes, Randy Shannon is in the process of trying to drag Miami out of the gutter. But like Alabama, the Hurricanes landed an elite recruiting class (reportedly). And while Florida will likely stomp the 'Canes, the matchup has been the missing link between the three major Florida schools.

September 13

Ohio State at USC

This might be the highest profile game of the month. The traditional Rose Bowl foes haven't played since 1985, but their seven Rose Bowls meetings (USC has won four) make this a historic matchup. That they both happen to be regulars in the BCS certainly doesn't hurt the profile of this one.

Kansas at South Florida

This matchup, meanwhile, does not have much tradition. Or, any. Historically speaking, USC/Ohio State is to Kansas/South Florida is what a Van Goh is to a Charlie Brown comic. When USC and Ohio State last played, South Florida didn't have a football program, and Kansas barely has any more experience with winning than South Florida. But the two programs broke through with big seasons last year.

Arkansas at Texas

The old Southwest Conference rivals get re-acquainted in Austin, and these two schools don't like each other. The game may be more venomous than competitive, though, with Arkansas spiraling out of control and Texas remaining a Big 12 power.

Michigan at Notre Dame

Haha, just kidding. This one will be a blowout. Notre Dame will be better this year. But just good enough not to be as embarrassing as last year. Certainly not good enough to challenge even a rebuilding Michigan.

West Virginia at Colorado

Steve Slaton may have announced that he is entering the draft, but Bill Stewart will not be the only thing bringing continuity to the Mountaineers in the post Rich Rodriguez era. Pat White is most likely returning. Noel Devine might be more dynamic at running back than Slaton ... already. There will still be plenty of speed. Colorado makes this an intriguing pairing, as Dan Hawkins has the Buffaloes heading in the right direction. After all, they knocked off Oklahoma in last year, why not West Virginia? What, West Virginia pasted the Sooners? Aw, never mind. But Colorado is better, and also plays Florida State two weeks later in a game that would be an epic battle ... about a decade ago.

September 20

Georgia at Arizona State

One last early out-of-conference matchup puts a team that is looking for a national title at a school looking to build itself into a power and a challenger to USC for a Pac-10 title under Dennis Erickson. Arizona State made strides last year, but needs a signature win to establish itself as worthy of national attention. That might be a bit much to ask against the Bulldogs, but a good showing even in a close loss might go a long way. Remember, this was where LSU needed a miracle turnaround to win just a few years ago, and that was in the midst of the Dirk Koetter choke-a-holic era.

And with that, we are still over six months away from any of this from happening. On second thought, writing this is actually kind of painful for myself. Like Ron Burgundy, I immediately regret this decision.

Posted by Kyle Jahner at 11:56 AM | Comments (0)

Super Bowl XLII Stars of the Game

3) Mike Carey

Who is he? The referee, and a great job he did, at least from what I could tell. There weren't any blatantly terrible calls, and it seemed he remained out of sight, which is always the sign of good officiating. But his best moment? Clearly, that had to be when Bill Belichick, so nauseated by the loss, tried to end the game one second early. Carey ushered him back off the field, then made the Giants take one final snap.

Anti-climatic? Sure. But just because you won 18 games in a row doesn't mean you get to say when the game is over, even when you lose. Obey the rules, something Belichick has had problems with in the past.

What else is crazy is that Belichick has won three Super Bowls before, and his one loss came to a former coaching mate, Tom Coughlin. Why turn your unbelievably classless self into one of the main talking points after the game? Maybe LaDainian Tomlinson had it right last year, calling out Belichick and the Patriots for not knowing how to act off the field. Congrats to Carey, for making Belichick look like the truly ungracious human being he really is.

2) Steve Spagnuolo

The first-year Giants defensive coordinator has reaped plenty of credit, but it was one call I found particularly brave. The Patriots were 1st-and-10 on their own 26 with 29 seconds remaining. Tom Brady would need to march his team about 42 yards to have a 50-yard game-tying field goal, and with all three timeouts, that was certainly not impossible.

The Giants could have played it safe, gone prevent, and given the Patriots a chance. Instead, Spagnuolo gambled again, and on first down, blitzed. Brady actually had Wes Welker in single coverage open down the middle, but his pass went wayward because of the pressure the Giants were able to generate for what seemed like the 1,000th time that evening.

That is a crucial indicator of what kind of coach Spagnuolo is — a guy who goes for the win instead of trying not to lose. It will probably come back to bite him at some point, like Sean Payton in New Orleans this season. Last year, Payton was the toast of the NFL. But after his late fourth quarter flea-flicker snatched defeat from the jaws of victory earlier this season against the Buccaneers, Payton was absolutely roasted.

We in the press are a reactionary bunch. If it worked, then it must be great. If it didn't, it's a terrible call. If one of the Giants slips, and Brady isn't pressured, and hits Welker, then Spagnuolo would be roasted much in the same vein as Payton, even if it was the right call, just unfortunate execution. But what Spagnuolo gets credit for even if they lost was that he was not going to let Brady sit comfortably in the pocket — not on the first play of the first quarter, and not on the last play in the fourth.

1) David Tyree

Hands down, the greatest catch ever, ever. That catch saved the game for the Giants. If he doesn't make it, the Giants don't score, and the Patriots officially cement themselves as the most hated team of all time. Eli Manning did have to scramble out of the pocket, but on the degree of difficulty scale, Manning's scramble is more like a swan glide, like Tyree pulled off a quintuple toe loop.

He didn't even have the ball initially, then managed to somehow trap it around the back of his helmet without letting it hit the ground. This, with Rodney Harrison, one of the game's strongest safeties, draped all over him.

I have never seen a catch as good as that – not one in the same league. If that was in the regular season, it would have been amazing. In the Super Bowl, it climbs to another level. Add on top of it that it was the one thing standing between the Patriots unblemished season and the Giants' enormous upset, and it is no contest as to why that is the greatest catch of all-time.

Posted by Piet Van Leer at 11:28 AM | Comments (3)

February 12, 2008

32 Days to Selection Sunday

In lieu of a verbal highlight reel of the past week, a look at the general landscape of college hoops with barely more than a month until the madness:

THE FRESHMEN

All the hype about this year's freshman class was well-deserved. Michael Beasley has almost single-handedly elevated Kansas State to NCAA tournament lock. Derrick Rose is the starting point guard on the only undefeated team in the country. Kevin Love is the true spine of a UCLA team primed for its third consecutive Final Four run. Eric Gordon showed against an incredibly hostile Illinois crowd just how good he could be for the Hoosiers. And O.J. Mayo not only leads the Trojans in scoring, he leads the conference in minutes played. All five could well be playing in the league next year, and several of their classmates could be joining them. But that doesn't mean they all should.

Five who should go pro

Beasley; 25.2 ppg, 12.3 rpg, 56% FG, 44% 3PFG — I don't know what his wingspan in, but the words "freakish," "holy crapm" and "redonkulous" come to mind. He's got my vote as national player of the year.

Love; 17.5 ppg, 11 rpg, 61% FG — Baby Bruin could already be the Pac-10 Player of the Year. Other than getting in a little bit better shape, there's really nothing for him to gain by staying in college another year.

Mayo; 20.2 ppg, 4.4 rpg, 3.0 apg, 1.4 spg, 37% 3PFG — He's a prototypical NBA gunner in the making. Contrary to public opinion, the kid is an outstanding defender, as well.

Syracuse F Donte Greene; 17.9 ppg, 7.3 rpg, 1.2 spg, 1.9 bpg — He's actually better suited for the NBA than he is the college game.

Oklahoma F Blake Griffin; 15 ppg, 8 rpg, 59% FG — He reminds me of Carlos Boozer. (I swear I wrote that before I saw Chad Ford made the same comparison.)

Five guys who should stay in school

Kentucky F Patrick Patterson; 16.9 ppg, 7.9 rpg, 1.4 bpg, 59% FG — He's become the man for the resurgent Wildcats but might have trouble adjusting to the physicality of the NBA.

Arizona G Jerryd Bayless; 20.0 ppg, 4.4 apg, 50% FG, 45% 3PFG — I love his game, but he needs to get stronger to take the pounding he'll get driving the lane on the next level. Plus, a Bayless/Brandon Jennings backcourt next year would be the best in the conference, if not the nation.

Gordon; 21.3 ppg, 3.0 rpg, 2.5 apg, 47% FG, 41% 3PFG — He's rated as Ford's third overall prospect, but he's had some nights — Minnesota, Connecticut and Wisconsin come to mind — where he's been taken out of his game. Could he make the NBA now? Of course. But if he stayed another year, he could dominate as rookie.

Texas A&M C DeAndre Jordan; 9.0 ppg, 6.5 rpg, 65% FG — Low numbers are the result of head coach Mark Turgeon's keeping his minutes down to 21 per game. Ford's fourth-ranked prospect, Jordan has great size (7-0, 240), but only four double-digit rebounding games, none against Big 12 opposition. He needs at least one more season, preferably with a lot more minutes, to polish his game.

Florida G Nick Calathes; 15.4 ppg, 5.0 rpg, 6.2 apg, 1.5 spg — Calathes has had an outstanding freshman season by any criteria, but his low shooting percentage (41% while taking the most shots on the team) is an indication he needs to work on his shot selection before making the jump. Like the other four guys on this list, Calathes would be a lock for the first round if he came out, but he could be a lock for the top half of the lottery if he stayed.

Of those not listed and don't play for Purdue (more on that later), 15 of the best other freshmen this year: Duke F Kyle Singler, Arizona State G James Harden, Gonzaga F Austin Daye, St. Mary's G Patrick Mills, Indiana G Jordan Crawford, Vanderbilt C A.J. Ogilvy, USC F Davon Jefferson, Pittsburgh F DeJuan Blair, Syracuse G Jonny Flynn, LSU F Anthony Randolph, NC State F J.J Hickson, Mississippi G Chris Warren, Wake Forest F James Johnson, Baylor G LaceDarius Dunn, Oklahoma State G James Anderson

(With the exception of Daye and Mills, that's all players from BCS schools. Is that unfair? There are two factors at work: 1) The most talented high school seniors — those that are most ready to contribute — commit to the top programs with the most national recognition. Those programs are also able to provide more minutes because their best players are more likely to leave early to the NBA. Florida is a perfect example of that. 2) I don't get to see a lot of games from smaller conferences. In other words, I don't know what I don't know.)

THE NEW COACHES

Five having a great impact — Tubby Smith (After bolting the high-intensity world of Kentucky hoops, Smith has Minnesota at 15-7 and 5-5 in the Big Ten), Billy Gillispie (Smith's replacement at Kentucky has the Wildcats playing inspired defense and in second in the SEC East), Mark Turgeon (Gillispie's replacement at Texas A&M has Aggies at 20-4 and in line for a top-four seed), Todd Lickliter (Iowa's 11-14 overall record may not be eye-popping, but wins over Michigan State and Ohio State show the former Butler coach has the Hawkeyes moving in the right direction), Keno Davis (I'd say having the best season in the program's century-plus history can be considered "having a great impact.")

As a bonus, Brad Stevens, who took over for Lickliter at Butler, has the Bulldogs at 21-2 and 10-2 in the Horizon. With seven games remaining in the regular season, then the Horizon tournament, then the NCAA tournament, it's quite conceivable the 31-year-old Stevens could end up with more wins this season than he has years on this Earth. I don't know if that's ever happened before, but that's pretty damn impressive.

Five with some work ahead — Gregg Marshall (Wichita State is just 3-10 in the Valley), John Beilein (If it wasn't for Northwestern, Michigan would be the worst team in the Big Ten), Bob Huggins (16-7 record might not look that bad, but West Virginia is still incredibly inconsistent and downright soft at times), Jeff Bzdelik (former Air Force coach is finding life in the Big 12 a bit difficult), Rick Majerus (from the halls of ESPN to being called a heathen by St. Louis Archbishop Raymond Burke, I'd say it's been a difficult transition year for Majerus)

Don't know yet — Kansas State head coach Frank Martin (17-5, 7-1 in the Big 12) is having a fantastic year, but I'm holding back from giving too much kudos because he has two great players bequeathed from Huggins (Beasley and Bill Walker), so it's almost like he's just not screwing up. Maybe that's not fair, but I want to see if he can maintain the success.

Of the other main coaches who took head new head jobs this past offseason, former Wake Forest assistant Dino Gaudio has done a fantastic job holding Wake together after the death of Skip Prosser last summer, new Arkansas coach John Pelphrey (from South Alabama) has the Hogs on the precipice of another NCAA tournament and former Iowa coach Steve Alford started off great at New Mexico (14-2), but the Lobos have struggled in the Mountain West and are now in a tie for fourth at 5-4 in conference.

A-10 VS. MVC

Going into the year, you could see a change in momentum for each of these conferences. The A-10, with senior-dominated squads like Xavier, Dayton, and Rhode Island, was going to make a push as the top non-BCS conference. The Valley, having suffered massive defections from the past few years, was going to have to rebuild.

To a certain extent, that story line has held true. Though Dayton has fallen off with injuries to Charles Little and Chris Wright and is just 4-5 in conference play, Rhode Island and Xavier are a combined 40-8. Chances are pretty good both make the bracket, though both could also very easily get knocked out in the first round (URI in particular). 15-7 St. Joseph's just beat Villanova last week, 14-8 Charlotte has beaten Wake Forest, Davidson, Clemson, and Southern Illinois, and Dayton, despite its struggles in conference, has wins over Louisville (on the road) and Pittsburgh to bolster its resume.

The Valley, on the other hand, has seen Southern Illinois, its flagship program over the past half-decade, collapse after the graduations of Jamaal Tatum and Tony Young. At just 12-12 overall and 7-6 in the MVC, the Salukis are well into auto-bid-or-bust territory. Dana Altman and Jim Les went through some growing pains at Creighton and Bradley, respectively, and Missouri State, for a few years the Presidents of the Selection Sunday Snub Club, is in full free-fall. (I'm afraid the loquacious Barry Hinson might be in his final days in Springfield. If only the Selection Committee hadn't screwed him over the past two years...)

But whether all that translates to a difference in NCAA tournament bids is another matter. Xavier is in. So is Drake, who has yet to remember they should stink. 1-1.

Rhode Island is 20-4, 6-3 in the A-10 and carries a very good RPI of 24. They have a really good non-conference win at Syracuse and have avoided the crushing loss, the worst being at St. Louis (RPI of 102), which really isn't that bad. With three top-50 teams coming to Kingston in a row next week (Xavier, UMass, and St. Joe's), the Rams should be able to clinch a berth prior to heading for Atlantic City for the A-10 tourney. 2-1 Atlantic 10.

Illinois State has a good record at 17-7 (16-7 against D-I) and 9-4 in conference. The RPI isn't particularly strong at 49, and they have a bad loss to Eastern Michigan (RPI 236) hanging around their necks. They missed a shot to defeat Drake (RPI of 6) at home last week and don't have any more big opportunities on their regular-season schedule (Creighton with an RPI of 50 is the best). The question is whether the Selection Committee will overlook the weak computer profile and respect the Valley enough to put through the second-best team strictly because they're the second-best team. I'm betting they do, with the caveat the Redbirds really need to win at least five of their remaining six games in the regular season and avoid an early loss in the MVC tournament. For now, they're in. 2-2.

Then it gets dicey. St. Joseph's is next in line on the A-10 tote board at 15-7. They swept Massachusetts (RPI of 26) and have a semi-decent RPI at 41, but losses to Holy Cross (137) at home and Duquesne (93) on the road won't help their cause. Right now, I'd say they're out, but they do have trips to Rhode Island (Feb. 24) and Dayton (March 8), plus a home date against Xavier (March 6) in order to put themselves back on the right side of the bubble. Temple and Charlotte are next in the standings at 5-3. Temple is only 12-10 with an RPI of 69 and loss to Charlestown and Richmond. No go. Charlotte has the aforementioned nice wins, but horrible losses to Monmouth (298) and Hofstra (253). They would have to damn near run the table and lose in the A-10 title game in order to overcome those for an at-large bid. I'm not holding my breath.

Let's see, who else? After Xavier, Rhode Island, Temple, and Charlotte, it's Massachusetts and Dayton. Wait, actually, it's Duquesne and Richmond at 5-4 before we finally get to the Flyers and Minutemen at 4-5 (along with St. Louis and La Salle). First, Duquesne and Richmond have no shot. None. Second, what the hell does the Selection Committee do with Dayton and UMass with RPIs of 16 and 26, respectively?

On the one hand, Dayton should get some slack for the injuries. 16-6 is still a very good record, and they do have those wins over two of the Big East's best in Louisville and Pittsburgh. On the other hand, they just lost to George Washington (226) and are below .500 in the seventh ranked conference in the country. Massachusetts is in even worse position having lost four of their past six, no injuries as excuses and five of their remaining six opponents have an RPI in the sub-100 range, including Fordham at 181, St. Bonaventure at 249, and GW at 226.

Bottom line for the A-10: if you want a third bid, pray for Dayton to make a run.

Back to the MVC, Creighton, at 16-6, is the conference's only shot at a third at-large, and it's a long shot at best. The Bluejays have a not-great RPI of 50, an unimpressive 148 non-conference strength of schedule, and their only win over an RPI Top 50 team was a home victory in overtime over St. Joe's in December. With four of their final six regular season games on the road, including a Bracketbusters trip to Oral Roberts, the Jays are going to have to work for it.

In the final estimation, I'm guessing it's going to be three each: Xavier, Rhode Island, and Dayton from the A-10, Drake, Illinois State, and Creighton from the Valley. Dayton and Creighton are the picks to win the conference tournaments. Possible spoilers: Duquesne in the A-10 and SIU in the Valley.

THE BRACKETBUSTERS EFFECT

Creighton didn't really get a whole lot of help with the road trip to Oral Roberts. It'll be a good win if they win, but not as good as a loss would be bad. That's not to disrespect Oral Roberts, which is extremely solid at 17-5 and undefeated at 12-0 in the newly-formed Summit League. But beating ORU isn't going to push the committee into including Creighton. A loss and it might be lights out without the MVC auto bid (which they've taken six out of the past nine seasons, so there's a good shot).

On the whole, the Bracketbusters series won't pack the same intrigue as last year. Drake/Butler is the marquis matchup, but we know both are likely going to the tournament, so it's more a battle for seeding than survival. Survival is more fun. On the flip side, Southern Illinois/Nevada would have been a great game last year. This year, both teams are in fifth place in their respective conferences. Likewise, Bucknell/Old Dominion and Davidson/Winthrop would have been a lot more fun last year. (Though Davidson/Winthrop should still be entertaining and is part of the Friday night TV package, so that's good. Any time you can watch Stephen Curry and Jason Richards play, you should take it.)

That's not to say there won't be some quality action. The top five games to watch out for (not including Drake/Butler and Creighton/Oral Roberts, which should be great games, previous commentary not withstanding):

VCU (18-5 overall, 11-2 Colonial) at Akron (17-6, 7-3 MAC)
Kent State (19-5, 8-2 MAC) at St. Mary's (20-3, 7-1 West Coast)
Wright State (17-6, 9-4 Horizon) at Illinois State (17-7, 9-4 Missouri Valley)
Siena (16-8, 11-3 MAAC) at Boise State (17-6, 8-3 WAC)
George Mason (17-7, 9-4 Colonial) at Ohio (16-7, 7-3 MAC)

PURDUE

Leading scorer: E'Twaun Moore, freshman
Second leading scorer: Robbie Hummel, freshman
Third leading scorer: Keaton Grant, sophomore
Fourth leading scorer: Scott Martin, freshman

Leading rebounder: Hummel
Leading assist man: Hummel
Best shooter: Hummel

Record: 19-5 and 10-1 in the Big Ten

I know what Keno Davis has done at Drake is remarkable. Duke is having an incredible season under Coach K. Likewise Georgetown under John Thompson III, UCLA under Ben Howland, Stanford under Trent Johnson, Tennessee under Bruce Pearl, Indiana under Kelvin Sampson, Saint Mary's under Randy Bennett, and Memphis under John Calipari.

But for Purdue coach Matt Painter to sit at 10-1 in the Big Ten, with a sweep of Bo Ryan and Wisconsin in his pocket, with three freshmen and a sophomore as his top four scorers, that's your national coach of the year.

THE FIELD

There's obviously a lot of ball to be played, but you can't have a snapshot column without taking a shot at the field. I don't mess with seedings until the final call. It may be a fun exercise, but it's really just a crapshoot.

SEC (7*): Arkansas, Florida, Tennessee, Vanderbilt, Mississippi, Mississippi State, Arkansas
Big East (7): Georgetown, Syracuse, Connecticut, Marquette, Louisville, Notre Dame, Pittsburgh
Pac-10 (5): UCLA, Washington State, Arizona, USC, Stanford
Big 12 (5): Kansas, Kansas State, Texas, Texas A&M, Baylor
Big Ten (5): Indiana, Ohio State, Michigan State, Purdue, Wisconsin
ACC (4**): North Carolina, Duke, Maryland, Clemson
A-10 (3): Xavier, Rhode Island, Dayton
MVC (3): Drake, Creighton, Illinois State
WCC (2): Gonzaga, St. Mary's
Conference USA (2): Memphis, Houston
Mountain West (2): BYU, UNLV
America East (1): Maryland-Baltimore County
A-Sun (1): Belmont
Big Sky (1): Northern Arizona (I know Portland State is in first and swept NAU this season, but I still think the Lumberjacks are pulling out the auto bid)
Big South (1): UNC-Ashville
Big West (1): Pacific
Colonial (1): VCU
Horizon (1): Butler
Ivy (1): Cornell
Metro Atlantic (1): Rider
MAC (1): Kent State (A 12/5er — I can smell it)
MEAC (1): Morgan State
Northeast (1): Robert Morris (Sacred Heart has a half-game lead, but I'm sticking with the Colonials)
Ohio Valley (1): Austin Peay
Patriot (1): American (though I'm still hoping Bucknell can pull it out)
Southern (1): Davidson
Southland (1): Stephen F. Austin
SWAC (1): Alabama State
Summit (1): Oral Roberts (though very well could be IUPUI; I'd like to see them play during Championship Week)
Sun Belt (1): South Alabama (Feb. 16 trip to Western Kentucky is a huge game for the Jaguars; A win and trip to at least the conference title game, and South Alabama, with an RPI of 34 and a win over SEC-West leading Mississippi State in their pocket, could be looking at a possible at-large. It's a long shot, but it's not completely out of the question.)
WAC (1): Utah State

* I can't put in Kentucky just yet, but they'll work their way in before it's said and done. It'll be controversial, and a team with a better record will get snubbed to make room for the Cats, but that happens every year. It happened with Arkansas last year and it'll happen with Kentucky this year.

** NC State gets in if they take at least one against Duke or UNC at home.

Top Five Double-Digit Seeds to Fear — South Alabama or Western Kentucky out of the Sun Belt, Oral Roberts or IUPUI out of the Summit, Davidson, Kent State, and VCU

Final Four — No change from the early season call: Tennessee, Memphis, UCLA, and Indiana

Champion — Memphis

I'm sticking with the Tigers, but I have concerns about their free throw shooting. As I mentioned a few weeks ago, their 58 percent shooting from the free-throw line would be by far the worst of a champion in quite some time. At some point, they're going to be in a tight game with the season on the line. No champion finishes the season blowing everybody out. Will they be able to make the shots when they really need them?

Seth Doria is a writer based out of St. Louis. For the only daily column that mixes sports, politics, and entertainment news in one, visit The Left Calf.

Posted by Joshua Duffy at 12:23 PM | Comments (0)

Bjorn Borg, My Hero

Anyone who knows me will tell you that I am obsessed with the history of the game of tennis. I am especially fascinated by little-known facts that are overlooked by most publications yet carry that little interesting anecdote that will make one say, "Wow, that's odd!" Some of these will not interest the casual fan, but for those who follow the game closely, it will make a delightful addition to tennis-related conversations around the clubhouse.

Chances are some people may not even believe you and will play the "downer" role better than Eeyore from Winnie the Pooh. They will throw the "why should we believe you?" question. Chances are they are the ultimate phantom-storytellers themselves and are jealous that their stories are from an another universe, while yours seem to be backed by names, dates, and facts. Never mind them, enjoy telling these lovely anecdotes. In fact, contact me and tell your true tales related to the history of tennis, I promise that I will be all ears!

So here are four entertaining anecdotes and stories that should keep you the center of attention in clubhouse discussions and make your after-match drink with your friends all that more joyful. I will limit them to anecdotes that are related to Bjorn Borg, since he is a name that should be know by most casual or serious tennis fans.

***

The year is 1980. Another thrilling John McEnroe vs. Bjorn Borg encounter. This one is in Madison Square Garden during the year-ending Masters Championships. These two formidable players are thrown in the same group, so fans hope that they end up number one and two in the group in order to reach semifinals and hopefully meet again in the finals. Gene Mayer, with his magical two-handed shots a-la Fabrice Santoro, muddies the waters by beating McEnroe the day before. Now McEnroe must beat Borg to stay alive, and all of a sudden, the group match has taken the atmosphere of the finals.

Borg wins the first set, the second set goes to a tiebreaker. At 3-all in the tiebreaker, Borg is not happy with line call that puts him down 4-3. He walks up to the referee and starts arguing politely, only the way Borg could. The crowd is stunned. Has Borg, the iceman who never says a word or flinches his eyebrow, lost his mind? He is not supposed to do such thing. Things take even a stranger turn. Borg is penalized for a delay of game, the referee announces "warning," then a little later awards a point to McEnroe. It's now 5-3 in the tiebreaker.

Surely, this is an illusion! Nope, it's not. Borg is not moving from the chair. Another point penalty and now it's 6-3, resulting in three set points for McEnroe. Borg finally walks back to play the next point, loses the point, and the set goes to McEnroe. Keep in mind that the point penalty system for delay of game has just gone into effect recently. And out of all players, Bjorn Borg is the first victim. What were the odds for that?

In the first game of the third set, McEnroe nails a return to the crowd to give the point to Borg. A gentleman-like gesture from McEnroe? Now the crowd is thinking that McEnroe has lost his mind. For perhaps 10 minutes, we were transported to a Star Trek alternate universe. Who knows? Forty minutes later, Borg still wins the third set in another tiebreaker to take McEnroe out of the competition. Only Borg could remain cool enough after the incident to still display his mechanical tennis and pull out the victory against the genius of McEnroe. Thrilling match, strange happenings, all in one evening with McEnroe and Borg.

***

The year is 1981. Borg is playing the Martini Open of Geneva. Unknown at the time, he will announce his plans for retirement a few months later. Less than a year later, another Swede named Mats Wilander will win Roland Garros and the big question by all experts will be "who would have won if they played each other on clay?" Amazingly, just about every publication, every tennis expert in the media overlooks the fact that only several months earlier, Borg played Wilander in the round of 32 in the Martini Open and schooled him with a 6-1, 6-1 victory.

When asked the specific question, Borg is too classy to mention it, and Wilander is too busy discrediting the comparison that he is not "the second Borg, but the first Wilander." The Internet did not exist for the casual curious observer to search it, and few years later with Borg long gone and Wilander rivaling Ivan Lendl, Jimmy Connors, and McEnroe, the subject is all forgotten. Now this crushing and meaningful victory of Borg is nothing but data on the ATP website.

Let's remain with the same Martini Open in Geneva. Borg plays Tomas Smid in the finals. He is winning handily. In the second set, with a 3-2 lead, Borg is perturbed by what seems to be a bad call. Unlike the Madison Square Garden experience, he remains quiet and cool. He just stares at the referee for 10 seconds, melting him on his chair. He moves on and literally throws the game away with three straight shots well close to the back walls of the court. The crowd is ooh-ing and aah-ing. Yes, let it be known that even the legend Borg, the definition of concentration and professionalism during his tennis career, indeed threw a game away.

At 3-all, he is all business again, he wins three straight games and closes the match out 6-4, 6-3. It was his last title on the pro tour. Maybe that game being thrown away was a sign that Borg was no longer seeing tennis the same way, and he was about to throw in the towel. Later in the locker room, one of the tournament organizers, a good friend of mine, asks him about that game. Borg replies that it was "okay" because he would have had to change sides only one more time the rest of the match whether he won that game or not. Oh, the humiliation for Tomas Smid!

***

The year is 1981 again. A teenager boy, wearing the same Fila outfit that Bjorn Borg made famous, approaches him nervously. He has prepared this nice collage of Borg pictures on a blank paper the previous day in his bedroom. All his hopes rest on the fact that Borg may be impressed by it and give him an autograph on the collage. He knows it's a tough task, because Borg is always circled by bodyguards and photographers coming in and out of his practice sessions or matches.

As Borg is making his way to the clubhouse fresh from a grueling two-hour practice session (following a match, mind you), nobody dares to approach him, looking from a distance. The rash young boy says to himself, "It's now or never!" He quickly walks up to him, shows him the collage and hands the pen to him saying "Mr. Borg, please!" with honest, but shy puppy eyes.

Borg stops his walk, looks at the collage, smiles and says, "You made this?" The boy is about to swallow his tongue, just nods. Borg signs the collage and says, "I should get your autograph for preparing this," pats him on the shoulder and keeps walking. The boy can't believe it, Borg is now his hero forever and ever! Others in the crowd see this encounter, try their luck, but it's too late. His entourage has moved in, Borg quickens his pace and disappears into the locker rooms. A glorious encounter for the boy.

That same boy, now fresh into his 40s, still keeps the collage to this day, framed nicely!

Posted by Mert Ertunga at 11:09 AM | Comments (3)

February 11, 2008

The Patriots and a Lesson in NFL History

Say all you want about the New England Patriots and their stunning loss in Super Bowl XLII; they still deserve a tip of the hat for what they accomplished during the season, and in the postseason for that matter. And say what you want about Bill Belichick, whether you think he's a cheater or not — the man knows how to get a group of guys to play together every week to the best of their ability and achieve success. And for 18 straight weeks, the Pats were successful. Had it not been for one miraculous escape, and equally miraculous catch and a wrong guess on pass coverage, and the Patriots would have joined the 1972 Dolphins as the only undefeated champions in league history.

But enough about that game. We all watched, we all either cried tears of joy for the Giants or tears of lament for the Patriots, we all gasped in awe at David Tyree's catch that kept the winning drive alive. What we might not have done, though, is understood how monumental a season New England really had in the annals of pro football.

If you've watched the NFL for longer than a couple weeks, you probably are familiar with the story of the '72 Miami Dolphins, the league's only perfect team. But did you know that they weren't the only team in NFL history to have an unbeaten season? Or that they were not the first team in pro football to have a perfect season? Well, then, it's time for Football History 101 — The Lossless Teams.

When thumbing through the dusty archives of the National Football League, not counting the Dolphins, there have been six teams that finished the regular season without losing a game. In the early years of the league, before the powers decided a playoff was the way to go (hello, NCAA? sorry, I digress), four teams ended the season with a goose egg in the "L" column, but none of them were quite perfect. In the very first installment of the league, when it was called the American Professional Football Association, the Akron Pros finished the year with an 8-0-3 record. That was 1920. Two years later, when the league was renamed, the Canton Bulldogs claimed the title with a 10-0-2 record. The next season, 1923, Canton would again finish the year without a loss at 11-0-1. Between the last game of the 1921 season and their next loss — the third game in 1925 (the team was inactive in 1924) — the Bulldogs avoided losing in 27 consecutive games. Then, the last team to end the year without a loss prior to the divisional split was the 1929 Green Bay Packers at 12-0-1.

When the NFL saw the benefit of a championship game after its 1932 season, when the Chicago Bears and Portsmouth Spartans played a game indoors at Chicago Stadium under modified rules, it decided to split into two divisions, have a uniform schedule, and a regular title game; and thus, the modern NFL was born. It didn't take long before the league would see its first unbeaten and untied team.

The 1934 Bears were loaded with talent. Aside from the Father of Modern Football, George Halas, at the helm, the team would boast six future Hall of Fame players, including Red Grange and Bronko Nagurski. Beattie Feathers would become the league's first 1,000-yard rusher when he galloped for 1,004 yards (despite the previously mentioned backfield mates), and the league's leading scorer was Bear back/kicker Jack Manders. That talent screamed through the rest of the league, posting three shutouts and holding opponents to less than 10 points in 10 of its 13 games. Their championship game opponent, the New York Giants, lost 27-7 and 10-9 to the Bears in their two regular season meetings. But as it is said, the third time's a charm, and the Giants handled Chicago — minus an injured Feathers — easily in the title game 30-13, the first of several "sneaker" games (the Giants had an advantage over the Bears in the second half by wearing sneakers on the icy field).

One other NFL team would finish the regular season unbeaten, but lose in the championship game. Again, it was the Chicago Bears, this time in 1942. This installment of the Monsters of the Midway was very similar to the '34 team in that it had five future Hall of Fame players, including Sid Luckman, Bulldog Turner, and Joe Stydahar, and lineman George Musso, who was on the Bears' previous unbeaten team. And with "Papa Bear" Halas still on the sidelines, the team notched four shutouts and held teams to less than 10 points in eight of its 11 games. But, as was the case eight years earlier, the Bears would not realize the dream of a perfect season. In the championship game, the Washington Redskins would dash Chicago's hopes, 14-6. The teams did not play during the regular season, which may have accounted somewhat to the Redskins' upset.

That would be it until the 1972 season when Miami would go 17-0 and claim the league's only "perfect" season. But they weren't the first team to see perfection in a pro football season.

The first was the 1937 Los Angeles Bulldogs of the second American Football League. The league did not have a playoff, nor a symmetrical schedule, and the season ended with L.A. Sporting a 9-0 record. The other occurred in one of the NFL's "legacy" leagues, the All-America Football Conference, or AAFC.

The Cleveland Browns of 1948 were a very good football team. With five future NFL Hall of Famers in the fold, the Browns dominated the league. In a 14-game schedule, just five games were decided by less than 10 points. The championship game was a joke, with Cleveland whipping a hapless Buffalo Bills team, 49-7. With that, the Browns became the first pro football team to finish the regular season undefeated and win out in the post-season. Twenty-four years later, after the AAFC was but a distant memory in the minds of football fans, the NFL would see it's only team to match that feat.

With all that in mind, while some may say the Patriots' loss in the Super Bowl proved that they weren't "all that" this season, and that until all the members of the '72 Dolphins have gone the way of the AAFC no team will ever be perfect, what they accomplished is still remarkable. And, not to take anything away from Bob Griese, Larry Csonka, Jim Kiick, Paul Warfield, and company, the Patriots actually did have a better season than Miami did 35 years ago. New England went 18-0 this year before its Super Bowl loss; the Dolphins were 17-0 including the postseason. Plus, the Dolphins, counting the last game of 1971 and the first game of 1973, had a 16-0 regular season record between losses. With New England's three wins in a row to end the 2006 season, they're now at a streak of 19 consecutive regular season wins, and that number could grow next season.

So, let the debate continue. Who was better? Which team will be remembered in the annals of pro football as being the more dominant team? Are you old school, or new school? Griese or Brady? Warfield or Moss? Scott or Harrison? Even if the Pats had beaten the Giants, would we all be convinced they were better than Miami or Cleveland? Think about it.

Class dismissed.

Posted by Adam Russell at 11:42 AM | Comments (1)

MLB Ownership Given Pass By Feds

Major League Baseball and drugs. The two have been linked for decades and their relationship has never waned. The drug ingredients are different, the players acquiring them have changed, and the performance benefits have been enhanced.

But MLB has not learned much in the past couple of decades when it comes to the integrity of the game, in obeying the law and in protecting the best interests of its athletes, its most precious commodity.

In 1985, Pittsburgh U.S. Attorney, J. Alan Johnson implicated 19 MLB players for possession of and use of cocaine. Then-MLB Commissioner Peter Ueberroth imposed penalties on 11 of the 19, while none were criminally prosecuted. Similar to the BALCO case and to the recent Mitchell Report, the depth of the problem among athletes using cocaine or illegal drugs made for sensational headlines.

But the way in which the drug culture was arguably enabled by MLB and its subsequent punishments were laughable and was perhaps the precursor to the abuse of steroids and HGH in the 1990s and into the 21st century.

Although it was documented at the time that at least 40% of MLB players were recreationally using cocaine in the '80s, only a handful were punished. But such star players such as Keith Hernandez, Dave Parker, and Lonnie Smith were punished not by the federal government, but by MLB. They were required to perform 100 hours of community service and to avail themselves to drug testing. Four other players were suspended for 60 days. Since the drug dealers were nabbed by the feds, MLB was off the hook and essentially did what it felt was appropriate for the "good of the game."

Fast-forward to 2003 when grand jury testimony was taken in the federal BALCO investigation involving MLB's Jason Giambi, Barry Bonds, Gary Sheffield, Benito Santiago, Olympic medalist Marion Jones, and NFL star Bill Romanowski, to name but a few of the few implicated. Again, only a handful of athletes from the entire professional athletic world were threatened and eventually given immunity, in order to take down BALCO President Vic Conte, personal trainer Greg Anderson, and the illicit sale, distribution, and administration of illegal performance-enhancing substances.

Marion Jones will serve six months in prison neither for buying and illegally using controlled substances nor for her check fraud to the tune of $200,000, but for lying under oath to a federal grand jury about the use of drugs. Ditto for Barry Bonds. His scheduled perjury trial is to be held in April 2008.

The latest fiasco with "personal trainer" Brian McNamee, former NY Mets clubhouse employee Kirk Radomski, and MLB stars Roger Clemens and Andy Pettitte following former Senator George Mitchell's report on behalf of MLB is but another failed attempt at exposing the so-called truth.

But truth has been absent from baseball for a very long time. Moreover, implicating only 30 active players for a grand total of 89 for using performance enhancing drugs over the past decade is not only laughable, but terribly sad. Given the resources and legal expenses tallied around $20‒30 million and paid to George Mitchell's law firm by MLB, the Mitchell Report's omissions should raise as many eyebrows as its contents.

But more importantly is the absence of a cry for accountability from MLB by the federal government in essentially allowing it to be in the drug business. For its owners and its teams' staff members not to admit any wrong doing is beyond arrogance. A lack of efforts to look into those areas in which there was first-hand knowledge of possible illicit drug use or non-credentialed employees working in the area of strength training was but blind neglect.

To wit, according to the Mitchell Report, San Francisco Giants General Manager Brian Sabean was alerted by the Giants' staff athletic trainer Stan Conte that a player had asked him about whether he should buy steroids from Bonds' personal trainer, Greg Anderson, as far back as 2002. Additionally, the Giants' longtime equipment manager Mike Murphy found syringes in the locker of catcher Benito Santiago.

Conte said he reported both incidents to Sabean immediately. Sabean told Conte that if he had a problem with Bonds' trainer, he should handle it himself. But it was obvious to Conte that it was not his place to confront Barry Bonds. And apparently no one else in the Giants organization felt it was their place either, as per their MLB obligation to report illicit drug use.

Brian Sabean stated in the Mitchell Report that he "was unaware of the obligation to report drug use to the Commissioner's Office." Former Mets General Manager Steve Phillips and Kirk Radomski's employer also plead ignorance on reporting illicit drug use to the Commissioner's Office. Ironically now, Phillips is paid by ESPN to analyze and to inform the public about MLB's policies.

Greg Anderson was given full accessibility to the Giants' clubhouse. Stan Conte did not believe it was proper, let alone legal. But in order to placate Bonds, the Giants also accorded him two additional trainers, Harvey Shields and Greg Oliver. All three traveled with the team. In fact, Oliver and Shields were added to the Giants' payroll to account for their presence in the clubhouse, whereby they could advise other players as well.

Peter Magowan, CEO and Managing Partner of the San Francisco Giants, asked Sabean whether the Giants "had a problem" with regard to steroids after reading the news concerning the BALCO case and Greg Anderson, according to the Mitchell Report. But Sabean told Mitchell he did not recall that conversation.

The issue was not only that of illicit drugs permeating the Giants' locker room, but the issue of personal trainers such as Greg Anderson giving out advice about steroids. None of Bonds' trainers were certified to give out that advice nor licensed to either dispense of or speak about drug administration. Their certifications and schooling as personal trainers is also in question.

The lack of background checks on supposed strength coaches and personal trainers was rampant in MLB until 2004 when MLB limited access to clubhouses by personal trainers and ancillary clubhouse personnel not on the payroll. Due to the BALCO case, MLB did it more for security reasons, as the vetting of a trainer's certification and background still has many lapses, to say the least.

In 2004, Sandy Krum, former assistant athletic trainer for the Chicago Cubs, was terminated, he believes, for informing Cubs' General Manager Jim Hendry that head athletic trainer Dave Groeschner was operating without an Illinois state required license. Unlike a personal trainer, an athletic trainer works under the auspices of a medical doctor and 43 states require such a license.

Additionally, athletic trainers are not authorized in Illinois or NY to give injections to players. Coincidentally, Groeschner followed Cubs Manager Dusty Baker from San Francisco. In 2005, the Cubs fired Groeschner. Dusty is now with the Cincinnati Reds.

We have heard ad nauseum about the McNamee/Clemens soap opera which will be played out before the Congressional House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on February 13, 2008. But little light has been shed upon the underlying facts about how McNamee helped weave his own web, in which the Toronto Blue Jays and the NY Yankees play no small part.

McNamee earned an undergraduate degree from St. John's University in NY where he played on the baseball team as a catcher, but did not have enough talent for MLB. He then followed his father's lead and joined the NYPD in 1990. He was an officer for three years, serving two years undercover and then quit the force. He was suspended for 30 days at the end of his service for allowing a prisoner to escape from custody, but said he took the fall for someone else.

Former St. John's schoolmate Tim McCleary was the assistant General Manager of the Yankees in 1993 and hired McNamee as the bullpen catcher, where he stayed until 1995. McNamee then decided to get into personal training. In 1998, McCleary was hired by Toronto, and he then hired McNamee as a strength coach and where he met Roger Clemens. He also befriended Jose Canseco who at the time was also a Blue Jay.

After Clemens was traded to NY in 1999, McNamee joined him in 2000 when the Yankees put him on the payroll as a strength coach as well, until 2001, when allegations emerged of rape and illegally giving the involved woman GHB — the date-rape drug — a nearly fatal dose.

Charges were not filed as the woman did not want to pursue them supposedly because she was having an affair with one of the Yankees' married players. But McNamee was spotted having sex with a nearly comatose woman in the one of the team's hotel pools on the night of a Devil Rays game in St. Petersburg in October of 2001. His account to police was filled with inconsistencies, including denying he was the man in the pool when spotted by security and another Yankee staffer. Again, McNamee was the victim.

GHB is illegally used by athletes to recover from strenuous workouts and was also part of McNamee's medicine cabinet. Even so, Clemens gave McNamee the benefit of the doubt about the alleged rape. The Yankees, however, let McNamee go before the 2002 season without disclosing the reason. But Clemens hired him as his personal trainer and employed him through June 2007. Andy Pettitte also paid McNamee for his training services during that time.

McNamee's credentials were never checked by either the Toronto Blue Jays or the NY Yankees. During their employ of his services he was never a certified strength coach. He may have been a personal trainer, but certification is not legally required to be a personal trainer, although such certification only requires an exam and no course work or field training.

McNamee's credentials are dubious at best, not to mention his phony PhD that he acquired in 2000 from an implicated internet diploma mill known as Columbus University, supposedly located in Louisiana, and since sold off to another entity in another state due to its being nailed by authorities.

McNamee was advertising himself on the Internet as Dr. McNamee, PhD in order to market his In-Vite nutritional supplements and his strength training services. He was also getting involved in other enterprises which Clemens was helping to bankroll to help out his career. Although McNamee made claims he was certified, he was not certified as a strength coach until nearly 2006.

Dr. Jeff Falkel, Chairman of the Executive Council Certification Commission of the National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA), who was recently on Will Carroll's BaseballProspectus.com radio show, stated that McNamee did not even take his Certified Strength Conditioning Specialist exam until October 2005.

And unbelievably, MLB does not require certifications of its personal trainers or strength coaches, but does require its staff athletic trainers be licensed only as required by law. The NFL, NBA, NHL, and NCAA are also lax about certifications other than athletic trainers who work with medical physicians. They still do not require that their strength trainers be credentialed by the NSCA.

What we can conclude from this unveiling of the lack of professionalism and clubhouse culture throughout MLB is that without the cooperation of all of its participants, from the executive level on down to the groundskeepers, it cannot be trusted to police itself, based upon its putrid record thus far. And the business decisions made on the executive level from Commissioner to owner to GM to player to staff employees has been dismal and in disrepair.

Ultimately, greed has been the prevailing culprit, influencing both owners and players alike. But to single out a few superstars will never cure baseball or professional sports of its ills. It is shortsighted by MLB and not surprisingly so by our U.S. Congress. While there is no ready solution, using some common sense might be a good start.

Posted by Diane M. Grassi at 11:02 AM | Comments (0)

February 8, 2008

The NFL's Greatest Dynasties

Three years ago, after the New England Patriots won their third Super Bowl in four years, I wrote a column called The Definition of Dynasty, in which I examined the greatest sustained success any major professional football team had ever experienced. After a great deal of research and consideration, I named seven teams that I thought could justly be considered dynasties. The Patriots were not one of them.

Even though New England lost Super Bowl XLII, it should not surprise you that my opinion on this matter has now changed. When I wrote that first piece, the Bill Belichick/Tom Brady version of the Patriots only had three or four good seasons to their name. I have as much respect for three titles as the next guy, but don't dynasties make the playoffs more than three times? It just hadn't lasted long enough for me to compare Brady and Belichick to Bart Starr and Vince Lombardi. Now, though, New England has seven straight seasons with a winning record, including six playoff appearances, six division titles, an undefeated regular season, and three Super Bowls. Anyone who doesn't consider that a football dynasty doesn't believe in dynasties.

What I'm going to do here is look at 15 dynastic teams — I used 32 last time — and try to sort them out, eventually ranking all 15, and trying to find an appropriate cutoff for what is and is not a dynasty. Before I get to that, though, let me address a rising team that may one day belong on this list: the Tony Dungy Colts. They weren't included in the original article, but since Dungy took over as coach, Indianapolis has won at least 10 games every year (overall winning percentage of .760), captured five straight division titles, started a season 13-0, won a Super Bowl, and witnessed record-breaking seasons from Marvin Harrison (143 receptions in 2002) and Peyton Manning (49 TDs and a 121.1 passer rating in 2004). Is this a dynasty? With only one Super Bowl so far, it is obviously not. If the Colts win another championship or two, though, that could change.

These are the 15 teams I'll be examining, and eventually ranking:

The Mel Hein Giants (1933-1941)
70-30-6, .689 regular-season winning percentage, 2 NFL Championships

The Giants played in six of the first nine NFL Championship Games. During this time, they were .689 in the regular season, which equates to 11-5 in a 16-game season, and outscored their opponents by over 550 points, 1545-987. The 1930s Giants were loaded with future Hall of Famers — head coach Steve Owen, receiver Red Badgro, fullbacks Tuffy Leemans and Ken Strong, and tackle Cal Hubbard — but none was more impressive than Mel Hein. A center on offense and a linebacker on defense, Hein was named first-team all-NFL every year from 1933 to 1940, and was one of 11 players elected to the Hall of Fame's inaugural class in 1963. Most famously, Hein was named NFL MVP in 1938, the only offensive linemen ever to win that award. Although Hein and the Giants only won two championships (in 1934 and '38), they were a perpetual contender, a fixture in the championship game, and a favorite almost every time they took the field. That's what a dynasty is.

The Sid Luckman Bears (1933-1943)
98-23-5, .782 regular-season winning percentage, 4 NFL Championships

The Bears had only one losing season from 1930-1951, and this 11-year period was the team at its best. Hall of Famers who passed through Chicago during these years included head coach George Halas, quarterback Sid Luckman, legendary fullback Bronko Nagurski, do-everything back George McAfee, center Bulldog Turner, guards Danny Fortmann and Walt Kiesling, tackles George Musso and Joe Stydahar, defensive tackle Link Lyman, defensive end Bill Hewitt, and in 1933 and '34, Red Grange. I've named this group after Luckman, even though he didn't enter the league until 1939, because he brought a new level of dominance to Chicago, guiding the team to a truly absurd 45-8-1 (.843) record and three NFL Championships from 1939-43. During these 11 seasons, the Bears made seven championship appearances and won four titles, including a 73-0 victory in the 1940 NFL Championship Game, and undefeated regular seasons in 1934 (13-0) and 1942 (11-0), outscoring their opponents by a total of 2839-1313.

The Don Hutson Packers (1936-1944)
73-21-4, .765 regular-season winning percentage, 3 NFL Championships

The Packers and Bears are the most storied rivalry in the NFL. From 1936 through 1944, no other team won the NFL's Western Division. In 1936, the Bears went 9-3 but didn't qualify for the postseason because Green Bay was 10-1-1. The next season the Packers outscored their opponents almost 2-to-1 but missed out because the Bears had gone 9-1-1. So it went for nine seasons. The most hotly contested season was 1941, when both teams finished 10-1, with the losses coming against each other. The Bears won a playoff — the first non-championship postseason game in NFL history — and went on to crush the Giants 37-9 in the official title game.

Green Bay's .765 winning percentage is equivalent to averaging more than 12 wins per year, in a 16-game season, for nine years — a feat no team has accomplished in the Super Bowl era. Over this period, the Packers outscored their opponents 2222-1314. The man most responsible for this was Don Hutson, the only receiver with a decent argument to be ranked ahead of Jerry Rice on an all-time list. Hutson led the NFL in receptions eight times, in receiving yards seven times, and in receiving touchdowns nine times. He was also a good defensive back with 30 career interceptions, and a kicker who added 172 extra points to his 105 career touchdowns. Hutson retired as the NFL's all-time leader in receptions, receiving yards, receiving touchdowns, yards from scrimmage, total touchdowns, and scoring, with accompanying single-season records in each of those categories.

The Steve Van Buren Eagles (1944-1949)
48-16-3, .739 regular-season winning percentage, 2 NFL Championships

Few football fans remember Steve Van Buren today. In his rookie season, 1944, Van Buren led the NFL in punt return touchdowns and kickoff return touchdowns. The next season, he led the NFL in rushing and set the single-season record for rushing TDs. Two years later, he set the single-season record for rushing yards. Two seasons after that, he set a new one. Van Buren retired as the NFL's all-time leader in rushing yards and rushing touchdowns, but he was really at his best in big games and bad conditions. The 1948 NFL Championship Game was played in heavy snow, the 1949 game in ankle-deep mud. Van Buren scored the only touchdown in the '48 game, and in '49 he ran for a then-record 196 yards, powering the Eagles to victory in both contests. During this six-year stretch, Philadelphia won three Eastern Division titles and outscored opponents 1818-1016.

The Otto Graham Browns (1946-1955)
105-17-4, .849 regular-season winning percentage, 4 AAFC Championships, 3 NFL Championships

The Cleveland Browns were the first racially-integrated team in the Modern Era of professional football. They were also a dynasty of almost unimaginable proportions. Born in the All-America Football Conference, Cleveland dominated the league, going 47-4-3 (.898) and winning all four league championships before a partial merger with the NFL that also included the AAFC's San Francisco 49ers and Baltimore Colts. The first game of the 1950 season was a matchup between the AAFC's Browns and the two-time defending NFL champion Eagles. The media billed the contest as "The World Series of Pro Football," but the Eagles were heavily favored. Cleveland won the game 35-10. NFL apologists, desperately seeking an excuse, complained that the Browns passed too much. When the two teams re-matched three months later, Cleveland won 13-6 without throwing a single pass, the last time any NFL team has gone an entire game without passing.

The Browns went on to win the NFL Championship, and NFL Commissioner Bert Bell called them "the greatest team to ever play football." In each of the next three seasons, the Browns won their conference but lost the NFL Championship Game. In the 1954 and '55 seasons, Cleveland added two more NFL titles, with dominant championship wins of 56-10 and 38-14. The Browns' dynasty finally ended with the retirement of quarterback Otto Graham after the 1955 season.

During its four seasons in the AAFC, Cleveland had an .898 regular-season winning percentage, won the league championship every year, and outscored opponents 1561-683. Over the next six seasons, playing in the NFL, the Browns went 58-13-1 (.813), made all six championship games, won three titles, and outscored opponents 1984-1051. During Graham's ten-year career, the team was 105-17-4 (imagine a team going 13-3 or 14-2 every season for a decade) and played in the championship game every year, won seven titles, and outscored opposing teams 3545-1734, a margin of more than 2-to-1.

The Buddy Parker Lions (1952-1957)
48-23-1, .674 regular-season winning percentage, 3 NFL Championships

The most competitive rivalry of the 1950s featured the Detroit Lions and the Los Angeles Rams. From 1950-55, the Lions or Rams won every Western Conference title, and every NFL Championship was won by one of those two or the Browns. The problem for Detroit and L.A. was that they played in the same conference. Detroit, with three championships to the Rams' one, came out on top.

The Lions were quarterbacked by Hall of Famer Bobby Layne, but the team's greatest strength was its defense. Two Hall of Fame safeties, Jack Christiansen and Yale Lary, were joined by middle linebacker Joe Schmidt, who has been forgotten today (along with all the other greats who played before televised games were commonplace), but was one of the greatest defensive players in history. Christiansen and Lary, in addition to their superb defense — they combined for 96 career interceptions — were important special teams contributors, as well. Christiansen was probably the best punt returner in history, and Lary was one of the greatest punters ever.

Detroit's .674 winning percentage doesn't look particularly dynastic: that's 10 or 11 wins per year in a 16-game season, which is good, but not Don Hutson or Otto Graham territory. The problem is that Layne was hurt in 1955, playing all season with a bad shoulder, and the team went 3-9. Take out that one bad year, and the Lions were 45-14-1 (.758). They "only" outscored opponents 1733-1280, but again, drop that '55 campaign, and it's 1503-1005. This team wasn't as dominant in the regular season as the other teams we've examined, but it won three championships, two of them against Graham's Browns. Part of the way we measure dynasties is by their performance against other great teams, and in that respect, the 1950s Lions measure up with just about anyone.

The Vince Lombardi Packers (1959-1967)
89-29-4, .746 regular-season winning percentage, 5 NFL Championships

The team that brought dynasties into the Super Bowl era, Lombardi's Packers won NFL Championships in 1961 and '62 and three straight years from 1965-67, the only team in history with three straight NFL titles. The last two league championships, in 1966 and '67, earned the Packers the right to play in Super Bowls I and II. Green Bay won big both times, 35-10 and 33-14. This team was stocked with legends, from the head coach and quarterback (Lombardi and Bart Starr, respectively) to a pair of Hall of Fame running backs and two Hall of Fame offensive lineman to a legendary middle linebacker to multiple Hall of Famers on the defensive line and in the defensive backfield. I haven't even mentioned borderline HOFers Jerry Kramer, Ron Kramer, and Dave Robinson.

During Lombardi's tenure in Green Bay, his team compiled a record that translates to nine seasons of 12-4 football, while outscoring the opposition 3080-1873. That's impressive and, yes, dynastic. But what really set the Packers apart was their performance in the postseason. Lombardi's 9-1 record as a coach in the postseason is the best in history — others have more wins, but no one can touch his .900 winning percentage — and the team's five NFL championships in seven years are unequaled throughout the league's history.

The Roger Staubach Cowboys (1969-1979)
116-41-1, .737 regular-season winning percentage, won 2 Super Bowls

The Cowboys actually had 20 winning seasons in a row, from 1966-1985, but this was the most dominant stretch. During the 11 seasons Staubach was in Dallas, the team made the playoffs nine times, played in five Super Bowls, and won two championships. Two may not sound like much after Lombardi's Packers, but the Cowboys were a dominant, front-running team for a decade or more. Season-in, season-out, it was a given that you had to beat the Cowboys if you wanted to win it all. During a decade in which Minnesota, Washington, and the Rams were all strong teams, the Cowboys still won the NFC five times in ten seasons. The only other team with five Super Bowl appearances in a ten-year period is nobody.

And it's really a nine-year period, beginning with Super Bowl V and ending with Super Bowl XIII.

During the Staubach years, the Cowboys outscored their opponents 3818-2539. The team features plenty of Hall of Famers — besides Staubach, you've got head coach Tom Landry, offensive tackle Rayfield Wright, defensive tackles Bob Lilly and Randy White, defensive back Mel Renfro, and a year or two from several others — but it also has plenty of snubs, most notably wide receiver Bob Hayes, linebacker Chuck Howley, and safety Cliff Harris.

The Paul Warfield Dolphins (1970-1975)
67-16-1, .804 regular-season winning percentage, won 2 Super Bowls

I can hear you now. What Dolphin dynasty? Who the heck is Paul Warfield?

These Dolphin teams won three straight AFC championships and two Super Bowls, including that 1972 season you might have heard about. What's interesting is that if you listen to players and coaches from that team, almost to a man they swear that the 1973 team, which "only" went 12-2, was better than the undefeated '72 Dolphins. Their 1972-73 seasons represent the best two-year record in league history, and the other years I've included (10-4, 10-3-1, 11-3, 10-4) weren't too shabby, either.

Paul Warfield was a wide receiver, one of five Hall of Famers on Miami's offense. He began his career in Cleveland while Jim Brown was still playing. In Warfield's rookie season, he finished fourth in the NFL in receiving yards and Cleveland won the NFL Championship. But Cleveland was a running team — Brown was succeeded by another Hall of Famer, Leroy Kelly — and Warfield didn't post big numbers. In 1970 he was traded to Miami, where he also did not post big numbers.

The Dolphins were so good at this time that they seldom needed to pass. With the best interior offensive line in the history of professional football (Jim Langer, Larry Little, and Bob Kuechenberg) and the best one-two running back punch in the league (Larry Csonka and Mercury Morris), the Dolphins were a running team. But with Warfield in the lineup, the deep pass was always a threat. He averaged more than 20 yards per reception for his career — as a comparison, Randy Moss averages 15.8 — and retired with 85 receiving TDs, which was then the third-highest total in history.

In addition to a great offense, Miami also boasted one of the league's best defenses. From 1970-75, the Dolphins outscored opposing teams 2024-1161. Their .804 winning percentage over that span is equivalent to about 13-3 in a 16-game season. The team's dominance eventually ended due to a combination of defections (Warfield and Csonka both left for the World Football League) and the rise of the Steel Curtain.

The Steel Curtain (1972-1979)
88-27-1, .763 regular-season winning percentage, won 4 Super Bowls

I've identified other dynastic teams by a star player or coach, but the Steelers had so many great players, it's impossible — insulting, even — to restrict it to a single person. This club featured ten Hall of Famers: Chuck Noll, Terry Bradshaw, Franco Harris, John Stallworth, Lynn Swann, Mike Webster, Joe Greene, Jack Ham, Jack Lambert, and Mel Blount. The Steel Curtain was probably the best defense in the history of professional football, and the offense had more Hall of Famers. This team was exceptional on both sides of the ball.

More than anything, it had an aura of success. From 1972-79, Pittsburgh went 50-1 against teams that finished under .500. These guys just didn't underperform. More importantly, though, they raised their game when the stakes were highest. Bradshaw, Harris, and Swann were all big-game players, guys who saved their best moments for the biggest stage. Pittsburgh's last Super Bowl win came against the overachieving '79 Rams, but the other three were against the mighty Vikings, led by Fran Tarkenton and the Purple Gang, or — in Super Bowls X and XIII — the Roger Staubach Cowboys. From 1972-79, the Steelers outscored their opponents 2765-1574.

The Ted Hendricks Raiders (1974-1983)
103-42, .710 regular-season winning percentage, won 3 Super Bowls

I could call them the Stabler/Plunkett Raiders, but Hendricks — a Hall of Fame linebacker — arrived in 1976, when the Raiders won their first Super Bowl, and retired after the 1983 season, when they won their third and final Super Bowl. The Raiders have a lower winning percentage than most of the other teams we're examining, but they're distinguished by consistent success. From 1965-1986, they had only one losing season. Along the way, they played in 11 AFL or AFC Championship Games and four Super Bowls. Eleven conference championship appearances in 17 years? Twenty-one winning seasons in 22 years? Those are special accomplishments.

I've chosen this 12-year period to represent the team, even though it omits 1967-1970, when Oakland was 45-8-3 (.830) and played in four conference championship games. The Ted Hendricks years — really 1976-83 — represent the heart of the team's Super Bowl success, and I tacked on 1974-75, when the Raiders went 23-5 (.821) and played in two AFC Championship Games, losing both to the Steel Curtain dynasty. During this time, the Raiders, playing in both Oakland and Los Angeles, outscored opposing teams 3446-2757. Hall of Famers included Hendricks, John Madden, Fred Biletnikoff, Dave Casper, Art Shell, Gene Upshaw, Willie Brown, Howie Long, and — just for a year or two — Marcus Allen, George Blanda, Mike Haynes, and Jim Otto. There was an awful lot of talent on these teams.

The Joe Montana 49ers (1981-1990)
112-39-1, .740 regular-season winning percentage, won 4 Super Bowls

There is a case to be made for extending this dynasty into the Steve Young years, since from 1991-94, the team was 47-17 (.734) and won another Super Bowl. But one Super Bowl in four years doesn't look so great after four titles in nine years with Montana at the helm. Besides, we don't want to step on anyone's toes here, especially Jerry Jones'.

The 1980s were dominated by the NFC. Even the two Super Bowls won by the Raiders (in 1980 and '83) were upsets over strong NFC teams. This ultra-competitive NFC featured the 49ers, a similarly dynastic team in Washington, the Bills Parcells Giants, and the Mike Ditka Bears. Emerging from this glut of greatness, San Francisco conquered the NFC four times in the 1980s, winning the Super Bowl all four times. These teams didn't have a lot of Hall of Famers. Head coach Bill Walsh is in, and Montana is in. Ronnie Lott is in. Defensive end Fred Dean was just elected to the Hall, but he retired after the 1985 season, and didn't play in Super Bowls XXIII or XXIV. Jerry Rice is a sure-fire Hall of Famer when he becomes eligible, but he didn't enter the league until 1985, missing Super Bowls XVI and XIX. That means the Niners had three Hall of Fame players in each Super Bowl.

How did this team accomplish so much with only a few superstars? Well, first of all, it had a lot of good players who weren't HOF-caliber, but were decidedly above average, people like Dwight Clark and Roger Craig. Secondly, Rice and Lott were not only Hall of Famers, they were outstanding in a historic sense. But the keys were Walsh and Montana. Walsh was an innovator who always made the most of what was available. Montana was one of the greatest quarterbacks ever to play, and he was at his best in big games. Many fans know that Montana — the only three-time Super Bowl MVP in history — never threw an interception in the Super Bowl. What is less well-known is that from 1981-90, the 49ers went 51-22 against teams that finished at or above .500. That .699 winning percentage against good teams is among the best in history. Imagine going 11-5 against a schedule made up of nothing but playoff teams, and that's the Joe Montana 49ers.

The Joe Gibbs Redskins (1982-1991)
107-45, .704 regular-season winning percentage, won 3 Super Bowls

I've written before about Washington's 1983 season. I named them the second-best team not to win a Super Bowl and the sixth-best offense in history. The team went 14-2, with both losses coming by a single point, and set a league record for points in a season. Quarterback Joe Theismann was named NFL MVP, John Riggins set a new single-season touchdown record, and the defense led the NFL in interceptions and rushing defense. They won their first playoff game 51-7 and beat Montana's 49ers in the NFC Championship. Then they went out and got blasted by the Raiders in Super Bowl XVIII, losing 38-9.

I gave you a whole paragraph about that team — which many Washington fans insist was the best in franchise history — because if Washington had won that Super Bowl, it would have matched San Francisco with four wins, and there might be legitimate debate as to who was the team of the '80s. Hall of Famers on these teams included Gibbs, Riggins, and newly-elected members Art Monk and Darrell Green. Interestingly, none of those players appeared in all four Super Bowls. Riggins retired after the 1985 season, Green wasn't drafted until 1983, and Monk missed Super Bowl XVII with an injury. It seems likely that at least one of the Hogs — the famous offensive line that anchored Washington's dynasty — will also be selected to the Hall in the future (guard Russ Grimm, a four-time finalist, seems most probable).

Like San Francisco's dynasty, Washington's success during the (first) Joe Gibbs era was remarkable because of the competition. Just to get out of the NFC East, Washington had to beat Parcells' Giants and strong Cowboy and Eagle teams. Once they got to the playoffs, though, Gibbs was almost unstoppable. From 1982-91, Washington was 16-5 in the postseason. The only teams with better postseason records are Lombardi's Packers (9-1) and the Tom Brady Patriots (14-3).

The Jimmy Johnson Cowboys (1991-1995)
60-20, .750 regular-season winning percentage, won 3 Super Bowls

This group had the shortest reign on the list, with only five years of true dominance, but made up for lost quantity with lots of quality. A .750 winning percentage is nice — the Cowboys were 11-5 in 1991, then 13-3, followed by three straight seasons at 12-4. More than regular-season dominance, though, what set this team apart was its success in the postseason, and specifically, against the K-Gun Bills, the Steve Young 49ers, and the Mike Holmgren Packers.

In the 1992 playoffs, Dallas won the NFC Championship Game at San Francisco and pounded Buffalo 52-17 in Super Bowl XXVII. The next year, they beat the Brett Favre-led Packers in the divisional playoffs, the 49ers in the NFC Championship, and the Bills in the Super Bowl. In '94, a 35-9 pounding of the Packers was followed — finally — by a loss at San Francisco in the NFC title game. But Dallas was back in '95, beating Green Bay for the NFC Championship before conquering the Steelers in Super Bowl XXX. Nothing says "dynasty" like beating other great teams.

During these five seasons, the Cowboys outscored other teams 1976-1321. Several of the best players from this era aren't eligible for the Hall of Fame yet, but Troy Aikman and Michael Irvin are already in, while Emmitt Smith is a lock when he becomes eligible. Larry Allen and Deion Sanders, who joined the 'Boys in 1994 and '95, respectively, also have secure places in Canton. No one else seems likely to get in, but safety Darren Woodson and sack specialist Charles Haley will have a chance, center Mark Stepnoski has a prayer, and I personally feel that fullback Daryl Johnston should have gotten in on the first ballot.

The Tom Brady Patriots (2001-2007)
86-26, .768 regular-season winning percentage, won 3 Super Bowls

Note that even with the Super Bowl loss, and if the Patriots collapse next year, their legacy is already secure. Seven seasons is very decent, a .768 winning percentage is great, and three Super Bowl victories is unassailable. The controversy here, if any exists, is that I've named this dynasty after its quarterback rather than its head coach. Why? Well, Bill Belichick coached the Patriots in 2000, when the team went 5-11 — not that I blame him for that — and Brady didn't become a starter until '01, which is when the winning started. And — let's be straight here — he's a pretty good quarterback.

This is an "and counting" dynasty, so it's very difficult to predict its Hall of Fame roster, but here's my best guess. Locks include Belichick, Brady, and Junior Seau. Near-locks are Randy Moss and Richard Seymour, while the strongest maybes are Rodney Harrison and Adam Vinatieri, though there are others — particularly some of the younger guys — who will have a shot as well. During the dynasty years, New England has outscored opponents 2890-1965.

Sorting Things Out

I've shown you a lot of numbers. Let's try to put them all in one place, starting with regular-season winning percentage.

Regular-Season Winning Percentage

There are four teams that I believe stand out here. Two are the Browns (.849) and Dolphins (.804), with their +.800 winning percentages. On the other side are the Giants (.689) and Lions (.674), both well under .700. I would also give positive marks to the Bears (.782), who were in the very high .700s, and the Patriots, who are .768 in an era when that kind of success is very difficult to sustain.

Points For and Against

Points For and Against

I'm not sure how valuable this data is, but it's interesting to see how closely the ratio of points for to points against corresponds to winning percentage.

Championship Appearances and Titles

From 1966 on, only Super Bowls qualify for titles and championship appearances.

Championship Appearances and Titles

The Browns stand out in a big way here, with the Bears (seven title game appearances) and Lombardi's Packers (five championships) also positively distinguished. Less impressive are the Eagles and Dolphins, each with only two titles and three championship appearances.

Before we actually rank these 15 groups, let's remember that these are probably the 15 most dynastic teams in NFL history; ranking 15th is a compliment, not an insult. I think the top six are the ones which have to qualify as dynasties. The seventh to 10th spots are borderline, and I think 11-15 were just great teams, not real dynasties.

15. The Steve Van Buren Eagles (1944-1949)

In 1948, when the Eagles won their first championship, the Browns went 14-0 in the AAFC. The Eagles dominated the NFL in the late 1940s, but their dominance was short-lived, and it is possible that they were never the best team in professional football.

14. The Mel Hein Giants (1933-1941)

They ruled the NFL's Eastern Division, but seldom matched up with the best teams in the West. Their best record was 9-1-1 in 1939, when they lost 27-0 in the NFL Championship Game. This was a great team, but probably only the third-best of its own era.

13. The Buddy Parker Lions (1952-1957)

Conventional wisdom rates them higher than this, but the only area in which the Lions excelled was their championship total. That's the name of the game, and it's the reason they're ranked here at all, but the Lions weren't really a dominant team. In only one of these six seasons (1953) did they post a record of .800 or better.

12. The Paul Warfield Dolphins (1970-1975)

I know they had that .804 regular-season winning percentage, but I'm not impressed by short-lived dominance. Six years is very good, but it's just not that impressive with this kind of company.

11. The Ted Hendricks Raiders (1974-1983)

There are several ways to look at this team. A nice way is as one of the most talented teams in the history of professional football. Another is as a group of colossal underachievers who couldn't beat the Steelers and frequently lost when the stakes were highest.

10. The Don Hutson Packers (1936-1944)

I ranked them sixth when I wrote my original piece three years ago. There are four main reasons I have dropped them now: [1] They're a clear-cut second to the Bears in their own era; [2] They had very little star power outside of Hutson; [3] Most great players left football for the war, and in their absence, Hutson dominated the league in a way that never has and never will be replicated; [4] The Patriots passed them.

9. The Jimmy Johnson Cowboys (1991-1995)

Five seasons. If you made them hang on for 10 years, their record is 101-59 (.631). I hate myself for ranking them ahead of Hutson.

8. The Joe Gibbs Redskins (1982-1991)

Like Hutson's Packers, their problem is ranking second in their own decade. That .704 regular-season winning percentage didn't blow me out of the water, either. The team got very inconsistent — or the NFC East just got really tough — in the late 1980s.

7. The Roger Staubach Cowboys (1969-1979)

Given that they only won two Super Bowls, I think this a pretty generous ranking. I do like the prolonged dominance.

6. The Tom Brady Patriots (2001-2007)

I suspect they will eventually be higher than this.

5. The Joe Montana 49ers (1981-1990)

Yes, I know you think they should be higher. But they barely beat Washington as team of the decade, they only had three or four Hall of Fame players, and they only had four or five really great seasons.

4. The Sid Luckman Bears (1933-1943)

A reasonable argument can be made for putting them at the top of the list. Or the bottom of the list, I guess, since I'm doing this in reverse order. Four titles. Seven championship appearances. Hall of Famers galore. Incredible winning percentage and ratio of points for and against. But almost all of that was done from 1940-43. Yes, the Bears won a championship in 1933. The next one came seven years later. And the Bears, like Green Bay, benefited from certain people not going to war, most notably Luckman. Did Chicago lose good players? Absolutely. I just don't see this being better than the Steelers.

3. The Steel Curtain (1972-1979)

I agonized over who to put second. The 1970s Steelers dominated a decade of dynasties. On this list alone, they beat out the Cowboys, Dolphins, and Raiders. I've ranked them third, but if you want to put Pittsburgh second, I'm not going to argue with that, either.

2. The Vince Lombardi Packers (1959-1967)

Why did I rank them ahead of the Steelers? Math. The Steelers won four championships; the Packers won five. Green Bay made it to six championship games, while the Steelers only played in four. The Packers had 11 Hall of Famers to Pittsburgh's 10. Little differences, all of them, but added up, I gave Green Bay the edge.

1. The Otto Graham Browns (1946-1955)

I admit it: I am awed by this team. You've probably been able to tell since the beginning of this article. The Browns won seven league championships; no one else won more than five. The Browns played in 10 straight title games; no one else made more than four in a row (or more than seven total). The Browns posted a disgusting .849 winning percentage, while no one else topped .804. The one team that got that high, Miami, did it over a period of six years, which is much easier than sustaining that kind of dominance for a decade. Even if you don't trust the AAFC statistics, Cleveland was .813 in the NFL. That's still better than anyone else! They played for the championship every single year! It's insane, and it will never be equaled.

Posted by Brad Oremland at 11:15 AM | Comments (4)

February 7, 2008

Sport Q&A: Super Bowl Edition

Did Gisele Bundchen's presence at the Super Bowl have any bearing on Tom Brady's less-than-MVP-like performance in the game?

Gisele Bunchen is no Jessica Simpson. And Tom Brady is no Tony Romo. Obviously, Brady's mind was elsewhere. But can you blame him? Personally, I can think of no better distraction as a quarterback than gazing up into a luxury suite and seeing my supermodel girlfriend knocking back a glass of wine like it was Kool-Aid. However, there's no way Brady was thinking of Gisele with Michael Strahan, Osi Umenyiora, and Justin Tuck flying at him from all directions. Apparently, Brady's offensive linemen must have been picturing Gisele in a three-point stance instead of the Giants in front of them, because they offered a limp resistance to the onrush.

But let's try not to shed a tear for Brady. He's got three Super Bowl rings to fall back on, as well as a great shoulder on which to cry, and as his tears slowly trickle down Gisele's bronzed skin, sensually finding their way past the slope of her shoulder, over her collarbone, and down into a gentle resting place between the soft recesses of her perfect ... see how easy it is to be distracted by Gisele.

How did the Giants complete one of the most unlikely upsets in Super Bowl history?

The Giants two best drives of the game were a 16-play, 77-yard, 9:59 drive for a field goal and a 12-play, 83-yard, 2:07 march that ended with a touchdown. That left the prolific Patriots offense with only one first quarter possession, only 35 seconds to manufacture a game-winning or game-tying drive, and an entire offseason to suffer the taunts of the 1972 Dolphins, as well as answer the tough questions. Like, "How did you lose this game?" and "What teams have you not illegally taped?" In between those two drives, the Giants made all the plays that, had they not made, could have turned the game in the Patriots' favor. And, in a game that close, one play was likely the difference.

Two plays like that stand out. One was Ahmad Bradshaw's fumble that he recovered himself by wresting it away from New England linebacker Pierre Woods. It wouldn't be the first time a Frenchman has given something up so easily. Woods looked to have recovered the ball on the bottom of the pile, and the Patriots probably should have taken possession, but Bradshaw snatched the ball away, as well as Woods' wallet. I'm not sure if the play was reviewable, but if it was, Bill Belichick should have tossed the red flag. A recovery would have given the Patriots the ball at the New York 30, and, at worst, New England would have scored a field goal, assuming Belichick opted not to try and convert an impossible fourth down conversion.

The other play was David Tyree's miraculous catch of Eli Manning's fourth quarter pass, made after Manning escaped a sure sack. Tyree out-leaped Rodney Harrison and grabbed the ball with two hands, maintaining possession by pinning the ball against his helmet without letting it touch the ground as he fell to the turf. And thank goodness Tyree didn't let that ball touch the ground. Otherwise, we would have witnessed one of the most controversial plays in Super Bowl history. However the officials would have ruled the play (had the ball touched the ground), the play would have certainly been challenged, and replay officials probably would have blown the call, ruining what was otherwise a well-officiated game.

How did the Patriots lose this game?

It boils down to one thing: overconfidence. Of course, when you enter the Super Bowl 18-0 and a double-digit favorite, you have the right to be the cock of the walk. But, as Plaxico Burress stated on behalf of the Giants, "We've come to snuff the rooster, and punch the donkey." Actually, he didn't say that, at least not in so many words. New England's confidence, however, somewhat clouded their judgment. On three critical plays in the game, New England players and/or coaches failed to make the plays or calls that possibly could have been the difference in winning or losing.

First, on Eli Manning's touchdown pass to David Tyree, Asante Samuel easily could have broken up the pass by extending his left arm. Instead, he went for the interception. Samuel had the play covered, but went for all the glory when he should have simply just knocked the pass down. Now, I know Samuel is one of the best cornerbacks in the league, and he does have dreadlocks, but that's no excuse to gamble when he should make the smart play, especially in a four-point game.

Second, Bill Belichick's decision to go for it on 4th-and-13 from the Giants' 31-yard line was simply foolish. The Patriots had two series on the day in which they couldn't gain 10 yards in three plays against a Giants defense playing its best game of the season. What made Belichick think the Pats could break off a chunk of yardage that big in one play is Marty Schottenheimer's guess. New England held a 7-3 lead at this point. A successful field goal would have given the Pats a 10-3 lead.

Finally, New England's decision to single-cover Burress with Ellis Hobbs on the game-winning play must have come straight from the Green Bay game plan. Hobbs was beat so bad that Burress' catch will go down as the easiest Super Bowl game-winning play of all time. He had so much time, he could have said "Jackie Smith" seven or eight times before securing that catch. Previously, the Giants made the same mistake by single-covering Randy Moss on his earlier touchdown catch. That should have been a lesson to Belichick. Instead, he chose to put Hobbs all alone across from Burress, who almost always beats single-coverage. Hobbs went for the inside fake, even though nine times out of 10, when you're facing a 6'5" receiver, the jump ball to the corner is the play. Game over.

How does Plaxico Burress' victory guarantee compare to that of Joe Namath's in Super Bowl III?

Burress correctly predicted a Giants win, and had he ran from University of Phoenix Stadium with his index finger raised high, without saying a word, his guarantee would have gone down in history alongside Namath's as the most memorable in Super Bowl history. Unfortunately, Burress was flagged down by FOX's Pam Oliver, and after giving a fairly incoherent and grammatically poor interview in which he called Oliver "man," Burress broke down and cried. Touching, yes, but not Namath-like.

Burress could have redeemed himself by asking Oliver for a kiss, but he failed in that endeavor. With tears streaming down Burress' cheeks, I fully expected "One Shining Moment" to start playing. Eli Manning may be going to Disney World, but Plaxico's going on Oprah.

What's the deal with superstar wide receivers crying this postseason? First, Terrell Owens squeals like a baby while proclaiming his love for Tony Romo, then Burress gets all misty-eyed. You'd never see Randy Moss shed a tear in such a situation. He's stone faced, whether winning, losing, or detaining a female friend against her will.

What was the best Super Bowl commercial?

My vote goes to the Bridgestone ad starring Alice Cooper and Richard Simmons. Honestly, did you ever think you'd see those two cross paths? I doubt that's the first time Simmons has lost a masculinity contest to someone named "Alice." But what kind of driver passes both Cooper with his snake and Simmons aerobicizing in the middle of the road, instead of stopping to pick up Cooper, then mow down Simmons? That would have been two good deeds done in one trip.

I could have easily gone for the Tide "talking stain" commercial, but the voice of the stain was just not irritating enough. What that ad needed was the voice of Gilbert Gottfried.

All of the Bud Light ads were entertaining, but I liken Bud Light ads to promos for the Pro Bowl. No matter how many ads for Bud Light I see, I won't start drinking Bud Light. And no matter how many Pro Bowl ads I see, I'm not going to watch it.

Other highlights were seeing Charles Barkley peering into a refrigerator with double doors, and seeing Shaquille O'Neal ride a thoroughbred to victory (something Kobe Bryant would claim Shaq's done on many occasions).

Was Terry Bradshaw on the verge of kissing Tom Coughlin as he interviewed the coach after the game?

Bradshaw and Coughlin were getting awfully close to each other, and neither seemed to mind. It's probably the closest Coughlin's come to getting a kiss in the last 10 years, and that includes his wife. His players should have waited and dumped the ice water on Coughlin then. I think Bradshaw was thrilled that Tom Brady wasn't able to join Bradshaw and Joe Montana in the "four Super Bowl win" club. For his part, Coughlin should have saved his goo-goo eyes when he thanked the person most responsible for the Giants Super Bowl win. No, not the great Jesus Christ. But Brett Favre. Jesus Christ would have never made that terrible pass in the NFC championship game that was intercepted and led to Lawrence Tynes' game-winning field goal.

Why all the fuss about Bill Belichick leaving the field early?

Give Belichick a break. If you were wearing that hideous outfit for three plus hours, you'd want to make a change the first chance you got, too. Unlike Janet Jackson, Belichick puts clothes on and has a wardrobe malfunction. Besides, when you're Belichick, you need a jump start to get to the locker rooms and prepare for interviews in which you offer no insight or redeemable answers to questions posed by reporters. The man is evasive. Maybe Belichick will be a little more candid when he's speaking under oath in front of Congress about some certain film footage from a Rams walk-through in New Orleans, 2002, or a motorcade in Dallas, 1963.

Will we ever see another undefeated team in the Super Bowl?

I'm not one to say "never," unless I'm referring to the release of a new Guns N' Roses album, but the 1972 Dolphins may have just survived the last great assault on their undefeated record. The last two teams to make a run at history, the 2005 Colts and this year's Patriots, failed to win the Super Bowl. Teams will soon realize that the glory of winning an NFL championship far outweighs the fun of irritating a bunch of 60-somethings still grasping desperately to their one moment in the spotlight.

Get Your Questions Answered!

Do you have a question or comment? Has your approval rating dipped below 20%? Has your blood alcohol content plummeted under .08%? Then start drinking and shaking hands, and send your question/comment/answers and a small donation along with your name and hometown to [email protected].

Posted by Jeffrey Boswell at 11:47 AM | Comments (0)

Finally, A Monk in the Shrine

It is always good to see a wrong righted, no matter how late. At least Art Monk is still alive (although, for years, football fans and sportswriters have wondered if No. 81 would live to see his own bronze bust in Canton). The quiet, workmanlike receiver of the Gibbs Era I Washington teams has finally gotten his due — enshrinement among football's best in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Who knows what took the voters so long? Art Monk caught almost three times as many passes as Lynn Swann, and almost 200 more than Michael Irvin.

Like Irvin, Monk was one of the premier wide receivers of his day, one who played in multiple Super Bowls. Both were big physical receivers. But unlike Irvin, Monk went about his work quietly. At 6'3", 210 lbs, he was a solid blocker, a great pattern runner, and a key target on third-and-long.

Moreover, his numbers merit enshrinement. In the pre-Chris Carter/Jerry Rice 90 reception-a-year era, (when 45 catches in a 14-game season signified stardom), he hauled in 58 passes as a rookie in 1980 and 56 more for 894 yards in '81. The following year was shortened by strike. Monk went on to snare 47, 106, 91, and 73 footballs over the next four seasons. Not too shabby on a team with other offensive threats the likes of John Riggins, Joe Washington, Gary Clark, Ricky Sanders, and George Rogers, to name a few.

Monk played with all manner of QBs — Joe Theisman, Jay Schroeder, Mark Rypien, and Doug Williams. He totaled 1,372 receiving yards in 1984, 1,226 in '85, 1,068 in '86, 1,186 in 1989, and 1,048 and 8 TDs in Rice-era 1991, his 12th campaign. He even caught 46 passes for the 1994 Jets at age 37. He was a team leader, and one of few who spanned the entire (first) Joe Gibbs regime.

Consider Monk’s playoff heroics. Two touchdowns in a 51-7 rout of Eric Dickerson and Jackie Slater's 1983 Rams in a game I saw in person at RFK Stadium. Then 10 grabs for 122 yards in a loss to the '84 Bears, with their defensive backfield including Gary Fencik and Doug Plank. 8-for-126 vs. the '86 rival Giants. 10-for-163 and a score on the 1990 49ers secondary that featured multiple Pro Bowlers.

In all, Art Monk was a good citizen, a community treasure, a beloved teammate who caught a then-NFL record 940 passes. That's like retiring with the all-time mark for steals and not being voted in the Baseball Hall of Fame (pre-HGH). Why was this three-time Pro Bowler, not too shy of 1,000 receptions, perennially passed over for Canton? Lynn Swann is in, with a mere 336 catches, and an equal number of Pro Bowls. Irvin, with 750 receptions, and less TDs than Monk, was a considered a shoo-in.

Yet although it is the Hall of "Fame," and Monk drew no attention to himself, there was a time when Washington garnered as much football publicity and unit nicknames as the Steelers and Cowboys. "The Hogs." "The Fun Bunch." Riggins answered to "The Diesel." Dexter Manley was a character, too. It is not as if Monk labored in complete anonymity. Yet the Hall has passed him by for 14 years.

Typical of him, Monk said he generally lets this time of year (the voting) pass by without devoting too much thought to it, and that he is humbled by the honor. I like Michael Irvin, but wonder what he would have said had he been overlooked this long. Irvin, Randy Moss, and the archetype, Terrell Owens, fit the prima donna wide receiver mold. You know, Keyshawn "Throw Me the Damn Ball" Johnson. Or Chad "Ocho Cinco" Johnson.

Everything may happen for a reason, as Monk gets to enter the Hall with a longtime teammate, another quiet, exemplary leader, former Washington cornerback Darrell Green. The NFL's fastest player. The ultimate Gibbs player: devout and divinely talented. Perhaps the football gods, in the year of Coach Gibbs' second retirement (and in the aftermath of the tragic death of safety Sean Taylor) wanted fans of the burgundy-and-gold to have two reasons to drive to Canton. Monk certainly has more than 81 reasons to belong.

Posted by Bijan C. Bayne at 11:15 AM | Comments (0)

February 6, 2008

Who's Making Headlines?

This is the time of year where some animals are still hibernating. Snow and ice are on the ground. Temperatures are streaking below zero. Gray and gloom fill the sky about 85% of the time here at SC's Minneapolis correspondence center (a little much?). Thank goodness for college basketball. At least something is heating up as we get into February.

The next month will be fun, from Rivalry Week over the next few days to jostling for number one seeds to teams on the verge who desperately need that victory to pad their resume. Storylines will be poured over again and again, and here are some of the better ones that "SportsCenter" and "The Best Damn Sports Show" will hype even more as the tournament approaches.

5) The Pursuit of Perfection

This headline might have changed on Saturday, but now that the Super Bowl is over, that phrase is now on the way from Boston to Memphis. The Tigers survived a stiff test from UTEP to get to 21-0, and John Calipari's squad has turned back everyone, including Arizona, Connecticut, Georgetown, and Gonzaga.

Between now and the conference tournaments, it appears the only bump in the road will come on February 23rd. That's when interstate rival Tennessee will roll into town. They may also get tested in one more conference games down the line. However, if they get past all of that and get to the field of 65 unscathed, can the Tigers fulfill their title goals that have gone begging for the last couple of years?

4) Who Could Fit March's Glass Slipper?

It's more apparent that, despite the large budgets of power conferences, the smaller programs are catching up to big brother. Over the past decade, schools including Gonzaga, St. Joseph's, Kent State, and George Mason have made dream runs to the Elite Eight or better. Now, teams like the 'Zags and conferences the caliber of a Colonial or Missouri Valley have become sort of nouveau riche.

So when looking for this year's eye-opener, you can't include the following: Gonzaga, Butler, anyone from the CAA, MVC, A-10, Mountain West, and WAC, or the New Jersey Institute of Technology (but only because they're 0-for-the-season). Who does that leave?

One-Hit Wonders

Morgan State almost started the season off with a bang, losing by four at Connecticut. Then they barely missed another shocker four games later, going down by four to the Hurricanes in Miami. The Golden Bears look to go four-deep as far as scoring threats, but three average better than 12 points a game. Add that in with the close to double-double average of forward Boubacar Coly (9.8 ppg, 10.6 rpg) and you'll have a team that could give a two-seed a bit of a fit.

Everyone's darling at the beginning of the year was Davidson. Even the big boys took notice. The Wildcats did everything but win against UNC (lost by four) and Duke (by six) on their home court. They also pushed N.C. State to the limit before losing in Raleigh by one. Half of the non-conference schedule included these behemoths and UCLA, so it's understandable that they went 2-6 over that stretch. But sophomore Stephen Curry and the Wildcats found a groove in-conference. With a 13-0 record, a current 11-game winning streak, and an average of just under 80 points a game, this team could be another first round thorn in the side of a perennial Sweet 16 threat.

Staying Along for the Ride

St. Mary's came on strong before Christmas with wins over Oregon, Seton Hall, and at San Diego State. That, along with all three losses on the road (Southern Illinois, Texas, San Diego), helped the Gaels rise into the top 25, giving them the WCC buzz over conference goliath Gonzaga. Freshman point man Patrick Mills (14.5 ppg, 3.9 apg) and a frontcourt with Diamon Simpson (12.7 ppg, 9.4 rpg) and Omar Samhan (12.4 ppg, 7.9 rpg) could give both St. Mary's and Gonzaga something they need for a deep tourney run ... a heated, well-fought conference race (especially after SMC's victory over GU late Monday night).

The Sun Belt conference has pretty much dissolved into a two-team race. South Alabama (18-4) and Western Kentucky (18-5) both sit atop the East Division. Both have been hit by close defeats (each has four losses of six points or less). The Jaguars offset road losses against Ole Miss and Vanderbilt with a home win over Mississippi State. The Hilltoppers went down in their first contest with USA, while missing out against the Zags, Vols, and Salukis. Wins over Michigan and Nebraska help cushion the hurt a little.

Whoever makes it to the Dance, fans better get ready for some dynamic guard play and high-scoring action.

3) Adding Some Bite to Their Bark

Over the last few years, Drake has been the standardized sub-average squad of the MVC. The program hadn't had a winning conference record since the 1985-86 season. While Southern Illinois, Wichita State, Creighton, and Bradley all were making Sweet 16 appearances, the Bulldogs were consistently scraping barnacles off the Valley floor. Not even former University of Iowa legend Dr. Tom Davis could provide any instant magic to the program during his tenure.

But that's all changing relatively quickly with a hire in relatively close proximity. Davis' son, Keno, took over the team this year, and the results are astounding. Heading into Tuesday night's contest at second-place Illinois State, the top Dogs are riding a 19-game winning streak. They're unbeaten in conference and have only lost at previously touted St. Mary's. Led by three double-digit scorers and do-everything guard Adam Emmenecker, Drake will easily make their first NCAA tournament since 1971.

Kind of reminds us of a similar story from this time last year. Newbie head coach (Keno Davis/Tony Bennett) takes over for legendary father (Dr. Tom Davis/Dick Bennett) at a long-starved program (Drake/Washington State). The Cougars ended up as a four seed in the '07 tourney. The Bulldogs are projected around a four seed for the '08 version. Geometry fans, can you smell the symmetry?

2) He's the Beas(ley) Knees

Trash talk might not always be the best solution in a rivalry situation, especially when that rivalry is considerably one-sided. But then again, a newbie who averages more than 25 points and 12 rebounds a game may not need to show common courtesy.

Michael Beasley has been nothing short of this year's freshman stud. He's somewhat of a mix of last season's prized recruits, showing the scoring ability of Kevin Durant and the inside presence of Greg Oden. All together, that makes for a beast of a player. And when the beast talks, saying that they could play in-state behemoth Kansas anywhere (including Africa) and beat them, we should listen.

The super frosh delivered last week with 25 points, a perfect 4-of-4 from three, and 6 boards as the Wildcats upset the unbeaten Jayhawks and snapped a 24-game home losing streak to said rival in the process. Chances are that Beasley will head to the pros after this season. However, with his ability to be the '08 version of Durant or Oden, this team should be a fun one to watch come tourney time.

1) Coming Out of Hibernation

This is such an understatement that it probably shouldn't even register as a metaphor about the Baylor Bears. It's becoming a well-documented story regarding the turnaround of Baylor basketball this season. And it's a far cry from 2003.

That was when the unthinkable came to life. Forward Patrick Dennehy traveled to Waco hoping to play 12 basketball. The Bears were starting to build momentum with his presence on the court. But that all too tragically came to a stop when teammate Carlos Dotson murdered the New Mexico transfer.

In a seedy, shady situation that starts to approach the gruesome reality of a Stephen King novel, NCAA violations, false accusations, and greedy tendencies led to an unnecessary death and an unnecessary loss of freedom. At the center of it all was former head coach Dave Bliss, who, along with the athletic director, resigned with shame. This all left the basketball program in ruins.

Enter optimism in the form of current head coach Scott Drew. The former Valparaiso coach came in with a mindset that he could direct the program back to respectability. It's looking like he may just surpass his own expectations. After three years with 8, 9, and 4 wins (the last one coming in a year where the Bears could not play non-conference opponents), Baylor finished 15-16 last year.

Going into Wednesday's game against Texas Tech, the team already has 16 victories and is 4-2 in Big 12 play. This is putting the program on track for its first bid in March Madness since 1988. Even though I'm a Missouri Tiger fan and an Iowa State alum, this team, above all else, should be the one that everyone roots for this year.

Posted by Jonathan Lowe at 11:58 AM | Comments (3)

With Gasol in L.A., NBA West Even Wilder

I remember coming into work and turning on ESPNews on one of the TVs. There, in the bottom right was "breaking news" from the NBA. Because the box was so small, it can only display a couple of details. Anyway, it read "Memphis trades Pau Gasol for Kwame Brown," and I nearly passed out. Sure, the Lakers did have to give up more, but anytime you can trade for a top-30 player and the headliner you are giving up is Kwame Brown, you know you made a good trade.

With Gasol in the mix, the Lakers went from sitting ducks after Andrew Bynum went down to injury to being a driving force in the ultra-competitive Western Conference. Gasol instantly gives them a low-post threat that is good for 20 points and 10 rebounds a night. Once Bynum comes back (expected to be in mid-March), the Lakers will have arguably the most dynamic front-court duo in the NBA. Throw in Kobe Bryant, and this is a team who can now contend for a shot to go to the Finals, whereas before, they may have only been able to get by the first round.

So, with Gasol heading to Tinseltown, here is a breakdown of how the rest of the West is shaking up before the All-Star Break::

Phoenix — Anytime you have Steve Nash, you're going to be in it until the bitter end. Nash is once again leading the league in assists at the break, and has a lot of guys to hand the ball off to. Amare Stoudemire leads the team in points and blocks, Shawn Marion continues to be a fantasy basketball freak, filling up the stat sheet in every category, and Leandro Barabosa coming off the bench to average almost 17 points a game. The biggest surprise has to be Grant Hill, who has had yet another comeback year in his first season with the Suns, averaging 14 points and 30 minutes a game.

Dallas — While the Mavs are the reigning No. 1 seed in the West, they have snuck up on people, mainly because of how well they play at home, losing only three in 23 chances. Josh Howard has really come into his own this season, becoming a major force on the glass with his 7.5 boards a game. Dirk is a rock for this team, but when you add in Howard, Jason Terry, and Devin Harris into the equation, you're looking at a team that can score with the best of them. Also, when a team averages 82.2% from the line, you know they will have an advantage in close games.

New Orleans — In what has to be the surprise of the year, the Hornets have been tearing it up through the first half, and were the No. 1 team in the West at one point. Chris Paul maturing process has been faster than anyone could have ever thought. In just his third season, CP3 is among the lead candidates for MVP, averaging 20 points and 11 assists a game. With Paul's emergence also has come two other legitimate stars in David West and Tyson Chandler. West, who will be making his first all-star appearance this year in his home arena, is averaging almost a double-double a game, and Chandler has been an animal in the post, recording at least 10 rebounds in 24 of his last 30 games.

San Antonio — Of course, you can never discount the defending champs. The Spurs are still clinging to the ideals that brought them to the dance: no frills, solid basketball. Three Spurs are averaging nearly 20 points a game, and while Tim Duncan, Manu Ginobili, and Tony Parker will guide the offense, it will be the Spurs' defense and their experience that will spear-head their quest to repeat. The Spurs' will also be relying heavily on their bench players, as only one of their starting five (Parker) being under 30 years of age.

Denver — The Nuggets have one of the best scoring combination in the league with Allen Iverson and Carmelo Anthony, but the success has been predicated upon the surprise play of two players in particular: Marcus Camby and Linas Kleiza. Camby is leading the league in rebounds in his 11th year in the league, and Kleiza has proven to be a reliable third scoring option in just his third season.

Golden State — The Warriors made a name for themselves with their amazing upset over Dallas in the first round of last year's playoffs. Baron Davis is the clear-cut leader in terms of being a floor general and the emotional driving force behind the team's success. The Warriors can go up to eight deep in their rotation, and are chalk-full of scorers. Al Harrington and Steven Jackson are reliable veterans, and Monta Ellis' performance this year is proving that last year was not a fluke.

Houston — The Rockets are a big wild-card in the equation as they are heavily dependent on the oft-injured Tracy McGrady to survive in the West. Yes, they do have one of the most imposing big men in the league in Yao Ming, but they will need T-Mac to stay healthy to have any chance in the postseason. While he may not be the best point guard in the league, Rafer "Skip to My Lou" Alston has proven to be a guy who can distribute the ball and be a formidable defender in the backcourt.

Portland — The Blazers have made it work this season, even though their nucleus of talent is amongst the youngest in the league. Despite losing No. 1 overall pick Greg Oden for the season before he ever strapped it on in a regular season game, Portland has strived on spreading around the scoring amongst the five players on the floor. The guy who really needs to be commended is Brandon Roy, who in just his second year, has become the leader of this band of 20-somethings. While Roy may not get the kind of fanfare for MVP as a guy like Chris Paul may get, Roy is as important to his team as any other player is in the league.

Posted by Rich Lyons at 11:06 AM | Comments (1)

February 5, 2008

39 Days to Selection Sunday

The beauty of following multiple sports is that as soon as your season ends in one, you can throw yourself fully into another. The more pain you experience, the harder you go into the next season. I'm a Pats fan who had a real bad time on Sunday night. Needless to say, I woke up Monday morning thanking God for college hoops.

Over the past week, we've seen one team step above the rest as the favorites to win the title, a few others make a move up or down the ladder of momentum, and some individual performances that made you stop and go "holy crap that guy is good!"

Pitchers and catchers report next week, another great way to pretend 18-1 isn't as bad as it really was, but now is the time for hoops.

The week that was:

TUESDAY

Wake Forest 70, Miami (FL) 68 — In what has to have been one of the most difficult seasons for any team after the passing of Skip Prosser barely more than six months ago, Wake has nonetheless battled to a respectable 13-7 overall record with a 3-4 mark in the ACC after losing a heartbreaker at NC State on Sunday. In this one, promising freshman guard Jeff Teague scored a season-high 27 on 9-of-14 shooting (5-of-6 from three) and backcourt mate Ishmael Smith hit a three-pointer with three seconds left to extend Wake's home-court win streak to 16. They may not be ready to compete at the upper echelon of the conference, but the Deacs under head coach Dino Gaudio are one of the most inspirational stories in the country.

As for Miami, their loss at Duke on Saturday has them on a five-of-six losing streak and they now stand at 10th in the ACC with a 2-5 conference record. If you look at the overall season stats, they don't look so bad. But look at the conference-only stats, and you start to see where the problems are. They are only 10th in three-point percentage at .312 (from an ACC-best .393 on the season as a whole) and are dead last in three-point shooting percentage defense, allowing opponents to hit a ridiculous .417 from long range. They're tied with Wake for the fewest assists per game (10.71), and are last in steals per game at just 4.29.

I'm pretty sure the Hurricanes are on their way to full-fledged collapse already, but if they lose to Florida State on Wednesday we'll know for sure.

George Mason 63, Virginia Commonwealth 51 — The story of this one was the inside dominance of Will Thomas (21 points, 15 boards) and the Patriots over the Rams' frontcourt of Wil Fameni, Larry Sanders, Michael Anderson, and Franck Ndongo (two points apiece and a total of 21 rebounds in 80 total minutes). Another factor was the George Mason defense, forcing the VCU backcourt of Eric Maynor and Jamal Shuler into a combined nine turnovers.

With those factors in mind, these two lessons:

1. Be wary of VCU if they land a strong inside team in the tournament.

2. George Mason is a very dangerous team. They can attack inside and outside. They can score and defend. If they make the Dance, you have to strongly consider picking them in the upset.

Tennessee 93, Alabama 86 — Watching Alonzo Gee and Richard Hendrix combine for 47 points, 21 rebounds, and 5 blocks, I kept asking myself "how the hell are these guys only 1-4 in the SEC?" (They're 2-5 now after this loss and beating LSU on Saturday.) Then Tennessee pulled out in the end, and it became clear: the Tide just don't know how to win. Of their nine losses this year, only two have come by more than 10 points (76-63 at Texas A&M in November and 87-61 to Clemson on New Year's Day). Other than that, it's by two to Belmont, by 10 to Georgetown, by seven to Florida, by four to Arkansas, by seven to Georgia, by 10 to Mississippi State, and by seven in this one.

If both Gee and Hendrix come back for the senior years, when they should get point guard Ronald Steele back healthy, the Crimson Tide are the early favorites for my 2008-09 Preseason Sleeper of the Year candidate. If not, Mark Gottfried might be in for another year of enough talent to win, but not the Ws to show for it.

WEDNESDAY

St. Joseph's 61, George Washington 59 — One of the individual matchups I would most like to see in the NCAA tournament is St. Joe's senior Pat Calathes (18.2 ppg, 8.1 rpg, 46 percent from three) against younger brother and Florida freshman Nick Calathes (15.8 ppg, 5.0 rpg, 6.1 apg). If someone on the Selection Committee could take care of that for me, I would greatly appreciate it.

(Of course St. Joe's has some work left to do before they can qualify as an at-large. At 15-5 overall and 6-1 in the Atlantic 10, they are in position to get the job done. But it's not going to be easy. After last night's big win over Villanova, the Hawks still have a home-and-home with Xavier and road trips to Rhode Island and Dayton.)

Cincinnati 62, West Virginia 39 — It had to kill Bob Huggins to get beat that badly at his new home by the program he led so successfully for so many years. The fact they almost had as many turnovers (8) as they did made field goals (10) probably didn't feel too good. Neither did watching his team hit only 1-of-22 three-point attempts. Oh, and they also got out-rebounded 39-24.

And yet Joe Lunardi has the Mountaineers in the tournament as a 12 seed. Sorry, but I have to respectfully disagree. When you get your ass handed to you that badly at home by a sub-.500 team, you don't get an at-large bid. Call it the "I don't care if you play in the Big East, you can't suck that bad at home" rule.

UAB 88, Central Florida 81 — I'm calling February 16 in Birmingham as the day Memphis loses its undefeated record. Robert Vaden (20.8 ppg, 43.8 percent from three) will be the reason why.

North Carolina Central 67, Coppin State 65 — I know not many people outside of friends, family, and several dozen alumni care about either team, but this win pushed Central's record to 2-23 and was their first road win in 17 attempts. I thought it deserved special mention.

Nebraska 66, Missouri 62 — I gave my little spiel about how Missouri needed some institutional control last week, and Mike Anderson apparently was thinking the same thing. In addition to the injured Stefhon Hannah, Anderson suspended Darryl Butterfield, Leo Lyons, Jason Horton, and Marshall Brown for their roles in the altercation that led to Hannah's broken jaw.

1. Give Anderson credit. You can't have on-court discipline if you don't have off-court discipline. He's taking control of his program, and that's to be commended.

2. And Nebraska still only won by four. Not very impressive there, Doc.

Mississippi 75, Vanderbilt 58 — Good news for Vandy: they shot 100 percent from the free-throw line. Bad news: they only got to the line four times. Combined with the fact nearly half of Vanderbilt's shots were from three-point range (30-of-63) and you have the profile of a team that doesn't penetrate, doesn't attack the rim, and, as a result, can't win against top perimeter defenses. Teams that rely too heavily on jump shots don't win championships — not in the SEC and for damn sure not in the NCAA tournament.

Kansas State 84, Kansas 75 — Though it's obviously an upset when the undefeated number two team in the nation goes down, this one was fairly predictable. The Jayhawks walked into a building on fire in Manhattan, and the duo of Bill Walker and Michael Beasley provided the spark to fuel the upset. (Flaming metaphors!) Of particular note is that Beasley, a terror on the boards and low block, went 4-for-4 from three-point range. On the season, he's now averaging 24.9 points, 12.3 rebounds, 1.4 steals, and 1.8 blocks per game. He's shooting 56 percent from the floor, 74 percent from the free-throw line, and 42.6 percent from three. Somebody in the NBA is going to get a damn fine player in June.

Arkansas 78, Mississippi State 58 — The Hogs are an interesting team right now. In their last three games, they've beaten LSU on the road 68-52, beaten the Bulldogs by 20 in this one, then beat rising Florida 80-61 on Saturday. The last two are arguably their best wins of the season. At the same time, their resume has losses to Providence, Appalachian State (in Little Rock), and a double-drop to South Carolina and Georgia prior to beginning their current three-game win streak.

To some degree, you can pinpoint the inconsistency of the team on the inconsistency of Patrick Beverley. After a very sold first year in which he was named SEC Freshman of the Year, Beverley's shooting has regressed as a sophomore. Not a particularly high-percentage shooter last season at less than 43 percent, Beverley is now down to 39.6 percent. His free-throw shooting has dropped from 81 percent to 65 percent. You just don't see that kind of drop normally, though I haven't found any mention of an injury that might explain it.

The difference over these past few games is that Beverley is finding other ways to help the team win. After just one double-digit rebounding game in Arkansas' first 15, Beverley has gone double-digits four times in the last five games, including 37 combined in the last three. That's a lot of rebounds for a guy 6-foot-1 and generously listed at 180 pounds. With Sonny Weems hitting his shot (better than 50 percent over the last five), Arkansas can pretty much run with anybody.

The schedule is tough from here on out. After hosting Ole Miss this Saturday, the Hogs play five of seven on the road. And it's not an easy five — Tennessee, Mississippi State, Kentucky, Alabama, and the return game with the Rebels. Win at least two of those, plus take care of business at home (Mississippi, LSU, Vandy, and Auburn), and the Hogs shouldn't need another miracle run to the SEC tournament final to make the bracket.

Drake 75, Creighton 65 — Some perspective on the Bulldogs' nobody-in-the-world-saw-this-coming 21-1 start:

Going back to 1906, Drake has had 24 men's basketball coaches. Only two left with winning records at the program, Ossie Solem, who went 37-31 from 1921 to 1925, and the great Maury John, who went 211-131 as coach from 1958 to 1971. Drake's five all-time greatest seasons were all under John, the best of which was 26-5 in 1969, the year John was named national coach of the year.

Drake is 21-1 right now and riding a 19-game win streak. All they need to do is go 5-4 over their next 10 to equal the greatest season they've had in more than a century of basketball.

There's so much more you can write about Drake, it's crazy. For instance, senior guard Adam Emmenecker has gone from playing 11 minutes per game as a junior to 31 this year. His career high for assists was 5. Now he leads the Valley in assists per game at 5.67. There are these kinds of stories all over the Drake roster. I'm telling you — you've got to pay attention to these guys.

Lucky for us, ESPN has done the world a favor and paired the Bulldogs up with Butler (at Butler) in the Bracketbusters series on Saturday, February 23. Now there's a game to look forward to.

THURSDAY

North Carolina 91, Boston College 69 — So I know you probably know this already, but North Carolina and Duke play this Wednesday at the Dean Dome. It'll probably be on TV. You should check it out.

(You can't mess with Duke/North Carolina. You just can't. It's the single greatest rivalry in college sports, and there's no close second. End of discussion.)

(See how dumb that sounds? Do Duke and North Carolina fans really hate each other more than Oregon and Oregon State fans? Or what about BU and BC in college hockey or any of the other hundred-plus rivalries? You can't quantify the animosity between rivals to such a specific degree that you can say one is "better" than the other. Let's just say it'll probably be a really good game and move on.)

Minnesota 77, Michigan 65 — Just how did Michigan get to be this bad? Mitch Albom should write a book about it, call it "How Out of Control Boosters Killed Michigan Basketball" or something like that. There's a bonus for Albom in that the sequel "How Out of Control Boosters Killed USC Football" is only about five years away from being ready to be written.

Western Kentucky 71, Arkansas-Little Rock 47; North Texas 70, South Alabama 68 — I put these together because Western Kentucky/South Alabama is going to be one of those great Championship Week games (assuming seeding holds). Both teams are 10-1 in conference, with South Alabama currently holding the head-to-head advantage. The two play again February 21 at Western Kentucky. The Sun Belt has had some upsets in the NCAA tournament in the past, and both of these teams have the talent to pull it off again. Only one of them will actually get the chance.

Wisconsin 62, Indiana 49 — One of my favorite individual performances of the week was courtesy Wisconsin junior Joe Krabbenhoft. This was the perfect example of a guy playing way beyond his stats. His six points were nice, but the rebounding and passing were exceptional. Of his 12 rebounds, six were on the offensive end, leading directly to 11 Badgers points. He also had five assists and has a better than 2:1 assist-to-turnover ration on the season (64 assists, 29 turnovers). If you look at the stat board, Krabbenhoft isn't going to jump out at you, but he's one of the main reasons Wisconsin has a chance to go deep this year.

Stanford 65, Washington 51 — You have guys like Krabbenhoft who do the little things, and then you have guys like Stanford's Brook Lopez who straight demolish people. He put up 31 points and 13 rebounds with three blocks in this one. Since becoming eligible in late December, Lopez has scored in double digits in all but one of the Cardinal's dozen games. He's averaging 18.9 points, 8.3 rebounds, and 2.1 blocks per game. As an Arizona fan, I'll be glad to see him head off to the NBA next year.

California 69, Washington State 64 — Speaking of great individual lines in the Pac-10, Cal sophomore Ryan Anderson in this one: 27 points on 9-of-13 shooting (5-of-7 from three), with 9 rebounds. He then went out on Saturday and put up 33 and 17 on Washington for a grand total of 60 points (20-of-32 from the field, 11-of-11 from the free-throw line, 9-of-16 from three) and 26 rebounds as the Bears got the road sweep to pull themselves right back in the middle of the Pac. (Pun unintentional, but I'm leaving it in.)

Arizona 80, USC 69 — Pardon the triple foray into the Pac-10, but I wanted to point out that though Arizona pulled this one out thanks to the incredible shooting of Chase Budinger (29 points) and a career-best 23 from Jawann McClellan, Jerryd Bayless was totally outplayed by O.J. Mayo. Actually, Mayo went after Bayless like he had just caught him making a move on his girl. It seemed personal.

FRIDAY

Went to see G Love and Special Sauce at The Pageant here in St. Louis. Good show, though G Love was sick and only played about an hour and a half. Still, dude can play. Plus his bass player (stand-up bass, not electric) had a sick solo. That was awesome. Also, the drummer looks like the kid from Rushmore grown up with dreds.

Princeton 57, Dartmouth 53 — Somehow, this was Princeton's first conference game of the year. How do you make it to February without playing a single game in your conference? Ivy Leaguers think they're so smart. Stupid Ivy League.

SATURDAY

Syracuse 87, Villanova 73 — I've been saying the Orange are in trouble because of their lack of depth, but they are sitting in a very good position at 16-7 and 6-4 in conference. They have a good RPI of 36 and a great overall strength of schedule of six. As long as they don't collapse here at the end, they're in the NCAA tournament with a decent seed. And once you get Donte Green and Jonny Flynn in a tournament setting, who knows how far they can go? This is a dangerous team.

Connecticut 60, Pittsburgh 53 — Talk about your resurgent Big East programs. UConn is one of the hottest teams in the conference, having won five in a row with victories over Marquette, Indiana, Louisville, and Pittsburgh. Their game tomorrow night against Syracuse at the Carrier Dome should be one of the best of the week.

Missouri 77, Kansas State 74 — Ah, the let-down game. True gambling gold.

Rhode Island 82, Dayton 70 — I've been harping on URI forward Kahiem Seawright for a while now, and he's starting to come through. In this game and the win over Richmond on Wednesday, Seawright totaled 27 points and 14 rebounds. He got to the free-throw line 17 times, showing his increased aggressiveness attacking the rim. He also had three blocks in this one.

There are a lot of keys to the Rams' impressive 19-3 start, but Seawright is going to have to continue to force his will for Rhode Island to make a serious run.

Texas Tech 67, Oklahoma State 60 — Let the record show Bob Knight went out a winner. A brief career profile: 1,273 career games, 902 wins, 29 20-win seasons, four 30-win seasons, one perfect season, 28 NCAA tournaments, 3 national championships.

Also, a note to Red Raiders fans: sons have had a fairly decent run taking over for their fathers lately. Two examples: Tony Bennett taking over for dad Dick at Washington State and the Davis transition at Drake. Pat Knight may not be Bob Knight, but that doesn't mean he can't have great success leading the program into the future.

Purdue 83, Illinois 75 — Can I go ahead and claim victory now for picking the Boilermakers as my 2007-08 Sleeper of the Year in my preview column? 18-5 with a 9-1 record in the Big Ten is pretty good for a team with the youngest starting five in the conference, right?

Penn State 85, Michigan State 76 — The Spartans are the worst best team in the country. They play down to their opponents, blow big leads and are inconsistent with their defensive intensity. They can play with anybody when they're on (beat Texas, played UCLA tough), but can also be beat by anybody (Iowa and Penn State are a combined 22-23 and 7-13 in conference). If they get matched up with a team like Davidson or George Mason, State is going down.

UCLA 82, Arizona 60 — When you're looking at that fresh clean bracket, and you're thinking of all the possibilities and all the matchups, find UCLA, then write them into the Final Four. Don't worry about who they play. Don't worry about who's hot or anything like that. Just write down UCLA to the Final Four. They're that good.

UNLV 79, New Mexico 60 — With an RPI in the 20s, you'd think the Rebels would be in good shape if they should fall in the Mountain West tournament. But they don't have any marquis wins (only BYU was in the RPI top 50), which could haunt them, as would losses to UC Santa Barbara (RPI 96) and Air Force (184). With nine games remaining in the regular season, UNLV probably has to win at least seven or eight (including all five home games) in order to survive the upset. They play at Utah tomorrow night.

SUNDAY

Let's just pretend Sunday didn't happen.

MONDAY

Louisville 71, Marquette 57 — Something about playing Louisville must bother Marquette forward Lazar Hayward. Averaging 13 points on 51 percent shooting, he's now combined to hit just 4-of-20 shot attempts for a total of 11 points in Marquette's two losses to the Cardinals. For those gamblers out there, remember that in case these two meet again in the Big Eat tournament.

Saint Mary's 89, Gonzaga 85 (OT) — Both of these teams are going to be on your bracket. If you missed this one, they play again March 1 in Spokane, and then most likely again in the WCC conference tournament final.

Seth Doria is a writer based out of St. Louis. For the only daily column that mixes sports, politics, and entertainment news in one, visit The Left Calf.

Posted by Joshua Duffy at 1:08 PM | Comments (0)

Giant Slayers

An imperfect team won the perfect game. While the superlatives flow freely from all corners to describe this shocking result, I believe the closest word I can find to do this night justice is unfathomable.

Defying all means of reason, logic and — thanks to David Tyree's circus catch — several laws of physics, the 10-6 New York Giants overcame their own glaring flaws and weaknesses, and sent an unblemished and celebrated New England team to a quiet, empty shower. With :35 left on the clock (only one second more than Joe Montana had left some 19 Super Bowls earlier), Eli Manning found an ailing Plaxico Burress and his own chapter in NFL lore in the back of the end zone en route to a 17-14 Giants win that shocked the world along with any other intelligent life that happened to pick up Sunday's FOX broadcast.

At an event where the spectacle often overtakes the sporting element and the hype overshadows the product, the New York Giants' sudden victory over The Artist Formerly Known As 18-0 reminded us just why our culture goes so far out of its way to celebrate the Super Bowl. Even beyond that, this game gave a nation growing increasingly disillusioned with malcontent athletes and asterisks another reminder why we continually come back to sports, and it did so on the grandest stage possible.

Tom Coughlin and the Giants coaching staff came to the desert with a smart clock management gameplan that must have made Bill Parcells briefly thrilled beyond belief before remembering the giant mess he has to work on cleaning up in Miami. The Giants' opening drive of 9:59 that led to a 32-yard Lawrence Tynes field goal meant only three points on the scoreboard, but cutting that deep into the game meant the small lead could not be ignored.

In this bizarre parallel universe, it was formerly maligned Coughlin on top of his game, while hooded mastermind Bill Belichick made boneheaded decisions such as going for it on 4th-and-13, when a 48-yard field goal would have put his team ahead by seven. If it wasn't stupidity that cost New England that possession, then it was most certainly sheer arrogance. The result of the play was no less strange or inept. Tom Brady overthrew the entire field, leaving no chance for a completion.

That was not Brady's only problem, either. The New York defensive line put more heat on Tom Terrific than he had ever felt in any of those previous 18 games. This led to five sacks and countless more hits, body blows, and knockdowns. Despite all this, Brady performed admirably throughout, consistently converting on 3rd-and-long and keeping drives alive.

When the Giants managed to take a stunning 10-7 lead on the younger Manning's first touchdown throw to David Tyree, a bullet fired right by the best cornerback in football by mere inches, the football world was turned on its ear, the complexion of the championship changed. For two full quarters, the score had read 7-3 Patriots with everyone waiting for the other Patriots shoe to drop into the waiting arms of Randy Moss in the end zone and make it 14-3 and put the game away. And yet that never happened.

Instead, the Patriots seemed intent on winning the game much the way they had in their previous three Super victories, with poise and clutch play right down to the wire. Brady's drive following the touchdown to Tyree took 12 plays and showcased New England's offense at their best for the first time all game. Randy Moss made the catch in the end zone on 3rd-and-goal that appeared, as it was in Week 17, to tie the final knot on the undefeated season against the Giants.

Eli Manning was left with 2:42 to score a second touchdown in the quarter against the suddenly-vulnerable Patriots defense. From his own 17, Little Brother took charge. With some help from Brandon Jacobs, whose massive body and outstretched arms proved to be just enough to convert on a do-or-die 4th-and-1, Eli and the Giants reached their own 44 where they faced a 3rd-and-5 that proved to be straight out of a climactic slow-motion movie scene.

As Manning struggled heroically against the three Patriots that grabbed onto his jersey, he seemed to conjure up strength reminiscent of past quarterbacks. Some likened him to another No. 10 on the Giants, Fran Tarkenton. However he also may have looked somewhat like FOX broadcaster Terry Bradshaw once did back in a playoff game in 1972. Bradshaw needed to scramble, bullishly throw defenders off him, and escape in order to buy time and as he put it "cut loose with everything I had" with the game and the season on the line. This is very much what Eli did, as well, and the reception awaiting him, just as with Bradshaw, was a famously immaculate one.

As David Tyree leapt into the air, Manning had put the ball in the perfect spot for Tyree and not safety Rodney Harrison, to make the play. Tyree's difficulty led to him trying to pin the ball against his helmet on the way down. This was made exponentially difficult by Harrison's tackle in which Tyree's horizontal body came down on Rodney's bent knee while the defender body-slammed him to the turf with his arms, the whole time trying to wrestle free David's grip of the ball. And yet neither the ball, nor Tyree ever really hit the ground.

Landing on top of Harrison allowed the unheralded receiver to retain his grip on the ball and keep it from the turf. And while it appeared to the eye that Harrison had administered somewhat of a backbreaker maneuver to Tyree, history will determine it to be quite the other way around.

This unforgettable play took the Giants to the Patriots' 24, and there was still much work to be done. However, Manning advanced the ball in surprisingly easy fashion. On a 3rd-and-11 to Steve Smith on the right side, there was not a Patriot in sight until it was too late, and an ill-advised blitz called by The Hoodie led to Plaxico Burress being single-covered in the end zone on a soft pass from Eli that seemed to float from heaven into his mitts. Suddenly, a 10-6 team was poised to plunder and run off into the Arizona desert with the Lombardi Trophy that was all but engraved with Patriots.

Yet if ever any man could ever put a scare into a team from 84 yards away, it was Tom Brady. The Giants still needed to survive an interminable 3rd-and-20 bomb from Brady's crosshairs to Moss that was simply perfect if not for Giant defender Corey Webster's rubber-glove coverage and ability to deflect the ball away at high speeds without committing a penalty. The symbolism was imminent: on this night, perfection would be foiled by an incredible singular effort.

For fans of both teams who had followed them throughout the season, few could believe the Giants deserved to be in a position to dethrone the mighty Pats. For a team that did not truly earn their stripes until January, and only scored 22 more points than their opponents throughout the season, the final score seemed to make no sense. Super Bowl XLII may very well be remembered by many as the day mediocrity defeated greatness.

For just one year, though, mediocrity comes with a diamond-studded ring.

Posted by Bill Hazell at 11:54 AM | Comments (0)

February 4, 2008

Super Bowl XLII Rewind

Super Bowl XLII
February 3, 2008
Glendale, Arizona
New York Giants 17, New England Patriots 14

Was Super Bowl XLII the best Super Bowl I have ever seen?

I want to answer cautiously, because as I write this sentence, there is still one second remaining on the official game clock. But my answer is that I think it was.

Coming into the game, I thought Super Bowl XXXVI, the Patriot's first Super Bowl win, held that title. I've seen old favorites like Super Bowls III and XIII and XXV. I saw the snooze-fest that was the first three quarters of Super Bowl XXXIV and the wildly uneven Super Bowl XXXVIII, all of which have been suggested as the best ever. What this game featured was the best total defensive effort I have ever seen in a Super Bowl. The Giants weren't the '85 Bears, but this year's Patriots didn't let Refrigerator Perry score a touchdown. Both teams played exceptional defense tonight, though they did seem to tire a little in the fourth quarter. The other characteristic this game highlighted was remarkable clutch performance, on both offense and defense.

The most notable example, of course, was New York's game-winning drive that began with 2:42 left in the game, and in honor of that drive I would like to announce a change in all of my future columns. For four seasons, I have demeaned Eli Manning — a mediocre and consistently overrated quarterback — as "Little Manning" compared to his multiple-MVP, six-time all-pro brother. Well, no more. Now, don't get me wrong. I'm not drinking the Kool-Aid yet, and I don't think five good games in a row suddenly makes Eli an elite QB. But that final drive is going to become legend, and Eli was terrific on it. He's still not Peyton or Brady — he's not even Ben Roethlisberger or Carson Palmer — but he showed something special tonight.

Comparisons to Super Bowl XXXVI

I already mentioned that if someone had asked me yesterday to name the best Super Bowl ever, I probably would have suggested XXXVI, when New England upset the 14-2 Rams. Besides the terrific quality of both games, there are some other similarities between that year's game and this one. Both the 2001 Rams and the 2007 Patriots were dominant, almost flawless, in the regular season. Both teams had terrific passing games led by MVP-winning quarterbacks. The teams that beat them, the '01 Patriots and '07 Giants, were both heavy underdogs whose victories probably shouldn't have surprised as many people as they did. The 2001 Pats were very, very strong at the end of the season, and they were a perfect fit to take advantage of Kurt Warner's weakness as an interception machine.

The 2007 Giants picked up strength throughout the playoffs, getting better every week, and their potent pass-rush was the only hope to knock Tom Brady out of rhythm. Beyond the teams, the games themselves were similar. In both cases, a young quarterback led his team to last-minute victory.

What set this Super Bowl apart for me, aside from the terrific defense and the fourth-quarter scoring drives, was that at no point during the game did either team lead by more than four points. This was the most evenly-played Super Bowl in history, and I don't think that's up for debate.

What Happened?

Exactly what you saw: New York's pass rush disrupted Brady in a way that hadn't happened all season. Brady was sacked five times and knocked down countless others. The Giants kept him off balance early by rushing on most plays, but occasionally dropping into coverage. Later in the game, it was all heat, all the time. With New England unable to sustain drives, that old defense spent a lot of time on the field, and by the end of the game, it was worn out. That opened the door for one moment of glory from New York's offense, a 2:07 touchdown drive. When you play great defense and keep the score close, all it takes is one good drive, sometimes even one great play.

More broadly, I've been asked what happened to the Patriots at the end of the season. For the first three months of the 2007 season, New England wasn't just winning. We were seeing scores like 38-14, 38-7, 52-7. The Patriots won each of their first eight games by at least 17 points. It wasn't just that nobody could beat the Patriots; no one could even give them a decent game. Then, slowly, even though the Patriots kept winning, it included some games they probably shouldn't have. The invincibility started to crack. First, the Colts — a great team I fear history will underrate since they put no visible effort into their playoff game — nearly beat New England. Two weeks later, the Eagles gave them a scare on Sunday Night Football. A week later, they nearly lost to Baltimore. After a pretty thorough beatdown of the Steelers, the Pats seemed to sleepwalk through a pair of less-than-dominant wins over bad teams, and then they edged the Giants in the season finale.

I think the Pats were done in by four factors:

1. The Giants wanted it more. One of the qualities that distinguishes Bill Belichick is his ability as a motivator, to always make his players feel like they have more left to prove, that the work isn't done. Watching the Super Bowl, I thought the Giants were the team that played with more intensity. They were more active, more fired-up, more involved. I don't mean to say that the Patriots didn't play hard or weren't trying, because I don't think that's true. I just think the Giants were trying harder. They elevated their game.

2. By the end of this season, the Giants were a great team. History will remember the 2007 New York Giants as the team that beat the undefeated Patriots and the winner of Super Bowl XLII, but these Giants will never be included among of best-of-all-time discussions. They went 10-6 in the regular season and only outscored their opponents by +18. They had injury problems, and early in the season struggled to establish an identity on defense and in the running game. Eli Manning was inconsistent and often played poorly. At the end of the season, though, everything seemed to come together.

I know lots of other analysts have spoken or written about the significance of that Week 17 game against the Patriots, but I don't think that can be overstated. From a purely practical standpoint, the game meant nothing to either team. Both had already clinched playoff position to the point that the results of the game wouldn't affect it. Most teams would have gone through the motions and played a snoozer. These two battled it out and gave us a great game. Manning had his best game of the season and the Giants proved they could go toe-to-toe with the best team in the league. They entered the playoffs with confidence and momentum, and they got better every week. By Super Bowl Sunday, the Giants were playing at a very, very high level.

The Patriots were the best team in the league for the 2007 season as a whole, but the Giants were the best team on the field tonight. They deserved to win.

3. The Patriots got tired. Conventional wisdom says that a team full of veterans will play well in the regular season, but be worn out by the playoffs. New England played its best football in September and October. But the team was full of savvy old veterans, and there comes a point at which your body just can't keep up. Mike Vrabel is 33. Tedy Bruschi is 34. Rodney Harrison is 35. Junior Seau is 39. Even Brady, Kevin Faulk, and Randy Moss are all over 30. When you're counting on key contributions in February from guys that old, you're pushing your luck.

The Patriots were pushed to their limits in the last two months. It all started with that game against the Colts, but then there were draining efforts against Philadelphia, Baltimore, and the Giants, followed by tough, down-to-the-wire playoff games against the Jaguars and Chargers. By the end of the Super Bowl, New England's defense was worn down — too worn down to stop Manning and the Giants — and it showed.

4. The Giants played it perfectly. I don't mean that the Giants played a perfect game. They didn't. But their strategy was dead on. The offense kept its cool and didn't try to force anything that wasn't there. It mixed just enough runs in with Manning's passes to keep New England's defense honest, and Manning spread the ball around, hitting seven different receivers. Plaxico Burress is the Giants' premier offensive weapon, and the Patriots shut him down for most of Sunday night's game. So Manning hit his second and third receivers for a combined 11 receptions. No panic.

On defense, as I've already noted, the Giants put Brady off-balance early and kept pressure on him throughout the game with a consistent and successful rush. This followed the so-called "blueprint" laid out by Jim Johnson and the Eagles in their near-upset of the Patriots after Thanksgiving. Committing pass rushers rather than defensive backs means you might get burned, but if you try to play it safe, you'll get eaten alive. The Giants never called off the dogs or changed their strategy.

A Moment of Controversy

The Giants won this game by three points. At the beginning of the third quarter, the Patriots drove into Giants territory and went for it on 4th-and-13 rather than attempt a 49-yard field goal. They didn't pick up the first down. If New England had made that field goal, the game probably would have gone into overtime. In hindsight, it's easy to say that Belichick made the wrong decision. But the question is whether the Pats had a better chance of converting 4th-and-13 or making a long field goal. There are extra advantages, even, to picking up the first down: extra rest for your defense, a shot at seven points instead of three, and eight yards of field position that would be lost with a missed kick. I understand the logic in going for the first down, but I don't think it was the right move.

MVP

I never vote for the person who is named Super Bowl MVP. I've covered six Super Bowls for Sports Central, and here are my votes in each one:

Super Bowl	My Vote			Actual Winner

XXXVII Simeon Rice Dexter Jackson
XXXVIII Richard Seymour Tom Brady
XXXIX Deion Branch Deion Branch*
XL Antwaan Randle El Hines Ward
XLI Joseph Addai Peyton Manning
XLII Justin Tuck Eli Manning

* I assume the vote was counted incorrectly.

Eli played very well, and he's not a bad choice for this year's award. But in a game so dominated by defense, I just can't see picking an offensive player. If coaches were eligible, New York defensive coordinator Steve Spagnuolo would be an easy choice. As it is, Tuck, Osi Umenyiora, and Michael Strahan would probably be my top three choices. But I can also understand viewing New York's defensive performance as an outstanding team effort and Manning as the one big star on offense. Whatever else Eli does in his career, that drive at the end was something special.

Credit Is Due...

...to referee Mike Carey and his crew. One of the reasons this game was so enjoyable was that the officials didn't play a big role. There were no game-turning penalties or controversial replays, and for the most part, the officials kept the game moving.

Announcers and Entertainment

This section is a scattered collection of thoughts that don't fit well into paragraph format, so I'm just going with bullet points.

  • You have my pity if you watched the miserable pre-game affairs. I did like Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers at halftime, though their set seemed a little long.
  • Howie Long was at his best as part of FOX's behind-the-desk analysis team. He was focused on the game and provided solid analysis of what we were seeing.
  • I really hope those idiots who were sitting behind Jimmy Johnson don't contribute to the gene pool.
  • Joe Buck and Troy Aikman did a fine job of calling the game. Nothing spectacular, but for Buck, anything short of horrendous is a plus, and I thought he was professional and effective. He was even in a funny commercial.
  • This was Anheuser-Busch's best year of Super Bowl ads since those frogs a decade ago.

Best Commercial

The world has been waiting 25 years to see CGI lizards doing the "Thriller" dance. At last, the wait is over.

Posted by Brad Oremland at 11:03 AM | Comments (2)

No Djok(ovic): Federer Finally Challenged

So it finally happened. For the first time since early 2005, something other than the perfect storm (read: Rafael Nadal in Paris in June) finally got the best of Roger Federer in a major.

But it wasn't just that Novak Djokovic knocked off King Roger in Australia. After all, even when Marat Safin (the last guy to pull off the non-Nadal, non-French trick) beat Federer Down Under, he needed five gripping sets and had to fight off a match-point. No, this wasn't just a majority decision against Federer; this was a sixth-round knockout.

The most relevant imagery that hatched out of this upset surrounded not the talent of the Djoker or even the skills of Federer. Instead, what I couldn't get past was how fragile Federer's psyche looked as he plummeted toward defeat.

And this wasn't the first we've seen of this. Federer's temper in his junior days is fairly well-chronicled. But as recently as last summer in his kingdom of Wimbledon, Roger the Impecable showed signs of poor focus. After he got the short end of a player-challenge against Nadal in the final, Federer asked the chair umpire to turn off the replay system.

For those of you unfamiliar with the fine print of tennis' replays, this would be akin to Bill Belichick telling the officials in the Super Bowl to stop checking out the challenge reviews. Needless to say, Federer's request was not anywhere near the realm of the ground rules. On such a great stage, it was unthinkable that such a graceful champion would be unraveled to that degree.

Of course, it's easy to find reasons why someone so dominant would find his most immediate shortcomings between the ears. Federer's unapproachable talent leaves shockingly few matches in which he needs to dig through the rubble of frustration piling up in his brain in order to win. That is one of few categories in which Federer is at a distinct experience disadvantage to his opponents.

Like golf, tennis is a game of great potential frustration. Anyone who has picked up a racquet understands the angst that can come as serve-after-serve sails past the service box or collects harmlessly in the net. Why wouldn't the exact same motion that earned dozens of service points yesterday do the same today? Several smashed racquets later, most of us still never learn the answer to that question.

So what now? Unfortunately, as it always seems to, this year's Aussie Open was a tasty appetizer to a meal that is still months from service. We can't really judge a Federer bounce back at the next major, the French, where he's never won. Instead, all eyes should be on the Swiss Mister in June and July in England.

It's one thing for Nadal to handle Federer at Roland Garros or for Djokovic to pick him off on neutral turf like Melbourne. But not the All England Club. Not the grass courts and respectful crowds at the most famous tournament where Federer seems to simultaneously draw from and build on tennis lore.

When Nadal offered his five-set challenge to Federer at Wimbledon a year ago, we all raised an eyebrow. Now that Djokovic has drawn a gasp from the tennis world with his stunning upset, Federer finally needs to answer a challenge that we've been waiting on for a few years.

The question of whether Federer is the greatest ever has been on the table for a while now. What he does in the next six months to answer this challenge will go a long way in deciding that case.

Posted by Corrie Trouw at 11:02 AM | Comments (8)

A "Giant" Season

Everyone that doubted the New York Giants can now sit down and bow their head in disbelief because the New York Giants are Super Bowl XLII champions. I repeat: the Giants are Super Bowl Champions.

Yes, this is a "Giant" season.

This is the season that the Giants had to show time and time again what they are made of. This is the season that the Giants did better on the road, winning their last 11 away from Giants Stadium and being dubbed the best road team.

For the New York Giants (10-6 regular season record), the 2007 season was anything but Cinderella, compared to their Super Bowl XLII contenders, the New England Patriots, who had a perfect 18-0 record going into the Super Bowl (now the 1972 Miami Dolphins can still savior their perfect record). But in the end, the Patriots kind of got what they deserved after it was noted that they were spying on the Jets' plays in the first game of the season.

For the Giants, many underlying questions came to light when they had their struggles such as "is Eli the real deal?" and "is Tom Coughlin on his way out?" Those questions were raised before the Giants started to turn the season around and making it to the playoffs and eventually win the Super Bowl. Eli Manning went 19-of-34 for 255 yards and was crowned the Super Bowl XLII MVP, just like his brother was last season with the Indianapolis Colts. And after all the complaining, especially from Tiki Barber, about Coughlin's coaching style, he proved them wrong. Coughlin is a hard charger and all he wants are for the Giants to play hard and have heart. That's what they did in Super Bowl XLII.

"Whether or not I have to utilize this verbally to the team or not," Coughlin said in his daily press conference, "it's there. We've been underdogs pretty much every time we've played. The main theme is having something to prove. We always have something to prove and there's nothing wrong with that."

The play of the Super Bowl XLII came with 35 seconds left in the game and Eli Manning making the pass of his life to Plaxico Burress, a 13-yard touchdown pass on an 83-yard, 12-play drive. This was also the pass that Manning and Burress were practicing all week before the Super Bowl and it paid off. The Giants defense also hit Patriots quarterback Tom Brady hard, sacking him five times, with Brady throwing 29-of-48 passes for 266 yards.

The momentum for their stake at the Super Bowl title started in the wild card round of the playoffs when the Giants beat Tampa Bay, 24-14. They then went to the divisional round and beat Dallas 21-17. The Conference Championships was where everyone doubted the determination of the Giants against the Green Bay Packers and said that "they had no chance." Well, everyone was wrong. Yes, it was a nail-biter but the Giants walked away with a 23-20 overtime victory and their chance at greatness came true.

"We like making things tough on ourselves," Eli Manning said to the media. "We like the tough situations ... You are going against a team that is undefeated in the Super Bowl, and it is not going to be easy. It is going to be a tough game, but that is when we have been playing our best football."

For the Giants as a franchise, they are used to having winning seasons. They have won six NFL titles (1927, 1934, 1938, 1956, 1986, and 1990) and have found many ways to win — just like this season on the gridiron. The Giants last Super Bowl appearance was in 2000 when Jim Fassel was head coach and that season was in question. 2000 was a make-or-break year for the team and after two back-to-back losses at home against St. Louis and Detroit, the Giants' record went to 7-4 and them making the playoffs was bleak. Fassel said in a press conference that "they are going to the playoffs." They responded winning the rest of their games and facing the Baltimore Ravens in Super Bowl XXXV, losing to them 34-7.

For every Giants team, they find ways to win when their backs are against the wall, from the 2000 team to the '07 team. When Tom Coughlin took the team over in 2004, it was a struggle. His tenure produced inconsistent results with a 25-23 record and two playoff losses and media scrutiny how he has been guiding the team. However, this season the team found ways to win and without scrutiny of the coaching staff or the many negative headlines the were plastered all over the tabloids last season.

"We're not going to please everyone and we know that," Coughlin told the media. "Sam Walton had said you shouldn't worry about what's written in the newspaper. You should focus on the customer. At the same time, we also need to tell our story better."

A better story this year than past years and wins that have made many say this is a great team. This season, the Giants tied the record for most sacks as a team in an NFL game, after sacking Philadelphia Eagles quarterback Donovan McNabb 12 times on their September 30 meeting. They were also the third franchise to win 600 games, defeating the Atlanta Falcons 31-10. They defeated the Miami Dolphins in their October 28th game at London's Wembley Stadium, outside the United States, 13-10. This paved their way to make it to the Super Bowl and a winning season. They also set the record for most consecutive road wins with 10 and are the first team to defeat the No. 1 seed of their division since the 1990 playoff realignment.

"If you are as good as you can possibly be, the rest of that stuff will take care of itself," Coughlin said. "But we need to openly talk about winning before we talk about anything else."

Something that the Giants know now with the ring of Super Bowl XLII champions.

Posted by Joe Boesch at 11:00 AM | Comments (0)