Monday, August 30, 2010
UFC 118 and Why MMA Needs to Change
UFC 118 was a huge event for mixed martial arts fans. It featured a title fight in the UFC's lightweight division, a number one contender fight in the same division, and perhaps most significantly, UFC Hall of Famer Randy Couture vs. boxing champion James "Lights Out" Toney.
The boxing vs. MMA angle, of course, has been overblown since before the fight was announced. In a boxing contest, any high-level boxer would win nine times out of 10 against a high-level mixed martial artist, probably more than nine out of 10. Similarly, a high-level MMA fighter will take nine of 10 from a high-level boxer under MMA rules. Both Couture (who is 47) and Toney (who is 42 and overweight) are past their primes, and one fight doesn't prove anything.
Nonetheless, Couture's easy victory this weekend does provide validation for MMA fans. The notion that a boxer would defeat an equally skilled mixed martial artist in a fight where takedowns are permitted is laughable. A boxer would win a boxing match, and probably a kickboxing contest; the MMA fighter would win anything else, including a no-holds-barred fight or a street brawl. Think Rocky vs. Tommy at the end of Rocky V.
That said, I would be remiss not to compliment Couture on an absolutely perfect gameplan, executed to further perfection. The Couture/Toney matchup was a bit of a freakshow, though, and the real action Saturday night was in the UFC's lightweight division. In the main event, reigning champ Frankie Edgar outclassed B.J. Penn in a surprisingly one-sided five-round decision. Edgar was the quicker, more aggressive fighter, and Penn never sustained any effective offense.
Earlier on the card, Gray Maynard won an easy decision over perennial gatekeeper Kenny Florian. Why anyone ever picks against Maynard is a bit of a mystery to me. His next fight will be with Edgar for the 155-pound title, and Maynard — the only fighter to defeat Edgar — should be a slight favorite. Kicking off the evening, local product Joe Lauzon put on the most impressive performance of his career, positively tearing through Gabe Ruediger. Lauzon was visibly fired up by fighting in front of his hometown fans, and it was the most enjoyable fight of the night from where I was sitting.
John McCarthy is Wrong
a.k.a. What MMA Needs to Change
MMA Fighting's Ben Fowlkes recently wrote about officiating and accountability in MMA; it's undeniably a problem. The sport routinely sees inept referees and uninformed judges unduly influence fight results, and it is no exaggeration to say that most MMA fans could do a better job of reffing and judging fights than the people who are paid to do so. Notably, state athletic commissions are usually stacked with people who come from a boxing background and misunderstand or underestimate the importance of grappling and ground-fighting.
Nobody wants to see fighters stood up in the middle of a submission attempt, but Fowlkes quoted legendary MMA ref "Big" John McCarthy insisting that fighters who gain a dominant position should never be stood up. With all due respect to McCarthy, he couldn't be more wrong.
Mixed martial arts is fundamentally an entertainment business. All sports are. If the product is not entertaining, people won't watch; they certainly won't pay $45 for the privilege. If MMA wants to grow as a sport, if the people running organizations like the UFC want to grow their businesses, they need to recognize that they are selling entertainment, and lay-and-pray — the derogatory term for the tactic of laying atop your opponent and praying for a decision victory — is not entertaining. In fact, it's frustrating and dull.
Even apart from the necessity of providing entertainment — and it is a necessity if we want anything beyond an amateur circuit — sports require action. Virtually every sport has rules against stalling. Basketball has a shot clock, American football has delay of game penalties, tennis has time violations, and so on. MMA does have standards for continuous action, but they are unevenly enforced, with inexperienced refs frequently standing things up too soon, and well-meaning guys like Big John approvingly allowing lay-and-pray to go on ad infinitum. No other sport rewards the intentional prevention of progress; no other referees sanction deliberate stalling.
In particular, whoever is winning is not permitted to stall. Letting a guy run out the clock once he gets side control would be like getting rid of the shot clock in basketball, or eliminating delay of game calls in football. Once someone got on top, they could just hold the ball until time expired. Some MMA refs actually allow this to occur, and right now there's no official recourse to prevent or punish it. That needs to change.
Don't get me wrong: I like grappling. Submission specialist Demian Maia is one of my favorite fighters. So are Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira, Georges St-Pierre, Miguel Torres, and any number of other fighters whose greatest strength is their ground-fighting. I even think guys like Jon Fitch and Rashad Evans get a bad rap; those guys stay active on the ground, and while they're not effective finishers, they're not just getting the takedown and waiting for 15 minutes to be up. They're not one-dimensional wrestlers, they're mixed martial artists who utilize a strong wrestling background. They throw strikes from the top, try to improve position, take a submission if it's there. There's nothing wrong with that. I like grappling.
But I don't like lay-and-pray. It's boring, it's not sportsmanlike, and it's not MMA. It's stalling, plain and simple. Most importantly, it turns people away from the sport. The incessant clinching between Nik Lentz and Andre Winner was frustratingly, agonizingly dull. The televised portion of Bellator 25 was a groan-inducing bore, with lots of wrestling and clinching, but very few attempts to finish fights, via strikes or submissions. The Bellator announcers openly derided the incredibly dull contest between Cole Konrad and Rogent Lloret. One day earlier, at WEC 50, Chad "The Snuggie" Mendes put on the most appalling display of lay-and-pray I have ever seen, and it is because of tactics like his that McCarthy is wrong.
In the first round, Mendes gained a dominant position over Cub Swanson, then smothered him, making no attempt to finish the fight. He threw literally no strikes, he attempted absolutely no submissions, and he made no effort whatsoever to further improve his position. He just held Swanson down and waited for the round to pass. That's the definition of lay-and-pray. It was so dull I wanted to gouge my eyes out simply so I wouldn't watch any more. I thought I was going to die of ennui. I never, ever want to see Chad Mendes "fight" again. He's not a mixed martial artist; he's not a fighter.
Gaining top control, even a dominant position like mount, and then lying on your opponent and waiting for the round to end is disrespectful to the fans who paid to see you fight, disrespectful to the promoters paying you to perform, disrespectful to the sport. The people who sell tickets and pay-per-view buys and advertising need to recognize that this hurts their profitability. Fighters, trainers, and refs need to recognize that it hurts the sport. Judges need to recognize that a fighter throwing damaging strikes from the bottom, or attempting submissions from below, is beating a fighter who lies on top of him and does nothing but try to hold him down.
Almost every sport, usually early in its history, has faced situations like this. Teams or individuals with limited talent realize that they can maximize their chances of winning by limiting the action. So they stall, and often they start winning. But the interests of the individual are at odds with the interests of the sport. These tactics turn off fans, and they aren't particularly sporting (which is a polite way of saying they aren't even fair). After a while, usually not very long, the leagues enact rules to prevent those tactics.
Organizations like the UFC have a fair degree of control over their rules; some points are subject to the athletic commissions, but if MMA organizations want to keep the action going, it's within their power to mandate that. For the good of the sport, the pleasure of the fans, and the profitability of the fight organizations themselves, referees should receive explicit instructions about keeping action moving, even when fighters gain a dominant position. I'm not saying we stand things up right after a guy gets to mount; I'm just saying that if nothing is happening — if the guy on top is content to lie there, or if the fighter on the bottom has neutralized his opponent's offense for the present and for the immediate future — that the ref should step in following a warning. And let's make that a single warning — I'm tired of refs covering for themselves by repeatedly threatening to stand a fight up when they have no intention of actually doing so.
The same thing applies to prolonged clinching, which may be tactical, but is not entertaining. Stalling is a tactic, too, in baseball and football and tennis and MMA, but it's not a legitimate one, and it's not good for anyone except the person doing the stalling. It should be illegal, and MMA organizations risk a permanent ceiling on their viewership if they don't act to prohibit it.
September 2010 UFC Rankings
The rankings below are exclusively for the UFC, so you won't see names like Alistair Overeem or Fëdor Emelianenko on these lists.
Heavyweight (206-265 lbs)
1. Brock Lesnar
2. Cain Velasquez
3. Junior Dos Santos
4. Shane Carwin
5. Roy Nelson
6. Frank Mir
7. Antonio Rodrigo Nogueira
8. Ben Rothwell
9. Mirko Filipovic
10. Cheick Kongo
Make it happen: Carwin vs. Nelson
Two huge (literally) fighters coming off losses. The winner should move back into immediate title contention.
Thank you, UFC, for: Mir vs. Filipovic
This is a much more interesting fight than Mir vs. Nogueira 2.
Light Heavyweight (186-205)
1. Mauricio "Shogun" Rua
2. Lyoto Machida
3. Rashad Evans
4. Jon Jones
5. Quinton "Rampage" Jackson
6. Antonio Rogerio Nogueira
7. Thiago Silva
8. Ryan Bader
9. Forrest Griffin
10. Rich Franklin
Make it happen: Jones vs. a quality opponent
Fans don't want to see Jones fight Franklin or Griffin or Couture; they are legitimately worried about what would happen to these fighters they admire and respect. Jones is a wrecking machine, and putting him against anyone but top-caliber competition is sadistic at this point. I'd like to see him face Thiago Silva or the winner of Nogueira/Bader.
Thank you, UFC, for: Nogueira vs. Bader
A stiff test for the Ultimate Fighter Season Eight winner comes at just the right time. The victor should get either Jon Jones or the winner of the expected Machida/Rampage matchup, with a title shot on the line.
Middleweight (171-185)
1. Anderson Silva
2. Chael Sonnen
3. Yushin Okami
4. Vitor Belfort
5. Nate Marquardt
6. Demian Maia
7. Wanderlei Silva
8. Michael Bisping
9. Chris Leben
10. Yoshihiro Akiyama
Make it happen: Wanderlei Silva vs. Leben
Leben asked for this fight, and Wandy won't turn anyone down. This has Fight of the Night written all over it, or at least "entertaining slugfest." I know Silva's out of action for a while, but Leben has earned a break, and this is worth waiting for.
Thank you, UFC, for: Belfort vs. Okami
This fight is not official yet, but there are rumors afoot, and it's absolutely the only fight that makes sense for either man at this point. This sets up an undisputed title contender.
Welterweight (156-170)
1. Georges St-Pierre
2. Jon Fitch
3. Jake Shields
4. Thiago Alves
5. Martin Kampmann
6. Paulo Thiago
7. Josh Koscheck
8. Matt Hughes
9. Dan Hardy
10. Dong Hyun Kim
Make it happen: Matt Hughes vs. winner of Shields/Kampmann
Hughes hasn't shown much interest recently in fighting top-flight competition, but coming off a great performance against a legit opponent, and with a title shot on the line, maybe he can be persuaded. If the winner of the Shields fight gets a title shot, Hughes should face Jon Fitch.
Thank you, UFC, for: Everything
This is by far the UFC's deepest division right now, and there are a bunch of great fights coming up: Shields vs. Kampmann, Hardy vs. Carlos Condit, Thiago vs. Diego Sanchez, and so on. It's hard for matchmaker Joe Silva to go wrong at this point.
Lightweight (146-155)
1. Frankie Edgar
2. Gray Maynard
3. B.J. Penn
4. Kenny Florian
5. George Sotiropoulos
6. Evan Dunham
7. Takanori Gomi
8. Joe Stevenson
9. Tyson Griffin
10. Jim Miller
Make it happen: Sotiropoulos vs. Gomi
Sotiropoulos hasn't lost in almost four years, and that was a DQ loss (which only sort of counts) against legendary Japanese lightweight Shinya Aoki. Already this year he's beaten Stevenson and ended Kurt Pellegrino's four-fight UFC winning streak. Gomi was widely dismissed as a contender following his loss to Florian, then celebrated following his knockout of Griffin. The UFC should be positioning both Sotiropoulos and Dunham for title shots, and the Gomi fight is a logical next move for the Aussie submission specialist.
Thank you, UFC, for: Dunham vs. Sean Sherk
Sherk isn't ranked above because he hasn't fought in over a year, but he's obviously a top-ten talent, and Dunham is quickly climbing the ranks of the 155-pound weight class. The winner of this bout should be one more fight away from a title shot.
Upcoming Action
With Strikeforce unable to make fights happen, DREAM struggling to survive, and Bellator mostly featuring second-tier fighters, the most significant action is happening under the Zuffa banner. UFC 119, scheduled for September 25, boasts two significant fights. If we're being honest, the headliner, Mir vs. Cro Cop, is a "for the fans" fight. It's an interesting matchup, and I'm excited to see it, but neither man appears to be a realistic heavyweight contender at this point. More intriguing are Little Nog vs. Bader and Sherk vs. Dunham, both of which could position young up-and-comers for title shots in the near future. I could change my mind in the next month, but right now, put me down for Bader, Dunham, and — in an upset — Filipovic. I don't know if Mir can take him down, and Cro Cop is still the superior striker.
An even better card goes down less than a week later, when Broomfield, Colorado, hosts WEC 51. The card features featherweight champ Jose Aldo's title defense against Manny Gamburyan, the long-awaited rematch of Jamie Varner and Donald Cerrone, Miguel Torres vs. Charlie Valencia, and the returns of Leonard Garcia and Chan Sung Jung. Aldo and Torres are always worth watching, and Varner vs. Cerrone is intriguing on several levels. First of all, it matches up two of the best lightweights in the WEC. Second, it's a rematch of a controversial bout from 2009, with Varner winning a split decision following an illegal strike from Cerrone. Third, the two men hate each other. What more could you ask for?
Garcia and Jung aren't fighting each other, but both have proved that they bring plenty of excitement, and a rematch of their three-round classic in April is expected if both men win. That fight, while not technical, was dramatic and entertaining, a strong Fight of the Year candidate. It has even earned comparisons to Don Frye vs. Yoshihiro Takayama. I would actually argue that Garcia vs. "The Korean Zombie" featured more prolonged action than that classic bout, and fans have been looking forward to seeing both fighters again.
I'll take Garcia and Jung to win their respective contests (against Mark Hominick and George Roop), and nothing will induce me to bet against Aldo. I'll go with Torres to rebound, and I'm rolling the dice on Varner to make it 2-0 against Cowboy. Not the boldest picks, I know, but if you put a few of those together in a parlay, you could do alright for yourself.