Go Back   Sports Central Message Boards > Collegiate Sports Discussion > College Football

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-12-2011, 10:13 AM   #1
Marc
Administrator
 
Marc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Lake Wylie, SC
Posts: 26,387
Marc will become famous soon enough
Default Texas A&M to SEC?

http://www.sacbee.com/2011/08/10/383...ov-perrys.html

Quote:
FORT WORTH, Texas -- Man the lifeboats, Big 12 commissioner Dan Beebe. More Texas A&M SEC-ession talk surfaced Wednesday, with the state's highest-profile Aggie, Gov. Rick Perry, shining a public spotlight on private talks between his alma mater and the Southeastern Conference.
"As far as I know, conversations are being had," Perry told statehouse reporters from The Dallas Morning News. "That's frankly all I know. I just refer you to the university and the decision-makers over there."

Fair enough. But let's be realistic enough to understand that Perry, a potential presidential candidate and former A&M yell leader, ranks among the biggest decision-makers at his alma mater.

If Perry wants to be the catalyst to carry the Aggies to the SEC by the 2013 football season, if not sooner, he clearly is well-positioned to steer things in that direction. Such a move has been a topic of heavy speculation in recent days on A&M message boards, websites and Twitter feeds although school officials have worked to downplay the furor.

In the wake of Perry's comments, A&M officials responded Wednesday night with a statement saying university President R. Bowen Loftin "is committed to doing what is best for Texas A&M not only now, but also in the future. We continue to have wide-ranging conversations regarding all aspects of the university, including both academics and athletics."

Notice the statement does not include a denial of SEC-related discussions. That means the talks have substance. But is moving to the SEC a good idea for A&M?

No doubt, it raises A&M's profile nationally. But it could diminish a football program on the rise by forcing the Aggies to play a steady diet of recent BCS national champions like Auburn (2010), Alabama (2009), Florida (2008, 2006) and LSU (2007, 2003) simply to win the SEC's West Division.
Realize that adding A&M, which pondered a move to the SEC last summer when the Big 12 was teetering on the brink of extinction, would allow SEC officials to re-open negotiations on a $2 billion, 15-year television rights agreement signed in 2008 that now looks puny, based on recent standards set by the Pac-12 and others. So the SEC has reason to be interested, whether A&M would join as a solo act or in conjunction with another school like Florida State or Clemson.

It is no secret that A&M officials are frustrated by the impending launch of the Longhorn Network, Texas' 24-hour station in conjunction with ESPN, and have voiced concerns about the growing clout given to their rival and its network in deciding Big 12 issues.

During last week's meeting of Big 12 athletic directors, A&M essentially finished 1-1 on two points of contention: The Longhorn Network was barred from televising high school games for one year (win for A&M) but league officials approved the possibility of a conference football game on the Longhorn Network if the opposing team and league officials agreed (UT win).

Maybe 1-1 wasn't good enough for A&M officials. Maybe Perry is simply stirring the pot to try and elicit more concessions from Big 12 officials in future meetings.

Either way, Beebe needs to realize his conference is back in play as a target for poachers from rival leagues. And the Aggies sound like a group eager to find a neighborhood that does not include the Longhorn Network.
Very opposed to this. Geographically, Texas isn't even in the southeast, get out of here...
__________________
Marc James - SCMB Administrator | Sports Central Managing Editor & Founder
Teams: [Kentucky Wildcats] [Green Bay Packers] [Charlotte Hornets]
Follow on Twitter: @mnjames | @sportcentral
Marc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2011, 05:26 PM   #2
themush
Banned
 
themush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 8,839
themush has a spectacular aura aboutthemush has a spectacular aura about
Default

TCU joining the Big East is ok?
themush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-15-2011, 04:23 PM   #3
Marc
Administrator
 
Marc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Lake Wylie, SC
Posts: 26,387
Marc will become famous soon enough
Default

What, mush?

SEC turned down Texas A&M. That's what I'm talking about. They need to only include elite teams ... like Kentucky. :thumbup:
__________________
Marc James - SCMB Administrator | Sports Central Managing Editor & Founder
Teams: [Kentucky Wildcats] [Green Bay Packers] [Charlotte Hornets]
Follow on Twitter: @mnjames | @sportcentral
Marc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2011, 06:15 PM   #4
themush
Banned
 
themush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 8,839
themush has a spectacular aura aboutthemush has a spectacular aura about
Default

U said it doesn't make sense geographically. So I asked if TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY joining the Big East makes sense.
themush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2011, 11:46 AM   #5
Marc
Administrator
 
Marc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Lake Wylie, SC
Posts: 26,387
Marc will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by themush View Post
U said it doesn't make sense geographically. So I asked if TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY joining the Big East makes sense.
Absolutely not!
__________________
Marc James - SCMB Administrator | Sports Central Managing Editor & Founder
Teams: [Kentucky Wildcats] [Green Bay Packers] [Charlotte Hornets]
Follow on Twitter: @mnjames | @sportcentral
Marc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2011, 09:52 PM   #6
Marc
Administrator
 
Marc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Lake Wylie, SC
Posts: 26,387
Marc will become famous soon enough
Default

The Pac-10 is now the Pac-12, the Big 12 is disintegrating, and the SEC is expanding. Many think FBS is heading toward four super conferences. Is this a good thing or bad thing for the game? I think four evenly-powered super conferences would be exciting, though I was initially sad to see some conferences devastated. It's an eat or be eaten world...
__________________
Marc James - SCMB Administrator | Sports Central Managing Editor & Founder
Teams: [Kentucky Wildcats] [Green Bay Packers] [Charlotte Hornets]
Follow on Twitter: @mnjames | @sportcentral
Marc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SEC finally clean? buckeyefan78 College Football 3 07-26-2007 08:36 PM
SEC v Big 10 in non-conf scheduling for 06... buckeyefan78 College Football 17 06-21-2006 10:13 AM
USC 50, Fresno State 42. KevinBeane College Football 74 11-27-2005 08:34 AM
Dennis Franchione heading to Texas A&M digital7 College Football 12 12-09-2002 12:43 PM
Who will Rule the SEC in 2002/2003 bama4256 College Football 4 08-09-2002 12:25 AM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:56 AM.