[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Sports Central

[an error occurred while processing this directive]


Please Visit Our Sponsors
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

NBA - Should Fans Pick the All-Stars?

By Bill Ingram
Monday, February 3rd, 2003
Print   Recommend

Jason Kidd. Is anyone better in the Eastern Conference? He arrived in New Jersey via trade from the Phoenix Suns and immediately lead his team to the NBA Finals. He was second in MVP voting only to San Antonio's Tim Duncan.

Surely, he is the top vote-getter among Eastern Conference players, right? Well, no. In fact, he wasn't even close. Kidd won't even get to start in next weekend's All-Star Game, causing many NBA analysts to ask if the fans should really get to choose who plays.

The fans voted Allen Iverson into the starting lineup ahead of Kidd, so the man who is now being called "The Problem" instead of "The Answer" by his own Philadelphia media will be playing ahead of Kidd, the Eastern Conference's best player. That's not the only injustice at hand in the East, however.

How about Vince Carter starting ahead of Antoine Walker at the forward position? A quick comparison shows that Walker averages better than 21 points per game -- and has played in 43 games for the Celtics this season. Carter has played in only 15 games, and when healthy is scoring at an 18 ppg clip. The Celtics are in the thick of the playoff hunt, the Raptors are bottom-dwellers looking for some help from this summer's draft. Clearly, the fans missed the mark by a mile on two of the three Eastern starters. Not so in the West.

The Western Conference All-Star team takes the court without a single member of either of the West's top two teams. The most dominant player in the game will come off the bench to make room for rookie Yao Ming in the starting lineup, and Dirk Nowitzki, who is the best player on the best team in the league, will have to yield to Kevin Garnett, whose Wolves won't even have home court advantage in the playoffs.

We can make an argument for Steve Francis, since he is the only player in the NBA besides fellow-starter Kobe Bryant averaging at least 20 points, 6 rebounds, and 6 assists, but wouldn't Steve Nash, who makes everyone around him better, be a better choise?

And so I ask: who should choose? The 29 head coaches pick the reserves, and they corrected most of the injustices. Nowitzki, Nash, Michael Jordan, Kidd, Shaquille O'Neal, Walker, and Chris Webber (replaced by Peja Stojakovic due to injury) were all chosen to back up the curious starting lineups. Should the coaches be allowed to choose the whole thing?

Voting for the all-stars is a time-honored tradition in every major sport, and it is a way to keep the fans involved in the game they adore, but more and more we are finding that fans may not know what is best for the sport, and certainly watching a bunch of (popular) secondary players is not as thrilling as watching the real stars take the court together.

It will never be like it was. Magic Johnson, Larry Bird, Hakeem Olajuwon, Jordan, Patrick Ewing, Isiah Thomas -- all taking the court together. Those were the stars who brought the league where it is today. Nonetheless, the game might be better served if the coaches are allowed to make sure the best and brightest are on the court when the ball goes up on All-Star Weekend.

Have something to say? Visit the message boards and discuss this article.

Comments? Agree? Disagree? Send in your feedback about this article.

     Back to NBA
     Back to Home

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Interested in advertising with us?
More information.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]